Watson, J. D. & Crick, F. H. C. A anatomy for deoxyribose nucleic acid. Nature 171, 737–738 (1953).
Franklin, R. E. & Gosling, R. G. Diminutive agreement in sodium thymonucleate. Nature 171, 740–741 (1953).
Kendrew, J. C. et al. Anatomy of myoglobin: a three-dimensional Fourier amalgam at 2Å resolution. Nature 185, 422–427 (1960).
Dutta, S. & Berman, H. M. Ample macromolecular complexes in the Protein Abstracts Bank: a cachet report. Anatomy 13, 381–388 (2005). An absorbing Review of some of the ample 3D structures that accept been solved.
Adrian, M., Dubochet, J., Lepault, J. & McDowall, A. W. Cryo-electron microscopy of viruses. Nature 308, 32–36 (1984).
Grünewald, K. & Cyrklaff, M. Anatomy of circuitous bacilli and virus-infected beef by electron cryo tomography. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 9, 437–442 (2006).
Chothia, C. & Lesk, A. M. The affiliation amid the alteration of arrangement and anatomy in proteins. EMBO J. 5, 823–826 (1986). The aboriginal affirmation that protein 3D anatomy is bigger conserved than arrangement is.
Rost, B. Twilight area of protein arrangement alignments. Protein Eng. 12, 85–94 (1999).
Pearl, F. M.G. et al. The CATH continued protein-family database: accouterment structural annotations for genome sequences. Prot. Sci. 11, 233–244 (2002).
Marsden, R. L. et al. Exploiting protein anatomy abstracts to yze the change of protein action and biological complexity. Phil. Trans. Royal Soc. B-Biol. Sci. 361, 425–440 (2006).
Orengo, C. A., Sillitoe, I., Reeves, G. & Pearl, F. M. G. What can structural classifications acknowledge about protein evolution? J. Struct. Biol. 134, 145–165 (2001).
Lee, D., Grant, A., Buchan, D. & Orengo, C. A structural angle on genome evolution. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 13, 359–369 (2003).
Vogel, C., Bashton, M., Kerrison, N. D., Chothia, C. & Teichmann, S. A. Structure, action and change of multidomain proteins. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 14, 208–216 (2004).
Ranea, J. A. G., Sillero, A. Thornton, J. M. & Orengo, C. A. Protein superfamily change and the aftermost accepted accepted antecedent (LUCA). J. Mol. Evol. 63, 513–525 (2006). These authors altercate that the protein domains that are present beyond all kingdoms of action may accept been present in the aftermost accepted accepted ancestor.
Martin, A. C. R. et al. Protein folds and functions. Anatomy 6, 875–884 (1998).
Matthews, B. W. Structural and abiogenetic assay of protein stability. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 62, 139–160 (1993).
Sinha, N. & Nussinov, R. Point mutations and arrangement airheadedness in proteins: redistributions of preexisting populations. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 3139–3144 (2001).
Stenson, P. D. et al. Beastly Gene Alteration Database (HGMD): 2003 update. Hum. Mutat. 21, 577–581 (2003).
Wang, Z. & Moult, J. SNPs, protein structure, and disease. Hum. Mutat. 17, 263–270 (2001).
Steward, R. E., MacArthur, M.W, Laskowski, R. A. & Thornton, J. M. Diminutive base of affiliated diseases: a structural perspctive. Trends Genet. 19, 505–513 (2003).
Ferrer-Costa, C., Orozco, M. & de la Cruz, X. Characterization of disease-associated audible amino acerbic polymorphisms in agreement of arrangement and anatomy properties. J. Mol. Biol. 315, 771–786 (2002).
Yue, P. & Moult, J. Identification and assay of deleterious beastly SNPs. J. Mol. Biol. 356, 1263–1274 (2006).
Yue, P., Li, Z. & Moult, J. Loss of protein anatomy adherence as a above adroit agency in monogenic disease. J. Mol. Biol. 353, 459–473 (2005).
Chang, Y.-F., Imam, J. S. & Wilkinson, M. F. The -mediated adulteration RNA surveillance pathway. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 76, 51–74 (2007).
Vogt, G. et al. Gain-of-glycosylation mutations. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 17, 245–251 (2007).
Ng, P.C & Henikoff, S. Predicting the aftereffect of amino acerbic substitutions on protein function. Annu. Rev. Genom. Beastly Genet. 7, 61–80 (2006).
Saunders, C. T. & Baker, D. Evaluation of structural and evolutionary contributions to deleterious alteration prediction. J. Mol. Biol. 322, 891–901 (2002).
