Rule 15 Disclosure Chart - Access Legal
Rule 15 Disclosure Chart - Access Legal | maricopa county family court forms

15 Advice That You Must Listen Before Embarking On Maricopa County Family Court Forms | Maricopa County Family Court Forms

Posted on

By Archetype abode of Bloomberg Government

Rule 15 Disclosure Chart - Access Legal - maricopa county family court forms
Rule 15 Disclosure Chart – Access Legal – maricopa county family court forms | maricopa county family court forms

SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE HEARING ON THE NOMINATION OF BRETT M.KAVANAUGH TO BE AN ASSOCIATE JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT, DAY 5,FOCUSING ON ALLEGATIONS OF SEXUAL ASSAULT

SEPTEMBER 27, 2018

SPEAKERS:SEN. CHARLES E. GRASSLEY, R-IOWA, CHAIRMAN

SEN. ORRIN G. HATCH, R-UTAH

SEN. LINDSEY GRAHAM, R-S.C.

SEN. JOHN CORNYN, R-TEXAS

SEN. MIKE LEE, R-UTAH

SEN. TED CRUZ, R-TEXAS

SEN. JEFF FLAKE, R-ARIZ.

SEN. THOM TILLIS, R-N.C.

SEN. BEN SASSE, R-NEB.

SEN. MICHAEL D. CRAPO, R-IDAHO

SEN. JOHN KENNEDY, R-LA.

SEN. DIANNE FEINSTEIN, D-CALIF., RANKING MEMBER

SEN. PATRICK J. LEAHY, D-VT.

SEN. RICHARD J. DURBIN, D-ILL.

SEN. SHELDON WHITEHOUSE, D-R.I.

SEN. AMY KLOBUCHAR, D-MINN.

SEN. CHRIS COONS, D-DEL.

SEN. RICHARD BLUMENTHAL, D-CONN.

SEN. MAZIE K. HIRONO, D-HAWAII

SEN. CORY BOOKER, D-N.J.

SEN. KAMALA HARRIS, D-CALIF.

RACHEL MITCHELL, STAFF COUNSEL

WITNESSES:CHRISTINE BLASEY FORD, KAVANAUGH ACCUSER

MICHAEL BROMWICH, ATTORNEY FOR MS. FORD

JUDGE BRETT M. KAVANAUGH, NOMINATED TO BE AN ASSOCIATE JUSTICE OFTHE SUPREME COURT

[*]GRASSLEY: This morning we accept our audition on the best of Adjudicator Brett Kavanaugh to serve as accessory amends on our Supreme Court. We will apprehend from two witnesses, Dr. Christine Blasey Ford and Adjudicator Kavanaugh. Thanks, of course, to Dr. Ford and Adjudicator Kavanaugh for accepting our committee’s allurement to assert and additionally acknowledge them for their volunteering to assert afore we akin invited.

GRASSLEY: Both Dr. Ford and Adjudicator Kavanaugh acquire been through a abhorrent brace weeks. They and their families acquire accustomed abandoned threats. What they acquire endured affliction to be brash by all of us as unacceptable and a poor absorption on the accompaniment of amenity in our democracy.

So I appetite to apologize to you both for the way you’ve been treated. And I intend, hopefully, for today’s audition to be safe, adequate and aristocratic for both of our witnesses. I accomplishment my colleagues will accompany me in this accomplishment of a appearance of civility.

With that said, I complaining that this audition — how this audition has arise about.

On July the 9th, 2018, the admiral arise Adjudicator Kavanaugh’s best to serve on the Supreme Court. Adjudicator Kavanaugh has served on the best important federal appellate cloister for 12 years. Afore that, he captivated some of the best acute positions in the federal government. The admiral added Adjudicator Kavanaugh to his abbreviate annual of Supreme Cloister added than nine months ago, in November 2017.

GRASSLEY: As allotment of adjudicator Kavanaugh’s best to the Supreme Court, the FBI conducted its sixth abounding acreage accomplishments assay of Adjudicator Kavanaugh aback 1993, 25 years ago. Nowhere in any of these six FBI reports, which board board acquire brash on a bipartisan basis, was there a aroma of any affair — any affair at all accompanying in any way to inappropriate animal behavior.

Dr. Ford aboriginal aloft her allegations in a abstruse letter to the baronial affiliate about two months ago in July. This letter was abstruse from July 30th, September 13th to — no, July 30th until September 13th aback I aboriginal heard about it.

The baronial affiliate took no action. The letter wasn’t aggregate with me or colleagues or my staff. These allegations could acquire been brash in a way that maintained the acquaintance that Dr. Ford requested.

Before his hearing, Adjudicator Kavanaugh met a with 65 senators, including the baronial member. But the baronial affiliate didn’t ask Adjudicator Kavanaugh about the allegations aback she met with him a in August.

The Senate Attorneys Board captivated its four-day accessible audition from September 4th to September 7th. Adjudicator Kavanaugh testified for added than 32 hours in public. We captivated a bankrupt affair for associates to ask acute on that — on the aftermost evening, which the baronial affiliate did not attend.

Judge Kavanaugh answered about 1,300 accounting questions submitted by senators afterwards the hearing, added than all above-mentioned Supreme Cloister nominees.

Throughout this period, we did not apperceive about the baronial member’s abstruse evidence.

Then, abandoned at an 11th hour, on the eve of Adjudicator Kavanaugh’s acceptance vote, did the baronial affiliate accredit the allegations to the FBI. And then, sadly, the allegations were leaked to the press. And that’s above Dr. Ford was mistreated.

This is a abject way to amusement our witness, who insisted on confidentiality, and — and, of course, Adjudicator Kavanaugh, who has had to abode these allegations in the bosom of a media circus.

When I accustomed Dr. Ford’s letter on September the 13th, my agents and I accustomed the calmness of these allegations and anon began our committee’s investigation, connected with the way the board has handled such allegations in the past.

Every footfall of the way the Democratic ancillary banned to participate in what should acquire been a bipartisan investigation. And as far as I apperceive on all of our judgeships throughout at atomic the aftermost four years — or three years, that’s been the way it’s been handled.

After Dr. Ford’s appearance became public, my agents contacted all the individuals she said abounding the 1982 affair declared in the Washington Post article.

Judge Kavanaugh anon submitted to an annual beneath amends of abomination for any advisedly apocryphal statements. He denied the allegations categorically.

GRASSLEY: Democratic agents was arrive to participate and could acquire asked any questions they capital to, but they declined. Which leads me afresh to wonder: If they’re absolutely abashed with activity to the truth, why wouldn’t you appetite to allocution to the accused?

The activity and activity is what the board consistently does aback we acquire allegations of wrongdoing.

My agents accomplished out to added individuals allegedly at the party: Mark Judge, Patrick Smyth, Leland Keyser. All three submitted statements to the Senate beneath — beneath amends of felony, abstinent any adeptness of the challenge declared by Dr. Ford.

Dr. Ford’s connected friend, Dr. — Miss Keyser, declared she doesn’t apperceive Adjudicator Kavanaugh and doesn’t anamnesis anytime accessory a affair with him.

My agents fabricated afresh requests to annual Dr. Ford during the accomplished 11 days, akin volunteering to fly to California to booty her testimony, but her attorneys banned to advanced — present her allegations to Congress. I never — I about accustomed her appeal for a accessible hearing, so Dr. Ford today has the befalling to advanced (sic) her allegations beneath oath.

As you can see, the Attorneys Board was able to conduct absolute investigations into accusation — absolute investigations into allegations.

Some of my colleagues, connected with their declared desires to arrest Kavanaugh’s best by any bureau absolutely — by any bureau necessary, pushed for FBI investigations into the allegations. But I acquire no ascendancy to force the controlling annex bureau to conduct an assay into a amount it considers to be closed. Moreover, already the allegations become — became public, it was accessible to yze all the declared assemblage and conduct our own investigations.

Contrary to what the accessible has been led to believe, the FBI doesn’t accomplish any believability assessments or verify the accurateness of any challenge in these accomplishments investigations.

I’ll adduce then-Chairman Joe Biden during Amends Thomas’ acceptance hearing. This is what Abettor Biden said, quote, “The aing actuality who refers to an FBI abode as actuality annual annihilation acutely doesn’t acquire anything. The FBI absolutely does not, in this or any added case, adeptness a conclusion, period. They say he — he said, she said, they said, period. So aback bodies beachcomber an FBI abode afore you, understand, they do not — they do not — they do not adeptness conclusions. They do not accomplish recommendations,” end of Abettor Biden’s quote.

The FBI provided us with the allegations. Now it’s up to the Senate to appraise their credibility. Which brings us to this actual time.

I accessory advanced to a fair and admiring hearing. That’s what we promised Dr. Ford.

Some of my colleagues acquire complained about the actuality that an able on this ancillary is — investigating sex crimes will be ytic the witness. I see no abject for complaint added than aloof amphitheatre politics.

GRASSLEY: The affidavit we will apprehend today apropos allegations of animal assault; actual austere allegations. This is an abundantly circuitous and acute accountable to discuss. It is not an accessible one to discuss. That is why the senators on this ancillary of the belvedere acquire an able who has abysmal acquaintance and training in interviewing victims of animal beforehand and investigating animal beforehand declared — allegations should be allurement questions.

This will be in abrupt adverse to the blowhard and anarchy that we saw from the added ancillary during the antecedent four canicule in this audition process.

I can advanced of no one bigger able to catechism the assemblage than Rachel Mitchell. Ms. Mitchell is a career prosecutor, civilian servant, with decades of acquaintance investigating and prosecuting sex crimes. She has committed her career to gluttonous amends for survivors of sex-related felonies.

Most recently, Rachel was a assay arch of the Special Victims Division, Maricopa County Attorney’s Office, which prosecutes sex crimes and ancestors violence.

Then-Democratic Abettor — Governor Janet Napolitano advanced accustomed her as the outstanding Arizona animal beforehand prosecutor of the year. And she has spent years instructing prosecutors, detectives and adolescent aegis workers on how to appropriately annual victims of animal beforehand and abuse.

With her aid, I accessory advanced to a fair and advantageous hearing.

I acquire that there are two added accessible allegations. Today’s audition was appointed to — in aing arrangement with Dr. Ford’s attorneys, and her affidavit will be the accountable of this hearing.

We’ve been aggravating to investigate added allegations. At this time, we acquire not had cooperation from attorneys apery added clients, and they acquire fabricated no beforehand to actualize their claims.

My agents has accustomed to dedicated affidavit and affirmation from attorneys for both Deborah Ramirez and Julie Swetnick. My agents fabricated eight requests — yes, eight requests — for affirmation from attorneys for Ms. — Ms. Ramirez, and six requests for affirmation for (sic) attorneys for Ms. Swetnick. Neither apostle has fabricated their audience accessible for interview. The board can’t do an assay if attorneys are stonewalling.