Karchin, R. et al. LS-SNP: all-embracing comment of coding non-synonymous SNPs based on assorted advice sources. Bioinformatics 21, 2814–2820 (2005).
Zvelebil, M. J., Barton, G. J., Taylor, W. R. & Sternberg, M. J. E. Anticipation of protein accessory anatomy and alive sites appliance the alignment of akin sequences. J. Mol. Biol. 195, 957–961 (1987).
Poussu, E., Vihinen, M., Paulin, L. & Savilahti, H. Probing the α-complementing area of E. coli β-galactosidase with use of an insertional pentapeptide mutagenesis action based on Mu in vitro DNA transposition. Proteins 54, 681–692 (2004).
Chen, R. Enzyme engineering: rational redesign against directed evolution. Trends Biotechnol. 19, 13–14 (2001).
Getzoff, E. D. et al. Faster superoxide-dismutase mutants advised by acceptable electrostatic guidance. Nature 358, 347–351 (1992).
Xing, Y. & Lee, C. Another splicing and RNA another burden — evolutionary after-effects for eukaryotic genomes. Nature Rev. Genet. 7, 499–509 (2006).
Black, D. L. Protein assortment from another splicing: a claiming for bioinformatics and post-genome biology. Cell 103, 367–370 (2000).
Johnson, J. M. et al. Genome-wide assay of beastly another pre-mRNA splicing with exon alliance microarrays. Science 302, 2141–2144 (2003).
Stamm, S. et al. Action of another splicing. Gene 344, 1–20 (2005). A nice Review of braid variants that are accepted to be associated with another functions.
Schmucker, D. et al. Drosophila Dscam is an axon advice receptor announcement amazing diminutive diversity. Cell 101, 671–684 (2000).
Celetto, A. M. & Gravely, B. R. Another splicing of the Drosophila Dscam pre-mRNA is both temporally and spatially regulated. Assay 159, 599–608 (2001).
Stetefeld, J. & Ruegg, M. A. Structural and anatomic assortment generated by another mRNA splicing. Trends Biochem. Sci. 30, 515–521 (2005).
Hymowitz, S. G. et al. The clear structures of EDA-A1 and EDA-A2: braid variants with audible receptor specificity. Anatomy 11, 1513–1520 (2003).
Walma, T. et al. A bankrupt bounden abridged and all-around destabilization adapt the bounden backdrop of an alternatively spliced anatomy of the additional PDZ area of PTP-BL. Anatomy 12, 11–20 (2004).
Garcia, J., Gerber, S. H., Sugita, S., Sudhof, T. C. & Rizo, J. A conformational about-face in the Piccolo C2A area adapted by another splicing. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 11, 45–53 (2004).
Lewis, B. P., Green, R. E. & Brenner, S. E. Evidence for the boundless coupling of another splicing and -mediated mRNA adulteration in humans. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 189–192 (2003).
Henikoff, S. et al. Gene families: the anatomy of protein paralogs and chimeras. Science 278, 609–614 (1997).
Brodsky, G. et al. The beastly GARS–AIRS–GART gene encodes two proteins which are differentially bidding during beastly academician development and temporally overexpressed in cerebellum of individuals with Down syndrome. Hum. Mol. Genet. 6, 2043–2050 (1997).
Orban, T. I. & Olah, E. Emerging roles of BRCA1 another splicing. Mol. Pathol. 56, 191–197 (2003).
Kriventseva, E. V. et al. Increase of anatomic assortment by another splicing. Trends Genet. 19, 124–128 (2003).
Zavolan, M. & van Nimwegen, E. The types and prevalence of another braid forms. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 16, 362–367 (2006).
Liu, M., Walch, H., Wu, S & Grigoriev, A. Significant amplification of exon-bordering protein domains during beastly proteome evolution. Nucleic Acids Res. 33, 95–105 (2005). This cardboard demonstrates that protein domains with borders that accompany with exon borders assume to be added abounding than added domains, possibly as a aftereffect of exon ambiguity and gene duplication.
Yura, K. et al. Another splicing in beastly transcriptome: anatomic and structural access on proteins. Gene 380, 63–71 (2006).
Tress, M. L. et al. The implications of another splicing in the ENCODE protein complement. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 5495–5500 (2007).
Romero, P. R. et al. Another splicing in concert with protein built-in ataxia enables added anatomic assortment in multicellular organisms. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 8390–8395 (2006).
Wang, P., Yan, B., Guo, J.-T., Hicks, C. & Xu, Y. Structural genomics assay of another splicing and appliance to isoform anatomy modeling. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 18920–18925 (2005).
Burlingame, R. W. et al. Crystallographic anatomy of the octameric histone amount of the nucleosome at a resolution of 3.3Å. Science 228, 546–553 (1985).
Klug, A. et al. Crystallographic anatomy of the octamer histone amount of the nucleosome. Science 229, 1109–1113 (1985).
Arents, G., Burlingame, R. W., Wang, B. C., Love, W. E. & Moudrianakis, E, N. The nucleosomal amount histone octamer at 3.1 Å resolution: a tripartite protein accumulation and a awkward superhelix. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 88, 10148–10152 (1991).
Luger, K., Mäder, A. W., Richmond, R. K., Sargent D. F. & Richmond, T. J. Clear anatomy of the nucleosome amount atom at 2.8Å resolution. Nature 389, 251–260 (1997).
Luger, K. Anatomy and activating behaviour of nucleosomes. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 13, 127–135 (2003).
Bhaumik, S. R., Smith, E. & Shilatifard, A. Covalent modifications of histones during development and ache pathogenesis. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 14, 1008–1016 (2007).
Turner, B. M. Cellular anamnesis and the histone code. Cell 111, 285–291 (2002).
Taverna, S. D., Li, H., Ruthenburg, A. J., Allis, C. D. & Patel, D. J. How chromatin-binding modules adapt histone modifications: acquaint from able abridged pickers. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 14, 1025–1040 (2007).
Latham, J. A. & Dent, S. Y. R. Cross-regulation of histone modifications. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 14, 1017–1024 (2007).
Rando, O. J. All-around patterns of histone modifications. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 17, 94–99 (2007).
Min, J., Zhang, Y. & Xu, R. M. Structural base for specific bounden of Polycomb chromodomain to histone H3 methylated at Lys 27. Genes Dev. 17, 1823–1828 (2003).
Jacobs, S. A. & Khorasanizadeh, S. Anatomy of HP1 chromodomain apprenticed to a lysine 9-methylated histone H3 tail. Science 295, 2080–2083 (2002).
Suto, R. K., Clarkson, M. J., Tremethick, D. J. & Luger, K. Clear anatomy of a nucleosome amount atom absolute the alternative histone H2A. Z. Nature Struct. Biol. 7, 1121–1124 (2000).
Couture, J.-F. & Trievel, R. C. Histone-modifying enzymes: encrypting an ambiguous epigenetic code. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 16, 753–760 (2006).
Holbert, M. A. & Marmorstein, R. Anatomy and action of enzymes that aish histone modifications. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 15, 673–680 (2005).
Schalch, T., Duda, S., Sargent, D. F. & Richmond, T. J. X-ray anatomy of a tetranucleosome and its implications for the chromatin fibre. Nature 436, 138–141 (2005).
Groth, A., Rocha, W., Verreault, A. & Almouzni, G. Chromatin challenges during DNA archetype and repair. Cell 128, 721–733 (2007).
Cairns, B. R. Chromatin remodeling: insights and artifice from single-molecule studies. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 14, 989–996 (2007).
Greenbaum, J. A., Parker, S. C. J. & Tullius, T. D. Detection of DNA structural motifs in anatomic genomic elements. Genome Res. 17, 940–946 (2007).
Kornberg, R. D. & Lorch, Y. Chromatin rules. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 14, 986–988 (2007). An overview for a appropriate copy of Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. (dated Nov 2007) adherent absolutely to the structural alignment and action of chromatin.
Luscombe, N. M., Austin, S. E., Berman, H. M. & Thornton, J. M. An overview of the structures of protein–DNA complexes. Genome Biol. 1, 1 (2000).
Matthews, B. W. Protein–DNA interaction. No cipher for recognition. Nature 335, 294–295 (1988).
Luscombe, N. M., Laskowski, R. A. & Thornton, J. M. Amino acid–base brace interactions: a three-dimensional assay of protein-DNA interactions at an diminutive level. Nucleic Acids Res. 29, 2860–2874 (2001).
Benos, P. V., Lapedes, A. S. & Stormo, G. D. Is there a cipher for protein–DNA recognition? Probab(ilistical)ly. BioEssays 24, 466–475 (2002).
Marmorstein, R. & Fitzgerald, M. X. Modulation of DNA-binding domains for sequence-specific DNA recognition. Gene 304, 1–12 (2003).
Ambros, V. The functions of beastly microRNAs. Nature 431, 350–355 (2004).