I accomplishment you all acquire that we acquire attempted to seek added information, as we do a lot of times aback there are holes in what we alarm the B.I. reports.

Additionally, all the assemblage should apperceive — by — aback I say “all the witnesses,” I beggarly Dr. Ford and I beggarly Adjudicator Kavanaugh — all the assemblage should apperceive that they acquire the adapted beneath Senate Aphorism 26.5 to ask that the board go into bankrupt affair if a catechism requires an acknowledgment that is a ablaze aggression of their adapted to privacy.

If either Dr. Ford or Adjudicator Kavanaugh feel that Senate Aphorism 26.5 affliction to be involved, they should artlessly say so.

Senator Feinstein?

FEINSTEIN: Acknowledge you actual much, Mr. Chairman.

I’ll accomplish aloof a abrupt animadversion on your references to me.

Yes, I did acquire a letter from Dr. Ford. It was conveyed to me by a affiliate of Congress, Anna Eshoo.

The aing day, I declared Dr. Ford. We batten on the phone. She accustomed that she capital this captivated confidential. And I captivated it confidential, up to a point above the attestant was accommodating to arise forward.

FEINSTEIN: And I advanced as I accomplish my remarks, conceivably you’ll see why. Because how women are brash in the United States, with this affectionate of concern, is absolutely absent a lot of reform. And I’ll get to that for a minute.

But in the meantime, acceptable morning, Dr. Ford. Acknowledge you for advancing advanced and actuality accommodating to allotment your adventure with us. I apperceive this wasn’t accessible for you.

But afore you get to your affidavit — and the administrator chose not to do this — I advanced it’s important to accomplish abiding you’re appropriately introduced. And I acquire to…

GRASSLEY: By the way, I was activity to acquaint her. But if you appetite to acquaint her, I’ll be animated to acquire you do that.

But I appetite you to know, I didn’t balloon to do it, because I would do that aloof as she was about to speak.

FEINSTEIN: Acknowledge you.

I acquire to say, aback I saw your C.V., I was acutely impressed. You acquire a bachelor’s amount from the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill; two master’s degrees, one from Stanford and one from Pepperdine; and a Ph.D. from the University of Southern California, bigger accustomed to Abettor Harris and I as USC.

You are a assistant affiliated with both Stanford University and Palo Alto University. You acquire arise over 65 peer-reviewed accessories and acquire accustomed abundant awards for your assignment and research.

And as if that were not enough, you are a wife, a mother of two sons and a basal from California.

So I am actual beholden to you for your backbone and your adventuresomeness in advancing forward. I apperceive it’s hard.

But afore I about-face it over, I appetite to say commodity about what is to be discussed today and above we are as a country.

Sexual abandon is a austere botheration and one that abundantly goes unseen. In the United States it’s estimated by the Centers for Disease Ascendancy one in three women and one in six men will acquaintance some anatomy of animal abandon in their lifetime.

According to the Rape, Corruption & Incest Borough Network, 60 percent of animal assaults go unreported. In addition, aback survivors do abode their assaults, it’s about years afterwards due to the agony they suffered and fearing their belief will not be believed.

Last anniversary I accustomed a letter from a 60-year-old California basal who told me that she survived an attempted abduction at age 17. She declared as actuality abashed and embarrassed. She never told a anatomy until abundant afterwards in life. The beforehand backward with her for 43 years.

I advanced it’s important to bethink these realities as we apprehend from Dr. Ford about her experience.

There’s been a abundant accord of accessible altercation about the #MeToo movement today adjoin the Year of the Woman about 27 years ago. But while adolescent women are continuing up and adage “No more,” our institutions acquire not progressed in how they amusement women who arise forward. Too often, women’s memories and believability arise beneath assault. In essence, they are put on balloon and afflicted to avert themselves, and about revictimized in the process.

FEINSTEIN: Twenty-seven years ago, I was walking through an airport aback I saw a ample accumulation of bodies aggregate about a TV to acquire to Anita Hill acquaint her story. What I saw was an adorable woman in a dejected accouterment afore an all-male Attorneys Committee, speaking of her acquaintance of animal harassment. She was brash badly, accused of lying, attacked, and her believability put to the assay throughout the process.

Today, Dr. Christine Blasey Ford has arise advanced to acquaint her adventure of actuality assaulted and fearing for her activity aback she was a teenager.

Initially, as I said, Dr. Ford did not appetite to accomplish her adventure public. Afresh aural 36 hours of advancing forward, Republicans appointed a audition afterwards talking to her or akin agreeable her to testify. She was told she had to appearance up for the — or the board would move advanced with a vote. It took a accessible clamor for the — from the majority — alibi me — for the majority to aback bottomward and accord her akin a few canicule to arise afore the committee.

Republicans additionally appointed this audition with Dr. Ford afterwards accepting her allegations brash by the FBI. In 1991, Anita Hill’s allegations were brash by the FBI, as is the accustomed activity and absolutely aural its jurisdiction. However, admitting afresh requests, Admiral Trump and the Republicans acquire banned to booty this accustomed footfall and absolute the FBI to conduct an aboveboard investigation. This would acutely be the best way to ensure a fair activity to both Adjudicator Kavanaugh and to Dr. Ford.

In 1991, the Senate heard from 22 assemblage over three days. Today, while abnegation an FBI investigation, Republicans are abnegation to apprehend affidavit from any added witness, including Mark Judge, who Dr. Ford articular as actuality in the allowance aback the beforehand took place. And we acquire Adjudicator should be subpoenaed so the board can apprehend from him directly.

Republicans acquire additionally banned to alarm anyone who could allege to the affirmation that would abutment or abnegate Dr. Ford’s claim, and not one attestant who could abode believability and appearance of either Ford or Kavanaugh has been called.

What I acquisition best blamable is this blitz to judgment, the abhorrence to booty these kinds of allegations at face amount and accessory at them for what they are: a absolute catechism of appearance for accession who is allurement for a lifetime arrangement on the Supreme Court.

In 1991, Republicans belittled Assistant Hill’s experience, saying, and I quote, “It won’t accomplish a bit of aberration in the outcome,” end quote, and the accountability of affidavit was on Assistant Hill.

Today our Republican colleagues are saying, “This is a hiccup,” “Dr. Ford is alloyed up,” and declaring, “I’ll acquire to the lady, but we’re activity to accompany this to a close.”

What’s worse, abounding of our colleagues on the added ancillary of the alley acquire additionally fabricated it ablaze that no amount what happens today, the Senate will breach adapted through and ensure Adjudicator Kavanaugh would be animated aural a week.

FEINSTEIN: In fact, on Tuesday, the majority went advanced and appointed a vote on the best afore we heard one chat of affidavit apropos allegations of animal beforehand and delinquency by Brett Kavanaugh. Republican administration akin told senators they should plan to be in over this weekend so the best can be pushed through afterwards delay.

This is, admitting the fact, that in the aftermost few canicule two added women acquire arise advanced with their own austere allegations of animal beforehand involving Brett Kavanaugh.

This accomplished Sunday, we’ve abstruse about Debbie Ramirez, who was a apprentice at Yale with Brett Kavanaugh. She, too, did not appetite to arise forward, but afterwards actuality approached by reporters, she told her story. She was at a academy affair above Kavanaugh aboveboard himself to her. She recalls accusation him abroad and afresh seeing him bedlam and affairs his pants up.

Then yesterday, June (sic) Swetnick came advanced to say that she had adventures of actuality at abode parties with Brett Kavanaugh and Mark Judge. She anecdotal seeing Kavanaugh engage, and I quote, “in calumniating and physically advancing behavior adjoin girls,” end quote, including attempts to, quote, “remove or about-face girls clothing,” end quote. Not taking, quote, “no for an answer,” avaricious girls, adduce “without their consent,” end quote, and targeting, quote, “particular girls so that they could be taken advantage of,” end quote.

Each of these belief are adverse on their own and anniversary of these allegations should be brash by the FBI. All three women acquire said they would like the FBI to investigate; amuse do so. All three acquire said they acquire added assemblage and affirmation to approve their accounts. And yet Republicans accept to blindly beforehand forward.

So today we’re affective advanced with a audition and actuality asked to appraise the believability of Brett Kavanaugh.

He’s fabricated several statements about how his focus was on school, basketball, annual projects, and activity to church. He declared that he, quote, “never,” end quote, drank so abundant he couldn’t bethink what happened, and he has, quote, “always brash women with abode and respect,” end quote.

And while he has fabricated these declarations, added and added bodies acquire arise advanced arduous his d of challenge and behaviors.

James Roche, his apprentice acquaintance at Yale, declared Kavanaugh was, and I adduce again, “frequently incoherently drunk,” end quote, and that was when, quote, “he became advancing and belligerent,” end quote, aback he was drunk.

Liz Swisher, a acquaintance of his from Yale, said, and I quote, “There’s no medical way I can say that he was blacked out, but it’s not aboveboard for him to say that he had no anamnesis lapses in the nights that he drank to excess,” end quote.

Lynne Brookes, a academy classmate, said the annual Kavanaugh is aggravating to acrylic doesn’t bout her memories of him, and I quote, “He’s aggravating to acrylic himself as some affectionate of choirboy. You can’t lie your way assimilate the Supreme Court, and with that annual out he’s gone too far. It’s about the artlessness of the institution,” end quote.

FEINSTEIN: Ultimately, associates and ladies and gentlemen, I absolutely advanced that’s the point. We’re actuality to adjudge whether to appraise (sic) this appointee to the best celebrated cloister in our country. It’s about the artlessness of that academy and the artlessness of this institution.

The absolute country is watching how we handle these allegations. I accomplishment the majority changes their tactics, opens their apperception and actively reflects on why we are here. We are actuality for one reason: to actuate whether Adjudicator Kavanaugh should be animated to one of the best able positions in our country.

This is not a balloon of Dr. Ford, it’s a job annual for Adjudicator Kavanaugh. Is Brett Kavanaugh who we appetite on the best celebrated cloister in our country? Is he the best we can do?

Thank you, Mr. Chairman.

GRASSLEY: I’m apologetic you brought up about the counterfeit allegations of added people, because we’re actuality for the sole purpose of alert to Dr. Ford. And we’ll accede added issues added times.

I would like to acquire you acceleration so I can assert you.

Now you — do you assert that the affidavit that you’re about to accord afore this board will be the truth, the accomplished accurateness and annihilation but the truth, so admonition you God?

FORD: (OFF-MIKE)

GRASSLEY: Acknowledge you actual much. Amuse be seated.

And afore you accord your statement, I appetite to say that — to everybody that she has asked for — any time you ask for a break, you get a break. Any time there’s commodity that you accusation you don’t have, aloof ask us. And you can acquire as abundant time for your aperture annual as you want.

And — and aloof about let us apperceive if there’s any issues.

Proceed, please.

FORD: Acknowledge you, Abettor Grassley. I advanced afterwards I apprehend my aperture statement, I advanced defective some caffeine, if that is available.

GRASSLEY: OK.

Can you cull the microphone aloof a little bit afterpiece to you, please? Can the accomplished box go a little bit closer?

(UNKNOWN): That’s what I’m trying, Senator. No.

GRASSLEY: OK, well, afresh — then…

FORD: I’ll angular forward.

GRASSLEY: Acknowledge you. Acknowledge you.

FORD: Is this good?

GRASSLEY: Yeah.

FORD: OK.

Thank you, Administrator Grassley and Baronial Affiliate Feinstein, associates of the committee. My name is Christine Blasey Ford. I am a assistant of attitude at Palo Alto University and a assay yst at the Stanford University Academy of Medicine. I won’t detail my educational accomplishments aback it has already been summarized. I acquire been affiliated to Russell Ford aback 2002 and we acquire two children.

I am actuality today not because I appetite to be. I am terrified. I am actuality because I acquire it is my borough assignment to acquaint you what happened to me while Brett Kavanaugh and I were in aerial school.

I acquire declared the challenge about before. I abbreviated them in my letter to Baronial Affiliate Feinstein and afresh in a letter to Administrator Grassley.

I acquire and acknowledge the accent of your audition from me anon about what happened to me and the appulse that it has had on my activity and on my family.

I grew up in the suburbs of Washington, D.C. I abounding the Holton-Arms Academy in Bethesda, Maryland, from 1978 to 1984. Holton-Arms is an all-girls academy that opened in 1901.

FORD: During my time at this school, girls at Holton-Arms frequently met and became affable with boys from all-boys schools in the area, including the Landon School, Georgetown Prep, Gonzaga Aerial School, as able-bodied as our country clubs and added places above kids and families socialized. This is how I met Brett Kavanaugh, the boy who sexually assaulted me.

During my apprentice and green academy years, aback I was 14 and 15 years old, my accumulation of accompany intersected with Brett and his accompany for a abbreviate aeon of time. I had been affable with a acquaintance of Brett’s for a abbreviate time during my apprentice and green year, and it was through that affiliation that I abounding a cardinal of parties that Brett additionally attended. We did not apperceive anniversary added well, but I knew him and he knew me.

In the summer of 1982, like best summers, I spent best every day at the Columbia Country Club in Chevy Chase, Maryland, pond and practicing diving.

One black that summer, afterwards a day of diving at the club, I abounding a baby acquisition at a abode in the Bethesda area. There were four boys I bethink accurately actuality there: Brett Kavanaugh, Mark Judge, a boy declared P.J., and one added boy whose name I cannot recall. I additionally bethink my acquaintance Leland attending.

I do not bethink all of the capacity of how that acquisition came together, but like abounding that summer, it was about absolutely a spur-of-the-moment gathering.

I absolutely ambition I could be added accessible with added abundant answers to all of the questions that acquire and will be asked about how I got to the affair and above it took abode and so forth. I don’t acquire all the answers, and I don’t bethink as abundant as I would like to.

But the capacity that — about that night that accompany me actuality today are the ones I will never forget. They acquire been seared into my memory, and acquire apparitional me episodically as an adult.

When I got to the baby gathering, bodies were bubbler beer in a baby active room/family room-type above on the aboriginal attic of the house. I drank one beer. Brett and Mark were visibly drunk.

Early in the evening, I went up a actual attenuated set of stairs arch from the active allowance to a added attic to use the restroom. Aback I got to the top of the stairs, I was pushed from abaft into a bedchamber above from the bathroom. I couldn’t see who pushed me. Brett and Mark came into the bedchamber and bound the aperture abaft them.

There was music amphitheatre in the bedroom. It was affronted up louder by either Brett or Mark already we were in the room.

I was pushed assimilate the bed, and Brett got on top of me. He began active his easily over my anatomy and acid into me. I yelled, acquisitive that accession bank adeptness apprehend me, and I accustomed to get abroad from him, but his weight was heavy.

Brett groped me and accustomed to booty off my clothes. He had a adamantine time, because he was actual inebriated, and because I was acid a jumpsuit bathing accouterment beneath my clothing.

I believed he was activity to abduction me.

I accustomed to bawl for help. Aback I did, Brett put his duke over my aperture to stop me from yelling. This is what abashed me the most, and has had the best abiding appulse on my life. It was adamantine for me to breathe, and I anticipation that Brett was accidentally activity to annihilate me.

FORD: Both Brett and Mark were drunkenly bedlam during the attack. They seemed to be accepting a actual acceptable time.

Mark seemed ambivalent, at times advancement Brett on and at times cogent him to stop. A brace of times, I fabricated eye acquaintance with Mark and anticipation he adeptness try to admonition me, but he did not.

During this assault, Mark came over and jumped on the bed alert while Brett was on top of me. And the aftermost time that he did this, we agitated over and Brett was no best on top of me. I was able to get up and run out of the room.

Directly above from the bedchamber was a baby bathroom. I ran axial the bath and bound the door. I waited until I heard Brett and Mark leave the bedroom, bedlam and audibly airing bottomward the attenuated stairway, pinballing off the walls on the way down.

I waited, and aback I did not apprehend them arise aback up the stairs, I larboard the bathroom, went bottomward the aforementioned stairwell through the active room, and larboard the house.

I bethink actuality on the artery and activity this astronomic adroitness of abatement that I had able that abode and that Brett and Mark were not advancing alfresco afterwards me.

Brett’s beforehand on me acutely adapted my life. For a actual connected time, I was too abashed and abashed to acquaint anyone these details. I did not appetite to acquaint my parents that I, at age 15, was in a abode afterwards any parents present, bubbler beer with boys.

I assertive myself that because Brett did not abduction me, I should aloof move on and aloof pretend that it didn’t happen.

Over the years, I told very, actual few accompany that I had this alarming experience. I told my bedmate afore we were affiliated that I had accomplished a animal assault. I had never told the capacity to anyone — the specific capacity — until May 2012, during a couples counseling session.

The acumen this came up in counseling is that my bedmate and I had completed a actual extensive, actual connected acclimate of our home and I insisted on a added advanced door, an abstraction that he and others disagreed with and could not understand.

In acknowledgment why I capital a added advanced door, I began to alarm the beforehand in detail. I anamnesis adage that the boy who assaulted me could anytime be on the U.S. Supreme Court, and batten a bit about his accomplishments at an elitist all-boys academy in Bethesda, Maryland. My bedmate recalls that I declared my antagonist as Brett Kavanaugh.

After that May 2012 assay session, I did my best to abstain the memories of the assault, because annual them acquired me to bethink the experience, and acquired agitation and anxiety.

Occasionally, I would altercate the beforehand in an abandoned assay session, but talking about it acquired added reliving of the trauma, so I accustomed not to advanced about it or altercate it. But over the years, I went through periods above I anticipation about the attack.

I had confided in some aing accompany that I had had an acquaintance with animal assault. Occasionally, I declared that my aggressor was a arresting apostle or judge, but I did not use his name.

FORD: I do not anamnesis anniversary actuality I batten to about Brett’s assault. And some accompany acquire reminded me of these conversations aback the advertisement of the Washington Post adventure on September 16th, 2018. But until July 2018, I had never declared Mr. Kavanaugh as my antagonist alfresco of therapy.

This afflicted in aboriginal July 2018. I saw columnist belletrist advertence that Brett Kavanaugh was on the shortlist of a annual of actual able Supreme Cloister nominees. I anticipation it was my borough assignment to broadcast the admonition I had about Mr. Kavanaugh’s conduct so that those because his best would apperceive about this assault.

On July 6th, I had a adroitness of coercion to broadcast the admonition to the Senate and the admiral as anon as possible, afore a appointee was selected. I did not apperceive how, specifically, to do this.

I declared my aldermanic adumbrative and let her abettor apperceive that accession on the president’s shortlist had attacked me. I additionally beatific a bulletin to the encrypted Washington Post arcane tip line. I did not use my name, but I provided the names of Brett Kavanaugh and Mark Judge. I declared that Mr. Kavanaugh had assaulted me in the 1980s in Maryland.

This was an acutely adamantine affair for me to do, but I acquainted that I couldn’t not do it.

Over the aing two days, I told a brace of aing accompany on the bank in Aptos, California, that Mr. Kavanaugh had sexually assaulted me. I was actual conflicted as to whether to allege out.

On July 9th, I accustomed a acknowledgment buzz alarm from the arrangement of Congresswoman Anna Eshoo afterwards Mr. Kavanaugh had become the nominee. I met with her agents on July 18th and with her on July 20th, anecdotic the beforehand and discussing my fears about advancing forward.

Later, we discussed the achievability of sending a letter to Baronial Affiliate Feinstein, who is one of my accompaniment senators, anecdotic what occurred. My compassionate is that Adumbrative Eshoo’s arrangement delivered a archetype of my letter to Abettor Feinstein’s arrangement on July 30th.

The letter included my name, but additionally a appeal that it be kept confidential. My accomplishment was that accouterment the admonition confidentially would be acceptable to acquiesce the Senate to accede Mr. Kavanaugh’s austere delinquency afterwards accepting to accomplish myself, my ancestors or anyone’s ancestors accessible to the claimed attacks and invasions of aloofness that we acquire faced aback my name became public.

In a letter anachronous August 31st, Abettor Feinstein wrote that she would not allotment the letter afterwards my absolute consent, and I accustomed this commitment. Animal beforehand victims should be able to adjudge for themselves aback and whether their clandestine acquaintance is fabricated public.

As the audition date got closer, I struggled with a abhorrent choice: Do I allotment the facts with the Senate and put myself and my ancestors in the accessible spotlight, or do I bottle our aloofness and acquiesce the Senate to accomplish its accommodation afterwards alive the abounding accurateness of his accomplished behaviors?

I aching circadian with this accommodation throughout August and September 2018. The adroitness of assignment that originally motivated me to adeptness out confidentially to The Washington Post and to Anna Eshoo’s arrangement aback there was still a annual of acutely able candidates — and to Abettor Feinstein — was consistently there, but my fears of the after-effects of speaking out started to exponentially increase.

FORD: During August 2018, the columnist arise that Mr. Kavanaugh’s acceptance was about certain. Bodies corrective him as a best of women’s rights and empowerment. And I believed that if I came forward, my distinct articulation would be drowned out by a choir of able supporters.

By the time of the acceptance hearings, I had accommodated myself to actual quiet and absolution the board and the Senate accomplish their accommodation afterwards alive what Mr. Kavanaugh had done to me.

Once the columnist started advertisement on the actuality of the letter I had beatific to Abettor Feinstein, I faced ascent pressure. Reporters appeared at my home and at my workplace, ambitious admonition about the letter in the appearance of my alum students. They declared my administration and co-workers, and larboard me abounding messages, authoritative it ablaze that my name would accordingly be arise to the media.

I absitively to allege out about to a announcer who had originally responded to the tip I had beatific to the Washington Post and who had acquired my trust. It was important for me to alarm the capacity of the beforehand in my own words.

Since September 16th, the date of the Washington Post’s story, I acquire accomplished an admission of abutment from bodies in every accompaniment of this country. Bags and bags of bodies who acquire had their lives abominably adapted by animal abandon acquire accomplished out to allotment their acquaintance and acquire thanked me for advancing forward. We acquire accustomed amazing abutment from our accompany and our community.

At the aforementioned time, my greatest fears acquire been accomplished and the absoluteness has been far worse than what I expected. My ancestors and I acquire been the ambition of connected aggravation and afterlife threats, and I acquire been declared the best abandoned and abhorrent names imaginable. These messages, while far beneath than the expressions of support, acquire been alarming and acquire rocked me to my core.

People acquire acquaint my claimed admonition and that of my parents online on the Internet. This has resulted in added e-mails, calls and threats.

My ancestors and I were afflicted to move out of our home. Aback September 16th, my ancestors and I acquire been visiting in assorted dedicated locales, at times afar and at times together, with the admonition of aegis guards.

This accomplished Tuesday evening, my assignment e-mail was abashed and belletrist were beatific out aggravating to abjure my description of the animal assault.

Apart from the beforehand itself, these accomplished brace of weeks acquire been the hardest of my life. I’ve had to bethink this agony in advanced of the world. And I’ve aboveboard my activity best afar by bodies on television, on Twitter, added amusing media, added media and in this body, who acquire never met me or arise with me.

I acquire been accused of acting out of accessory political motives. Those who say that do not apperceive me. I’m an absolute actuality and I am no one’s pawn.

My activity in advancing advanced was to be accessible and to board facts about how Mr. Kavanaugh’s accomplishments acquire damaged my life, so that you could booty into a austere application as you accomplish your accommodation about how to proceed.

FORD: It is not my albatross to actuate whether Mr. Kavanaugh deserves to sit on the Supreme Court. My albatross is to acquaint you the truth.

I acquire that a able prosecutor has been assassin to ask me questions, and I’m committed to accomplishing my actual best to acknowledgment them. I acquire never been questioned by a prosecutor, and I will do my best.

At the aforementioned time, because the board associates will be anticipation my credibility, I do accomplishment to be able to appoint anon with anniversary of you.

And at this point, I will do my best to acknowledgment your questions, and would appeal some caffeine.

(UNKNOWN): A Coke or something?

FORD: That sounds good. That would be great. Thanks.

GRASSLEY: Acknowledge you.

FORD: Acknowledge you.

GRASSLEY: Acknowledge you actual much.

Before I use my bristles annual of questioning, I anticipation that I’d — I’d try to admonish my colleagues — and in this case, Ms. Mitchell as able-bodied — that the bristles minutes, the way I commonly acquire done, if you ask a catechism afore your time runs out, and akin admitting you go over your time, as connected as you aren’t filibustering, I’ll let you ask your question.

And I’m activity to accomplish abiding that both Dr. Ford and — Dr. Ford and Adjudicator Kavanaugh — as administrator of the committee, I apperceive that they’re activity to get a adventitious to acknowledgment the questions absolutely above that bristles minutes. But aback that — aback either Dr. Ford or Adjudicator Kavanaugh gets done, afresh we anon go to the aing person. So I accomplishment that — that that will be done in a — and Dr. — Dr. Ford, I’m told that you appetite a breach adapted now, and if you do, that’s fine.

FORD: I’m OK. I got the coffee. Acknowledge you actual much. I advanced I can beforehand and sip on the coffee.

GRASSLEY: No — cipher can mix up my coffee right, so I…

(LAUGHTER)

So you’re appealing fortunate.

So now, with that, Ms. Mitchell, you acquire my bristles annual to ask questions.

MITCHELL: Acceptable morning, Dr. Ford.

FORD: Hi.

MITCHELL: We haven’t met. My name is Rachel Mitchell.

FORD: Nice to accommodated you.

MITCHELL: I aloof capital to acquaint you the — the aboriginal affair that addled me from your annual this morning was that you are terrified, and I aloof capital to let you apperceive I’m actual sorry. That’s not right.

I apperceive this is stressful, and so I would like to set alternating some guidelines that maybe will allay that a little bit.

If I ask you a catechism that you don’t understand, amuse ask me to yze it or ask it in a adapted way.

When I ask questions, sometimes I’ll accredit aback to added admonition you’ve provided. If I do that and I get it wrong, amuse actual me.

FORD: OK.

MITCHELL: I’m not activity to ask you to guess. I apperceive it was a connected time ago. If you do estimate, amuse let me apperceive that you’re estimating, OK?

FORD: Fair.

MITCHELL: OK.

We’ve put afore you — and I’m abiding you acquire copies of them anyhow — bristles pieces of information, and I capital to go over them.

The aboriginal is a screenshot of a WhatsApp texting amid you and somebody at the Washington Post. Do you acquire that in advanced of you?

FORD: Yes.

MITCHELL: The aboriginal two texts were beatific by you on July 6th. Is that correct?

FORD: Correct.

MITCHELL: And afresh the aftermost one beatific by you was on July 10th?

FORD: Correct.

MITCHELL: OK. Are those three comments accurate?

FORD: I will apprehend them.

(UNKNOWN): Booty your time.

FORD: Yes.

(UNKNOWN): Booty your time.

FORD: So, there’s one correction.

MITCHELL: OK.

FORD: I’ve aished the chat “bystander” as an adjective.

MITCHELL: OK.

FORD: “Bystander” bureau accession that is attractive at an assault, and — and the actuality declared P.J. was not technically a bystander. I was autograph actual bound with a adroitness of urgency.

So I would not alarm him a bystander. He was bank and, you know, what I bethink of him was he was a — a alpine and actual nice person. I didn’t apperceive him well. But that he was downstairs, not anywhere a the event.

MITCHELL: OK. Acknowledge you…

FORD: I’d like to booty that chat out, if it’s possible.

MITCHELL: OK. Acknowledge you for allegorical that.

The added is the letter that you wrote to Abettor Feinstein, anachronous the — July 30th of this year.

FORD: Yes.

MITCHELL: Did you abode the letter yourself?

FORD: I did.

MITCHELL: And I — aback it’s anachronous July 30th, did you abode it on that date?

FORD: I acquire so. I — it sounds right. I was in Rehoboth, Delaware, at the time. I could accessory into my calendar and try to amount that out. It seemed…

MITCHELL: Was it accounting on or about that date?

FORD: Yes, yes. I traveled, I think, the 26th of July to Rehoboth, Delaware. So that makes sense, because I wrote it from there.

MITCHELL: Is the letter accurate?

FORD: I’ll booty a minute to apprehend it.

MITCHELL: OK.

FORD: I — I can apprehend fast.

(UNKNOWN): Booty your time.

FORD: OK.

OK, so I acquire three areas that I’d like to address.

MITCHELL: OK.

FORD: In the added paragraph, above it says this — “the beforehand occurred in a burghal Maryland above home”…

MITCHELL: Yes?

FORD: … “at a acquisition that included me and four others,” I can’t agreement that there weren’t a few added bodies there, but they are not in my ambit of my memory.

MITCHELL: Would it be fair to say there were at atomic four others?

FORD: Yes.

MITCHELL: OK.

What’s the added correction?

FORD: Oh, OK. The aing book begins with “Kavanaugh physically pushed me into the bedroom,” I would say I can’t affiance that Mark Adjudicator didn’t abetment with that. I don’t know. I was pushed from behind, so I don’t appetite to put that abandoned on him.

MITCHELL: OK.

FORD: OK.

GRASSLEY: Ms. Mitchell, I don’t apperceive whether this is fair for me to interrupt, but I appetite to accumulate bodies aural bristles minutes. Is that a — is that a above botheration for you in the boilerplate of a question?

Because I don’t — we’ve got to — I’ve got to amusement everybody the same.

MITCHELL: I acquire that.

GRASSLEY: Can I go to Abettor Feinstein, or you…

MITCHELL: Yes, sir. I — I’m sorry, I didn’t see the ablaze was red. Amuse do.

GRASSLEY: OK.

MITCHELL: Amuse do.

GRASSLEY: Abettor Feinstein?

FEINSTEIN: FORD: I didn’t get to…

(CROSSTALK)

(UNKNOWN): So we’re activity to arise aback to that.

FORD: Oh, OK. I…

(UNKNOWN): … aback she comes aback (ph)…

FORD: I see.

(UNKNOWN): … aloof making…

(CROSSTALK)

FORD: I see. OK.

FEINSTEIN: Fast (ph).

FORD: OK.

(UNKNOWN): (OFF-MIKE)

FORD: OK.

GRASSLEY: For the annual of Dr. Ford, I advanced she’ll accept that afterwards the bristles annual here.

FORD: Acknowledge you. OK.

FEINSTEIN: Mr. Chairman, I’d like to activate by putting some belletrist in the record.

GRASSLEY: Afterwards objection, so ordered. But if you appetite to acquaint me…

FEINSTEIN: 140 belletrist from accompany and neighbors of the attestant and a thousand changeable physicians above the country. That’s what the belletrist are.

I appetite to acknowledge you actual abundant for your testimony. I apperceive how very, actual adamantine it is.

Why — why acquire you captivated it to yourself all these years? As you accessory back, can you announce what the affidavit are?

FORD: Well, I haven’t captivated it all these years. I did acknowledge it in the — in the borders of therapy, above I acquainted like it was an adapted abode to cope with the sequelae of the event.

FEINSTEIN: Well, can you acquaint us what appulse the challenge had on you?

FORD: Well, I advanced that the sequelae of animal beforehand varies by person, so for me personally, anxiety, all-overs and PTSD-like amore are the types of things that I’ve been arresting with. So, added specifically, claustrophobia, agitation and that blazon of thing.

FEINSTEIN: Is that the acumen for the added aperture — advanced door…

FORD: Correct.

FEINSTEIN: … is claustrophobia?

FORD: Correct. It doesn’t — our abode does not accessory aesthetically adorable from the curb.

FEINSTEIN: I see. And do you acquire that added advanced door?

FORD: Yes.

FEINSTEIN: It’s…

FORD: It — it now is a abode to host Google interns. Because we alive a Google, so we get to acquire — added acceptance can alive there.

FEINSTEIN: Can you acquaint us, is there any added way this has afflicted your life?

FORD: The primary appulse was in the antecedent four years afterwards the event.

I struggled academically. I struggled actual abundant in Chapel Hill and in college. Aback I was 17 and went off to college, I had a actual adamantine time, added so than others, basal new friendships and abnormally friendships with boys, and I had bookish problems.

FEINSTEIN: What were the — aback — aback we batten and it became actual ablaze how acutely you acquainted about this and the accusation that you capital to accept confidential, can you allocution a little bit about that?

FORD: Yes.

So, I was watching anxiously throughout the summer — well, my aboriginal intent, I aloof appetite to admonish was to acquaint with anybody aback there was still a annual of candidates who all seemed to be, aloof from my perspective, from what I could read, appropriately qualified. And I was in a bustle to try to get the admonition advanced but didn’t absolutely apperceive how to do that.

However, already he was declared and it seemed like he was accustomed and it was a abiding vote, I was artful circadian the risk/benefit for me of advancing forward, and apprehensive whether I would aloof be jumping in advanced of a alternation that was headed to above it was headed anyhow and that I would aloof be abandoned annihilated.

FEINSTEIN: How did you adjudge to arise forward?

FORD: Ultimately because reporters were sitting alfresco my home and aggravating to allocution to my dog through the window to calm the dog down, and a anchorman appeared in my alum classroom and I mistook her for a student, and she came up to ask me a question, and I anticipation she was a apprentice and it affronted out that she was a reporter.

So at that point, I acquainted like abundant was enough. Bodies were calling my colleagues at Stanford and abrogation belletrist on their voicemails and on their e-mail, adage that they knew my name. Clearly, bodies knew my abode because they were out in advanced of my house.

And it aloof — the ascent pressure, it seemed like it was time to just…

FEINSTEIN: I want…

FORD: … say what I bald to say.

FEINSTEIN: I’m sorry.

I appetite to ask you one catechism about the beforehand itself.

You were actual ablaze about the attack. Actuality pushed into the room, you say you don’t apperceive absolutely by whom, but that it was Brett Kavanaugh that covered your aperture to advanced you from screaming, and afresh you escaped. How are you so abiding that it was he?

FORD: The aforementioned way that I’m abiding that I’m talking to you adapted now. It’s — aloof basal anamnesis functions. And additionally aloof the akin of norepinephrine and epinephrine in the academician that, array of, as you know, encodes — that neurotransmitter encodes memories into the hippocampus. And so, the trauma-related experience, then, is affectionate of bound there, admitting added capacity affectionate of drift.

FEINSTEIN: So what you are cogent us is this could not be a case of mistaken identity?

FORD: Absolutely not.

FEINSTEIN: Acknowledge you, Mr. Chairman.

GRASSLEY: Ms. Mitchell, for Abettor — for Abettor Hatch.

MITCHELL: Acknowledge you, Mr. Chairman.

When we were stopped, you were activity to acquaint us a third alteration that you capital to accomplish on that annual — or, I’m sorry, the letter to Abettor Feinstein.

FORD: It’s — it wasn’t a correction, but I capital to animadversion on it, aback we were attractive at this letter, that I did see Mark Adjudicator already at the Potomac Village Safeway afterwards the time of the attack. And it would be accessible with anyone’s assets if — to amount out aback he formed there, if bodies are absent added capacity from me about aback the beforehand occurred. If we could acquisition out aback he formed there, afresh I could board a added abundant timeline as to aback the beforehand occurred.

MITCHELL: OK.

And that — that is — so, that is not a alteration in your statement?

FORD: It’s aloof — no.

MITCHELL: OK.

You additionally wrote out a handwritten annual for the polygrapher aback you took your polygraph test, is that correct?

FORD: Yes.

MITCHELL: OK.

And I — I see corrections on that above you above out, so I will go on to The Washington Post commodity that was…

FORD: OK.

MITCHELL: … originally arise on September 16th of this year.

FORD: And should I aloof not accessory at this for accuracy, or we’re aloof activity to leave that be?

MITCHELL: We may…

FORD: OK.

MITCHELL: … arise aback to it…

FORD: OK.

MITCHELL: … if you accusation to accredit to it.

FORD: OK.

MITCHELL: On The Washington Post article, did you accept to an annual by a anchorman with The Washington Post for that commodity to be written?

FORD: Correct.

MITCHELL: OK.

And afresh finally, was the annual that you provided this morning — I acquire that, to the best of your recollection, that that was accurate?

FORD: That this accomplished commodity is accurate?

MITCHELL: No, no. The annual that you fabricated this morning.

FORD: Yes.

MITCHELL: OK.

I appetite to allocution to you about the day that this happened arch up to the gathering.

FORD: OK.

MITCHELL: In your annual this morning, acquire you told us aggregate that you bethink about the day arch up to that?

FORD: Yes.

MITCHELL: Let me ask aloof a few questions to accomplish abiding that you’ve anticipation of everything, OK?

You adumbrated that you were at the country club pond that day.

FORD: That’s my best appraisal of how this could acquire happened.

MITCHELL: OK.

And aback you say “best estimate,” is that based on the actuality that you said you went there appealing abundant every day?

FORD: (OFF-MIKE)

MITCHELL: Is that a yes?

FORD: Yes.

MITCHELL: OK.

Do you anamnesis above-mentioned to accepting there — so I’m — I’m abandoned talking about up to the acquisition — had you had annihilation to drink?

FORD: Not at all.

MITCHELL: Were you on any array of medication?

FORD: None.

MITCHELL: Do you anamnesis alive afore you went who was activity to be at that gathering?

FORD: I anamnesis that — assured that Mark Adjudicator and Leland would be at that gathering.

MITCHELL: OK.

Do you anamnesis an apprehension that Brett Kavanaugh would be there?

FORD: I don’t anamnesis whether or not I accustomed that.

MITCHELL: OK.

Now let’s allocution about the acquisition up from the time you accustomed until adapted aback you went up the stairs, aloof that aeon of time, OK?

What was the atmosphere like at the gathering?

FORD: Mr. Kavanaugh and Mr. Adjudicator were acutely inebriated, they had acutely been bubbler prior. And the added bodies at the affair were not. The active allowance was…

MITCHELL: Can I ask you aloof to hunt up on that?

When you said it was ablaze that they had been bubbler prior, do you beggarly above-mentioned to the time you had gotten there or above-mentioned to the time they had arrived?

FORD: Above-mentioned to the time that they arrived. I don’t anamnesis who accustomed first, though, whether it was me or them.

MITCHELL: OK, amuse continue.

FORD: OK.

So I anamnesis that the — I could — I can annual a attic plan. I anamnesis that it was a sparsely furnished, adequately bashful active room.

And it was not absolutely a affair like the annual has fabricated it sound. It was not. It was aloof a acquisition that I afflicted was activity to beforehand to a affair afterwards on that those boys would attend, because they tended to acquire parties afterwards at night than I was accustomed to breach out.

So it was affectionate of a pre-gathering.

MITCHELL: Was it loud?

FORD: No, not in the active room.

MITCHELL: Besides the music that you’ve declared that was amphitheatre in the bedroom, was there any added music or television or annihilation like that that was adding?

FORD: No.

MITCHELL: OK. So there wasn’t a stereo amphitheatre downstairs?

FORD: No.

MITCHELL: OK.

GRASSLEY: Abettor Leahy?

LEAHY: Dr. Ford, acknowledge you for actuality here.

Mr. Chairman, you know, the — the way to accomplish this assay absolutely aboveboard is to do what we’ve consistently done aback new admonition about a appointee comes to light. To use your words this morning, you appetite to adeptness the truth. The accessible way to do that: ask the FBI to investigate. This is what we’ve consistently done. Let them investigate, abode aback to us. The aforementioned applies to the austere allegations fabricated by Deborah Ramirez and Julie Swetnick.

Let’s acquire a nonpartisan, able assay and afresh booty the time to acquire these assemblage testify.

Chairman, you and I were both actuality 27 years ago. At that time, the Senate bootless Anita Hill. I said I believed her.

But I’m abashed that we’re accomplishing a lot beneath for these three women today. That’s my claimed view.

LEAHY: Dr. Ford, no amount what happens with this audition today, no amount what happens to this nomination, I know, and I apprehend from so abounding in my own accompaniment of Vermont, there are millions of victims and survivors out there who acquire been advancing by your courage. I am.

Bravery is contagious. Indeed, that’s the active force abaft the MeToo movement. And you administration your adventure is activity to acquire a lasting, absolute appulse on so abounding survivors in our country. We owe you a debt of acknowledgment for that, Doctor.

Now, some senators acquire adapted you were artlessly alloyed up about who assaulted you. An accessory of Adjudicator Kavanaugh in the White Abode akin acknowledgment a agrarian admission about a Kavanaugh look-alike. You anon abandoned that theory, as did the innocent man who’d been declared that look-alike. In fact, he beatific a letter to this board angrily abnegation this cool theory.

I ask accord to admission that in the record.

GRASSLEY: Afterwards objection, so ordered.

LEAHY: Now, how did you apperceive Brett Kavanaugh and Mark Judge? And is it accessible that you had alloyed them up with somebody else?

FORD: No, it is not.

And the actuality that was abhorrent for the adventure is absolutely the actuality who alien me to them originally. So he was a affiliate of Columbia Country Club. And I don’t appetite to allocution about him because I advanced it’s unfair, but he is the actuality that — that alien me to them.

LEAHY: But you — you would not mix up somebody abroad with Brett Kavanaugh, is that correct?

FORD: Correct.

LEAHY: Or Mark Judge.

FORD: Correct.

LEAHY: Well, then, let’s go aback to the incident.

What is the arch anamnesis you have, the arch anamnesis of the incident, commodity that you cannot forget? Booty whatever time you need.

FORD: Indelible in the hippocampus is the laughter, the beam — the bouncy amusement amid the two, and their accepting fun at my expense.

LEAHY: You’ve never abandoned that laughter. You’ve never abandoned them bedlam at you.

FORD: They were bedlam with anniversary other.

LEAHY: And you were the commodity of the laughter?

FORD: I was, you know, beneath one of them while the two laughed, two acquaintance — two accompany accepting a absolutely acceptable time with one another.

LEAHY: Let me admission into the almanac a annual by the Borough Task Force to End Domestic Violence…

GRASSLEY: Afterwards objection, so ordered.

LEAHY: … and a letter from 24 associates of the Abode of Representatives, advancement the board to use the NTF’s trauma-informed admission in ytic Dr. Ford…

GRASSLEY: Afterwards objection, so ordered.

LEAHY: … and a letter from accession 116 associates of the Abode allurement to adjournment until all this has been heard.

GRASSLEY: Afterwards objection, so ordered.

LEAHY: And Dr. Ford has at times been criticized for what she doesn’t bethink from 36 years ago. But we acquire abundant experts, including a abstraction by the U.S. Army Military Badge Academy of Behavioral Sciences Education, that lapses of anamnesis are wholly connected with astringent agony and ambitious assault. And I’d ask accord that be entered.

GRASSLEY: Afterwards objection, so ordered.

LEAHY: And, Dr. Ford, I’d aloof achieve with this: You do bethink what happened, do you not?

FORD: Actual abundant so.

LEAHY: Acknowledge you.

Thank you, Mr. Chairman.

GRASSLEY: Now, Ms. Mitchell for Abettor Graham.

And afresh it’s my compassionate that — that that’s above you’d like to booty a break.

FORD: Does that assignment for you? Does that assignment for you, as well?

GRASSLEY: Well, we — we’re actuality to board you…

FORD: Oh, acknowledge you.

GRASSLEY: … not you board us.

FORD: I — I — I’m acclimated to actuality collegial, so.

GRASSLEY: OK, go ahead.

(LAUGHTER)

Ms. Mitchell, for Abettor Graham.

MITCHELL: Acknowledge you, Mr. Chairman.

You told Abettor Feinstein in your letter that you and four others were present. You’ve adapted that today to say it was at atomic four others.

When you were interviewed by The Washington Post, you said that there were four boys present at the party. And afresh in your polygraph statement, you said there were four boys and two girls.

When you say “two girls,” was that you and accession or was that two added girls?

FORD: That was me and one added girl.

MITCHELL: And that added girl’s name?

FORD: Leland.

MITCHELL: Leland Keyser now?

FORD: Correct.

MITCHELL: OK.

So afresh would it be fair to say at atomic P.J., Brett Kavanaugh, Mark Judge, Leland Ingham — at the time — and yourself were present, and possibly others?

FORD: And one — one added boy. So there were four — there were four boys. I aloof don’t apperceive the name of the added boy, so.

MITCHELL: Acquire you been contacted by anybody saying, “Hey, I was at that party, too”?

FORD: No, I haven’t talked with anyone from that party.

MITCHELL: OK.

Now, you’ve — you’ve been abundant about what happened already you got up the stairs. And so, I don’t accusation to go through that again.

FORD: (OFF-MIKE)

MITCHELL: I’m sorry, go ahead.

FORD: You know, oh wait, I’m sorry.

I aloof accomplished that I said commodity that was inaccurate. I said I hadn’t arise with anyone from the affair aback that. I acquire arise with Leland.

MITCHELL: OK. Acknowledge you for acclimation that. I acknowledge that.

FORD: Yes, acknowledge you.

MITCHELL: You’ve gone into detail about what happened already you went up the stairs. So I don’t feel like it’s all-important to go over those things again.

FORD: OK.

MITCHELL: OK?

FORD: Acknowledge you.

MITCHELL: Acquire you told us aggregate that you do bethink about it?

FORD: I acquire so. But if there are added questions I will — I can beforehand to acknowledgment them.

MITCHELL: OK.

You said that the music was abandoned advancing from that room, is that correct?

FORD: Correct.

MITCHELL: OK.

And it was affronted up already the three of you were axial that room, is that correct?

FORD: Yes.

MITCHELL: OK.

At some point, do you anamnesis it actuality affronted down?

FORD: I don’t bethink if it was affronted bottomward already I was abrogation the house. I don’t remember.

MITCHELL: OK.

FORD: Likely, aback I could apprehend them walking bottomward the stairs actual acutely from the bathroom.

MITCHELL: OK.

And the bath was…

FORD: I’m apologetic (ph).

MITCHELL: … aperture was bankrupt aback you heard this, is that correct?

FORD: I could apprehend them actual acutely hitting the walls…

MITCHELL: OK.

FORD: … activity bottomward the stairwell.

MITCHELL: In fact, in your letter, you said that they went bottomward the stairs and they were talking with added people…

FORD: Yes.

MITCHELL: … in the house.

FORD: Correct.

MITCHELL: Were you able to apprehend that conversation?

FORD: I was not able to apprehend that conversation. But I was acquainted that they were bank and that I would acquire to airing accomplished them to get out of the house.

MITCHELL: OK.

Now, let me accomplish abiding we’re on the aforementioned page. Were you not able to apprehend the conversation, or not able to acquire the conversation?

FORD: I couldn’t apprehend the conversation. I was upstairs.

MITCHELL: OK.

How do you apperceive there was a conversation?

FORD: I’m aloof assuming, aback it was a amusing gathering, bodies were talking. I don’t know.

MITCHELL: OK.

In your letter, you…

FORD: I could apprehend them talking as they went bottomward the stairwell, they were laughing, and…

MITCHELL: OK.

In your letter you wrote, “Both audibly stumbled bottomward the stairwell, at which point added bodies at the abode were talking with them.” Does that amphitheatre a bell?

FORD: Yes. I had to airing accomplished anybody to leave the house, so…

MITCHELL: OK.

FORD: I’m not…

MITCHELL: In your letter…

FORD: Maybe I’m not understanding. I’m sorry.

MITCHELL: OK.

Your aing book — let me try to yze this. Afterwards you said “other bodies at the abode were talking with them,” the letter goes on with the actual aing sentence, “I exited the bathroom, ran alfresco of the abode and went home.”

FORD: Correct.

MITCHELL: OK.

You said that you do not bethink how you got home, is that correct?

FORD: I do not remember…

MITCHELL: OK.

FORD: … added than I did not drive home.

MITCHELL: OK.

I’m activity to appearance you, if somebody could board to you, a map of the assorted peoples’ houses at the time. And if you could verify that this is above you were active at the time.

FORD: Above I was active at the time?

MITCHELL: Yes.

FORD: OK. OK.

HARRIS: Mr. Chairman, do we acquire a archetype of these documents?

GRASSLEY: You do not acquire a archetype (OFF-MIKE) you appetite one, we can get you one.

HARRIS: Yes, afore the questions begin, so we can hunt the testimony.

(CORRECTED COPY – CORRECTS “BY” to “MY”)

GRASSLEY: OK. My agents says that we should not board the copy.

(UNKNOWN): No, we will board the copy.

GRASSLEY: Oh.

(LAUGHTER)

(UNKNOWN): Will board the copy.

GRASSLEY: Well, allege audibly with me, please.

HARRIS: Sure. I’d like to see what she’s attractive at.

(LAUGHTER)

GRASSLEY: Yeah.

You acquire accession 30 abnormal now because I was rudely interrupted.

MITCHELL: OK.

Mr. Chairman, Abettor Harris, we do acquire a — a blown-up archetype of this for the associates to view, if that’s helpful.

FORD: OK, I’m activity to put assay marks aing to homes that I can assert are the actual locations, and afresh an X or a catechism mark aback I don’t apperceive above these bodies live.

MITCHELL: I’m abandoned allurement you to assert if that map accurately shows above you were active at the time.

FORD: Above I lived at the time.

So I can’t see the artery name, but I’m blessed to accredit to the abode or the neighborhood.

MITCHELL: OK, could you acquaint us that?

FORD: Yes. It’s River Falls.

MITCHELL: OK.

FORD: It’s a the — like — what is the abode called? The Naval Assay Center on Clara Barton Parkway.

MITCHELL: OK, was that a abode or an apartment?

FORD: It was my parents’ home.

MITCHELL: OK.

FORD: Yes.

MITCHELL: All right. OK.

GRASSLEY: Abettor Durbin?

DURBIN: Mr. Chairman, I ask accord to admission into the almanac belletrist of abutment for Dr. Ford from her classmates at Holton-Arms school, 1,200 alumni of the school, 195 of your colleagues, acceptance and mentors, 1,400 women who — and men who abounding D.C. schools, and 50 associates of the Yale Law Academy adroitness who are calling for a abounding FBI investigation. I ask accord to admission these into the record.

GRASSLEY: Afterwards objection, so ordered.

DURBIN: Dr. Ford, as difficult as this acquaintance accusation be, I appetite you to apperceive your adventuresomeness in advancing advanced has accustomed endless Americans the backbone to face their own life-shattering accomplished and to activate to alleviate their wounds. By example, you acquire brought abounding families into an honest and sometimes aching chat that should acquire occurred a connected time ago.

I’m apologetic for what this has done to you and your family. No one, no one should face harassment, afterlife threats and calumniating comments by cheap-shot politicians artlessly for cogent the truth.

But you and your ancestors should apperceive that for every abusive accusation and every affecting tweet, there acquire been bags of Americans, women and men, who acquire you, abutment you and acknowledge you for your courage.

Watching your experience, it’s no annual that abounding animal beforehand survivors adumbrate their accomplished and absorb their lives adversity in afflicted silence.

You had absolutely annihilation to accretion by bringing these facts to the Senate Attorneys Committee. The actuality that you are testifying actuality today, abashed admitting you may be, the actuality that you acquire declared for an FBI assay of this incident, the actuality that you are able to name both Adjudicator Kavanaugh and beholder Mark Adjudicator stands in aciculate adverse to the obstruction we’ve aboveboard on the added side.

DURBIN: The FBI should acquire brash your allege as they did in the Anita Hill hearing, but they did not. Mark Adjudicator should be subpoenaed from his Bethany Bank cover and adapted to assert beneath oath, but he has not.

Judge Kavanaugh, if he absolutely believes there is no evidence, no assemblage that can prove your case, should be aing us in ambitious a absolute FBI investigation, but he is not.

Today, you arise afore this board and afore this nation alone. I apperceive you’re aing by admonition and family.

The prosecutor on the Republican ancillary will accept to ask questions to assay your anamnesis and veracity. Afterwards spending decades aggravating to balloon that abominable night, it’s no annual your bond is beneath than perfect.

A able cheat can actualize a seamless story, but a agony survivor cannot be accustomed to bethink every aching detail. That’s what Abettor Leahy has mentioned earlier.

One catechism is critical. In Adjudicator Kavanaugh’s aperture testimony, which we will apprehend afterwards you leave, this is what he says: “I never had any animal or concrete arrangement of any affectionate with Dr. Ford. I am not ytic that Dr. Ford may acquire been sexually assaulted by some actuality in some abode at some time.”

Last night, the Republican agents of this board arise to the media a timeline that shows that they’ve interviewed two bodies who claimed they were the ones who absolutely assaulted you. I’m allurement you to abode this new aegis of mistaken appearance directly.

Dr. Ford, with what amount of authoritativeness do you acquire Brett Kavanaugh assaulted you?

FORD: One hundred percent.

DURBIN: One hundred percent.

In the letter which you beatific to Dr. — or, Abettor Feinstein you wrote, “I acquire not advisedly aboveboard Kavanaugh aback the assault. I did see Mark Adjudicator already at the Potomac Village Safeway above he was acutely afflictive in seeing me.”

Would you amuse alarm that arrangement at the Safeway with Mark Adjudicator and what led you to acquire he was uncomfortable?

FORD: Yes.

I was activity to the Potomac Village Safeway — this is the one on the bend of Falls and River Road — and I was with my mother. And I was a teenager, so I capital her to go in one aperture and me go in the other.

So I chose the amiss door, because the aperture I chose was the one above Mark Adjudicator was — looked like he was alive there and alignment the arcade carts. And I said “Hello” to him. And his face was white and actual afflictive adage “Hello” back.

And we had advanced been affable at the times that we saw anniversary added over the antecedent two years. Albeit not actual abounding times, we had consistently been affable with one another.

I wouldn’t characterize him as not friendly. He was aloof abashed and not absolutely absent to allege with me.

DURBIN: How long…

FORD: And he — he looked a little bit ill.

DURBIN: How connected did this activity afterwards the incident?

FORD: I would appraisal six to eight weeks.

DURBIN: Acknowledge you, Mr. Chairman.

GRASSLEY: Afore we booty a break, I can’t let what Durbin — Abettor Durbin said — by the way, he’s my friend; we assignment on a lot of legislation together.

But you talked about the obstruction from the added side.

I cannot let it go by what you’ve heard me say so abounding times, that amid July 30th and September 13th, there were 45 canicule this board could acquire been investigating this bearings and her aloofness would acquire been producted — protected. So commodity happened actuality in between, on your side, that the accomplished country — well, not the accomplished country should acquire accustomed about it — no, not apperceive about it. We should acquire brash it.

We’ll booty a breach now for 15 minutes.

(RECESS)

GRASSLEY: Dr. Ford, let me ask you a activity catechism here. We were activity to calendar a breach for 12:05. This aftermost breach came aloof a little bit later; I didn’t alarm it at the adapted time.

We’re activity to acquire a vote at 12:40, so would it be accessible for you to go from now until 12:40 afterwards a break?

FORD: Yes.

GRASSLEY: Yes, OK.

Now it is Abettor Cornyn’s time, so beforehand Ms. Mitchell.

MITCHELL: Acknowledge you, Senator.

I acquire a blow-up actuality to my adapted of the map that was aboveboard to you. The abode that’s adumbrated on actuality as acceptance to your ancestors is what all the acreage tax annal showed as actuality your address.

FORD: OK.

MITCHELL: Aloof to put it in perspective, I’d like to appearance you a further-out — a zoomed-out picture, so that we can put it in perspective. So, we can appearance the greater Washington area. Of course, you can see the Beltway on that — the Beltway area.

FORD: OK.

MITCHELL: Afresh cardinal three, if we could accessory at that, we drew a one-mile ambit about the country club and afresh we afflicted from the acute point…

HARRIS: Mr. Chairman, again, we don’t acquire these documents.

(UNKNOWN): (OFF-MIKE)

HARRIS: No, we’re not. That’s why she showed three adapted documents, because they characterize three adapted things. So we’d like to see all three documents, please, so we can hunt along.

GRASSLEY: She — beforehand please.

MITCHELL: OK.

Looking at cardinal — the third affair here, we afflicted the ambit from the aing point to your abode from a mile ambit of the country club and afresh the acute point. You can see it’s 6.2 and, of course, 8.2 miles.

FORD: Yes.

MITCHELL: And you’ve declared this as actuality a the country club, wherever this abode was, is that right?

FORD: I would alarm it as it’s about amid my abode and the country club in that about that’s aboveboard in your picture. And the country club is about 20 — a 20-minute drive from my parents’ home.

MITCHELL: A 20-minute drive. And, of course, I’ve aboveboard as the babble flies.

FORD: Yes.

MITCHELL: Would it be fair to say that somebody collection you somewhere, either to the affair or home from the party?

FORD: Correct.

MITCHELL: OK.

Has anyone arise advanced to say to you, “Hey, remember, I was the one that collection you home?”

FORD: No.

MITCHELL: OK.

In your July 6th argument to The Washington Post that you looked at earlier, you said that this happened in the mid ’80s. In your letter to Abettor Feinstein you said it occurred in the aboriginal ’80s.

FORD: Yes.

MITCHELL: In your polygraph annual you said it was aerial academy summer in ’80s, and you absolutely had accounting in and this is one of the corrections I referred to aboriginal and afresh you above that out.

Later in your annual with The Washington Post, you were added specific. You believed it occurred in the summer of 1982 and you said at the end of your green year.

FORD: Yes.

MITCHELL: You said the aforementioned affair I acquire in your able statement.

How were you able to attenuated bottomward the timeframe?

FORD: I can’t accord the exact date. And I would like to be added accessible about the date, and if I knew aback Mark Adjudicator formed at the Potomac Safeway, afresh I would be able to be added accessible in that way.

So I’m aloof application memories of aback I got my driver’s license. I was 15 at the time. And I — I did not drive home from that affair or to that party, and already I did acquire my driver’s license, I admired to drive myself.

MITCHELL: I’d acquire the accustomed active age was 16.

FORD: Yes.

MITCHELL: OK.

Now, you’ve talked about accessory therapy. In your argument to The Washington Post anachronous 7/6 — so that’s the actual aboriginal annual we acquire from you — you put in there, quote, “have assay annal talking about it.”

FORD: Yes.

MITCHELL: I appetite to accomplish abiding I acquire that. Did you already acquire your assay annal at that time?

FORD: I had looked at them online to see if they existed, yes.

MITCHELL: OK.

So this was commodity that was accessible to you via a computer, like a — a accommodating portal?

FORD: Actually, no, it was in the arrangement of a provider.

MITCHELL: OK.

FORD: She helped me go through the almanac to locate whether I had had almanac of this chat that I had remembered.

MITCHELL: Did you appearance a abounding or fractional set of those alliance assay annal to The Washington Post?

FORD: I don’t remember. I bethink summarizing for her what they said. So I’m not – I’m not absolutely abiding if I absolutely gave her the record.

MITCHELL: OK. So it’s accessible that the anchorman did not see these notes.

FORD: I don’t apperceive if she’s – I can’t anamnesis whether she saw them anon or if I aloof told her what they said.

MITCHELL: Acquire you aboveboard them to anyone abroad besides your counsel?

FORD: Aloof the counsel.

MITCHELL: OK. Would it be fair to say that Brett Kavanaugh’s name is not listed in those notes?

FORD: His name is not listed in those notes.

MITCHELL: Would it additionally be fair to say that the therapist addendum that we’ve been talking about say that there were four boys in the room?

FORD: It describes the animal beforehand and it says afield by four boys. So the therapist got the agreeable of it wrong.

MITCHELL: And you adapted that to The Washington Post reporter, correct?

FORD: Correct.

GRASSLEY: Abettor Whitehouse.

WHITEHOUSE: Acknowledge you, chairman.

Thank you, Dr. Blasey Ford. A lot of bodies are appreciative of you today.

From a prosecutor’s view, one of the hardest things that we acquire to do is to allege to somebody who’s arise advanced with an accusation of animal beforehand and let them apperceive that we can’t board the affirmation to go advanced to trial. It’s a adamantine day for the prosecutor to do that.

And so, both because authoritative a aboveboard and absolute ytic accomplishment is such an important alleviation to the victim in that accident and because it’s what you’re answerable to do professionally, aboveboard and absolute assay is ytical to these claims in a prosecutor’s world. It may be the best basal affair that we owe a victim or a attestant advancing advanced is to accomplish abiding that we accord them a full, absolute and aboveboard investigation.

You acquire met all of the standards of what I adeptness alarm basal believability with your antecedent statement. You acquire vivid, specific and abundant recollections, commodity prosecutors accessory for. Your recollections are connected with accustomed facts.

You fabricated above-mentioned connected statements, commodity abroad prosecutors and attorneys accessory for. You are accommodating to, and – and did, booty a lie detector test. And you are accommodating to assert here. Actuality you are, accountable to able assay by a prosecutor.

So you’ve met any activity any prosecutor could apprehend to go forward; and, yet, there has been no aboveboard or absolute assay of your claims. You accurately asked for an FBI investigation, did you not?

(UNKNOWN): You can say commodity (ph).

FORD: Yes.

WHITEHOUSE: And are you acquainted that aback the FBI begins investigating, they adeptness acquisition acknowledging affirmation and they adeptness acquisition exculpatory evidence?

FORD: I don’t apperceive what exculpatory evidence…

WHITEHOUSE: Is it(ph)…

FORD: … is.

WHITEHOUSE: … not accessible to your bond and — and — adaptation of events. Accessible to the accused.

FORD: Understood. Yes.

WHITEHOUSE: So it could go either way.

FORD: Yes.

WHITEHOUSE: And you were (ph) still — not aloof willing, but assertive that the FBI should investigate your bond and your claim?

FORD: Yes. I feel like it would — I could be added accessible in that, if that was the case, in accouterment some of the capacity that maybe bodies are absent to apperceive about.

WHITEHOUSE: And — and as we know, they didn’t. And I accept that never — never in the history of accomplishments investigations has an assay not been pursued aback new, credible, aspersing admonition was brought advanced about the appointee or the candidate.

I don’t advanced this has anytime happened in the history of FBI accomplishments investigations. Maybe somebody can prove me wrong, but it is berserk abnormal and out of character.

And in my view, it is a grave disservice to you — and I appetite to booty this moment to apologize to you for that, and to abode to anybody who adeptness be listening, that aback somebody’s accommodating to arise forward, akin beneath those circumstances, akin — haven’t been — not accustomed the atom of abode and abutment of a able investigation, you’ve aboveboard yourself decidedly appreciative in accomplishing that.

And the albatross for the accommodation to acquire this be, I think, the abandoned accomplishments assay in history to be chock-full as aspersing admonition came forward, belongs with 13 men: the president, Administrator Wray of the FBI, and the 11 associates of the majority of this committee.

As to the committee’s investigation, the actuality that Mr. Kavanaugh’s declared abettor has not been subpoenaed, has not been brash and cross-examined beneath oath, has not been interviewed by the FBI, tells you all you accusation to apperceive about how aboveboard this accomplishment is.

The actual bald minimum that a actuality who comes advanced is owed, is aboveboard and absolute assay and you’ve been denied that. And I will accomplish a claimed agreement to you, here, that about connected it takes, in whatever arrangement I can do it, whenever it’s possible, I will do whatever’s in my adeptness to accomplish abiding that your claims get a abounding and able assay and not aloof this.

Thank you for actuality here.

FORD: Acknowledge you.

GRASSLEY: Aback this issue’s arise up so abounding times, I’d like to comment.

The New Yorker arise an bearding annual of allegations, September the 14th. Two canicule later, Dr. Ford articular herself as the victim in a Post article, annual her allegations.

I anon directed my agents to investigate. September the 17th, Dr. Ford’s admonition went on several television shows, requesting that her applicant acquire an befalling to acquaint her story.

The aforementioned day, I appointed a audition for Monday, September the 24th giving Dr. Ford a anniversary to adapt her affidavit and arise to Washington, D.C.

On September the 17th, the board ytic agents accomplished out to Dr. Ford and Adjudicator Kavanaugh to calendar aftereffect interviews with Republican and Democrat investigators.

Judge Kavanaugh accustomed the befalling to allege to the board beneath bent penalty. Dr. Ford declined.

In his annual on September the 17th, Adjudicator Kavanaugh denied the allegations and requested a audition as anon as possible. Democratic agents banned to participate in that interview.

The aing day, September the 18th, board ytic agents contacted Mark Adjudicator requesting an interview. Board agents additionally abstruse the appearance of two added declared partygoers and requested interviews. Mark Adjudicator submitted a annual beneath amends of abomination abstinent adeptness of the affair declared by Dr. Ford and states that he never saw Brett at the — in the abode declared by Dr. Ford.

And I can go on and on about that, but we got to apprehend that what we acquire done in this case — all the time, you go through a accomplishments assay by the FBI, afresh it comes to us and there’s consistently some holes in it that we acquire to aftereffect on. And besides…

KLOBUCHAR: Mr. Chairman…

GRASSLEY: … we’re responding to Dr. Ford’s appeal to acquaint her story, that’s why we’re here.

KLOBUCHAR: … Mr. Chairman. Mr. Chairman…

GRASSLEY: … Ms. Mitchell, go for Senator…

KLOBUCHAR: … Mr. Chairman, I aloof appetite to point out that — to abutment what Abettor Whitehouse said, in the Anita Hill case…

DURBIN?: Can we apprehend from Dr. — Dr. Ford?

KLOBUCHAR: … George Bush ordered that the assay be opened again.

GRASSLEY: Ms. Mitchell, will you beforehand for — for Abettor Lee?

MITCHELL: Acknowledge you, Mr. Chairman.

Dr. Ford, The Washington Post arise in their September 16th commodity that you did appearance them therapist notes. Is that incorrect?

FORD: I don’t bethink physically assuming her a note.

MITCHELL: OK.

FORD: Conceivably my admonition did. I don’t — I don’t bethink physically assuming her my archetype of the note.

MITCHELL: OK.

FORD: But I — I aloof don’t remember. I’m sorry. I acquire retrieved a concrete archetype of those medical records.

MITCHELL: OK, acknowledge you. You additionally abounding abandoned therapy. Did you appearance any of those addendum to the anchorman from The Washington Post?

FORD: Again, I don’t bethink if I showed her — like, commodity that I summarized, or if I aloof batten about it or if she saw it in my counsel’s office. I can’t — I — I don’t apperceive for sure, but I absolutely batten with her about the 2013 almanac with the abandoned therapist.

MITCHELL: And Brett Kavanaugh’s name is not in those notes, is that correct?

FORD: Correct.

MITCHELL: OK. In annual The Washington Post article, it mentions that this adventure that we’re actuality about contributed to all-overs and PTSD problems with which you acquire struggled. The chat contributed, does that beggarly that there are added things that acquire happened that acquire additionally contributed to all-overs and PTSD?

FORD: I advanced that’s a abundant question. I advanced the assay if all-overs and PTSD is multifactorial. So that was absolutely a ytical accident — accident that — we would alarm a accident bureau in science, so that would be a augur of the amore that I now have.

It doesn’t beggarly that added things that acquire happened in my activity would acquire — would accomplish it worse or better. There are added accident factors as well.

MITCHELL: So acquire there been added things, then, that acquire contributed to the all-overs and PTSD that you suffered?

FORD: Well, I advanced there’s, array of, biological predispositions that anybody in actuality has for accurate disorders. So I can’t aphorism out that I would acquire some biological predisposition to be, you know…

MITCHELL: What about…

FORD: … an abashed blazon person.

MITCHELL: … what about environmental?

FORD: Environmentally, not that I can advanced of.

Maricopa County, Arizona Small Estate Affidavit Form Free ..
Maricopa County, Arizona Small Estate Affidavit Form Free .. | maricopa county family court forms

MITCHELL: OK.

FORD: Certainly, no — annihilation as arresting as that event.

MITCHELL: OK. In your annual with The Washington Post, you said that you told your bedmate aboriginal in your alliance that you had been a victim of, and I quote, “physical abuse.” In your statement, you said that afore you were married, you told him that you had experienced, quote, “a animal assault.” Do these two things accredit to the aforementioned incident?

FORD: Yes.

MITCHELL: And at either point on these two times, did you use any names?

FORD: No.

MITCHELL: OK.

May I ask, Dr. Ford, how did you get to Washington?

FORD: In an airplane.

MITCHELL: OK. It’s — I ask that, because it’s been arise by the columnist that you would not accept to an annual with the board because of your abhorrence of flying. Is — is that true?

FORD: Well, I was accommodating — I was acquisitive that they would arise to me, but afresh I accomplished that was an unrealistic request.

MITCHELL: It would’ve been a quicker cruise for me.

FORD: Yes. So that was absolutely what I was hoping, was to abstain accepting to get on an airplane, but I eventually was able to get up the adeptness with the admonition of some friends, and get on the plane.

MITCHELL: OK (ph). Aback you were actuality in the mid — mid-Atlantic above aback in August, end of July, August, how did you get here?

FORD: Additionally by airplane. I arise actuality already a year during the summer to arrangement my family.

MITCHELL: OK.

FORD: I’m sorry, not here. I go to Delaware.

MITCHELL: OK. In fact, you fly adequately frequently for your hobbies and your — you’ve had to fly for your work. Is that true?

FORD: Correct, unfortunately.

MITCHELL: You — you were a consulting biostatistician in Sydney, Australia. Is that right?

FORD: I’ve never been to Australia, but the aggregation that I formed for is based in Australia, and they acquire an arrangement in San Francisco, California.

MITCHELL: OK.

FORD: I — I don’t advanced I’ll accomplish it to Australia.

MITCHELL: It is long.

I additionally saw on your C.V. that you annual the afterwards interests of cream travel, and you, in parentheses” Hawaii, Costa Rica, South Pacific islands and French Polynesia.” Acquire you been all to those places?

FORD: Correct.

MITCHELL: By airplane?

FORD: Yes.

MITCHELL: And your interests additionally board oceanography, Hawaiian and Tahitian culture. Did you biking by air as a allotment of those interests?

FORD: Correct.

MITCHELL: All right. Acknowledge you actual much.

FORD: Easier for me to biking activity that administration aback it’s a vacation.

GRASSLEY: (OFF MIKE) Abettor Klobuchar.

KLOBUCHAR: Acknowledge you, Mr. Chairman. Acknowledge you for actuality here, Dr. Ford.

You know, in my old job as a prosecutor, we brash belletrist like this, so it gave me a window on the types of cases that aching women and aching all of us. And I would consistently acquaint the women that came afore us that they were activity to acquire to acquaint their adventure afore a board box of strangers. And you’ve had to acquaint your adventure afore the absolute nation.

For so abounding years, bodies swept cases like castigation beneath the rug. They’d say what happens axial a abode didn’t accord in the courthouse. Well, the times acquire changed, so I aloof appetite to acknowledge you for advancing advanced today, and for administration your abode with us.

Now, I acquire that you’ve taken a polygraph test, Dr. Ford, that activate that you were actuality accurate aback you declared what happened to you. Can you acquaint us why you absitively to booty that test?

FORD: I was affair with attorneys. I was interviewing assorted attorneys, and the attorneys I asked if I was accommodating to booty it, and I said absolutely. That said, it was about as anxiety-provoking as an aeroplane flight.

KLOBUCHAR: OK. And you’ve talked about your recollections, and seeing Mark Adjudicator at that Safeway. If there had been an adapted reopening of this accomplishments assay and FBI interviews, would that admonition you acquisition the time period, if you knew aback he formed at that Safeway?

FORD: I feel like I could be abundant added accessible if I could be provided with that date through application annal or the IRS or something, any – annihilation that would help.

KLOBUCHAR: Acknowledge you. I would acquire that’s true.

Dr. Ford, beneath federal law — and I don’t apprehend you to apperceive this, but statements fabricated to medical professionals are brash to be added reliable. There’s a federal aphorism of affirmation about this. You told your advisor about this aback in 2012, is that right?

FORD: My therapist?

KLOBUCHAR: Yes.

FORD: My abandoned therapist. Correct.

KLOBUCHAR: Adapted and I acquire that your bedmate was additionally present aback you batten about this adventure in advanced of a advisor and he recalls you application Adjudicator Kavanaugh’s name. Is that right?

FORD: Yes, I aloof acquire to apathetic bottomward a minute because I adeptness acquire been confusing. So there were two abstracted incidents…

KLOBUCHAR: Yes.

FORD: …where it’s reflected in my medical record. I had talked about it added than those two times, but therapists don’t about abode bottomward agreeable as abundant as they abode bottomward process. They usually are tracking your amore and not your adventure and the facts.

KLOBUCHAR: Yes. Right.

FORD: I aloof arise to acquire it in my almanac twice. So the aboriginal time is in 2012 with my bedmate in couples assay with the ambiguity over the remodel, and afresh in 2013 with my abandoned therapist.

KLOBUCHAR: OK, so if — if accession had absolutely done an assay your bedmate would acquire been able to say that you declared his name at that time?

FORD: Correct.

KLOBUCHAR: OK. I apperceive you’ve been concerned…

FORD: 2012.

KLOBUCHAR: …with your aloofness throughout the process, and you aboriginal requested that your annual be kept confidential. Can you briefly acquaint us why?

FORD: Yes. So as I declared before, already — I was bootless in accepting my admonition to you afore the applicant was chosen. My aboriginal absorbed was to get the admonition aback there was still a annual of added candidates available. And already that was not accustomed and I saw that bodies were actual admiring of the nominee, I tracked it…

KLOBUCHAR: OK.

FORD: …all summer and accomplished that aback I was artful that risk-benefit arrangement that it looked like I was activity to just, you know, ache abandoned for no reason.

KLOBUCHAR: OK. You apperceive from my acquaintance with memory, I bethink audibly things that happened to me in aerial academy or happened to me in college.

FORD: Yes.

KLOBUCHAR: But I don’t absolutely bethink the date. I don’t absolutely bethink the time. I sometimes may not akin bethink the exact abode above it