MacRae, I. J. et al. Structural base for double-stranded RNA processing by Dicer. Science 311, 195–198 (2006).
Serganov, A. & Patel, D. J. Ribozymes, riboswitches and beyond: adjustment of gene announcement after proteins. Nature Rev. Genet. 8, 776–790 (2007).
Vitreschak, A. G., Rodionov, D. A., Mironov, A. A. & Gelfand, M. S. Riboswitches: the oldest apparatus for the adjustment of gene expression? Trends Genet. 20, 44–50 (2004).
Lanctôt, C., Cheutin, T., Cremer, M., Cavalli, G. & Cremer, T. Activating genome architectonics in the nuclear space: adjustment of gene announcement in three dimensions. Nature Rev. Genet. 8, 104–115 (2007).
Sexton, T., Schober, H., Fraser, P. & Gasser, S. M. Gene adjustment through nuclear organization. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 14, 1049–1055 (2007).
Kulikova, T. et al. EMBL Nucleotide Arrangement Database in 2006. Nucleic Acids Res. 35, D16–D20 (2007).
Brenner, S. E. A bout of structural genomics. Nature Rev. Genet. 2, 801–809 (2001).
Bateman, A. et al. The Pfam protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, D138–D141 (2004).
Chandonia, J. M. & Brenner, S. E. The appulse of structural genomics: Expectations and outcomes. Science 311, 347–351 (2006).
Watson, J. D. et al. Towards absolutely automatic structure-based action anticipation in structural genomics: a case study. J. Mol. Biol. 367, 1511–22 (2007).
Bernstein, F. C. et al. The Protein Abstracts Bank: a computer-based archival book of macromolecular structures. J. Mol. Biol. 112, 535–542 (1977).
Berman, H. M. et al. The Protein Abstracts Bank. Nucleic Acids Res. 28, 235–242 (2000).
Berman, H. M., Henrick, K. & Nakamura, H. Announcing the common Protein Abstracts Bank. Nature Struct. Biol. 10, 980 (2003).
Laskowski, R. A., Chistyakov, V. V. & Thornton, J. M. PDBsum more: new summaries and yses of the accepted 3D structures of proteins and nucleic acids. Nucleic Acids Res. 33, D266–D268 (2005).
Schwede, T., Kopp, J., Guex, N. & Peitsch, M. C. SWISS-MODEL: an automatic protein-homology server. Nucleic Acids Res. 31, 3381–3385 (2003).
Pieper, U. et al. MODBASE: a database of annotated allusive protein anatomy models, and associated resources. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, D217–D222 (2004).
Dantzer, J, Moad, C. Heiland, R & Mooney S. MutDB services: alternate structural assay of alteration data. Nucleic Acids Res. 33, W311–W314 (2005).
Berman, H. M. et al. The Nucleic Acerbic Database: a absolute relational database of three-dimensional structures of nucleic acids. Biophys. J. 63, 751–759 (1992).
Laskowski, R. A. in Structural Bioinformatics (eds Bourne, P. E. & Weissig, H.) 273–303 (John Wiley, New Jersey, 2003).
Kleywegt, G. J. & Jones, T. A. Phi-psi-chology: Ramachandran revisited. Anatomy 4, 1395–1400 (1996).
Krissinel, E. & Henrick, K. Inference of macromolecular assemblies from apparent state. J. Mol. Biol. 372, 774–797 (2007).
Rosenberg, J. M., Seeman, N. C., Kim, J. J. P., Suddath, F. L., Nicholas, H. B. & Rich, A. Bifold braid at diminutive resolution. Nature 243, 150–154 (1973).
Day, R. O., Seeman, N. C., Rosenberg, J. M. & Rich, A. A apparent fragment of the bifold helix: the anatomy of the dinucleoside phosphate guanylyl-3′, 5′-cytidine. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 70, 849–853 (1973). References 101 and 102 accepted the Watson–Crick hydrogen-bonding antecedent amid commutual DNA bases.
Wing, R. et al. Clear anatomy assay of a complete about-face of B-DNA. Nature 287, 755–758 (1980).
DeLano, W. L. The PyMOL Diminutive Graphics System. (DeLano Scientific, San Carlos, USA, 2002).
Five Things You Should Do In What Enzyme Forms Covalent Bonds Between Restriction Fragments | What Enzyme Forms Covalent Bonds Between Restriction Fragments – what enzyme forms covalent bonds between restriction fragments
| Delightful to be able to my personal blog site, within this moment I’m going to teach you with regards to what enzyme forms covalent bonds between restriction fragments
. And after this, here is the 1st graphic: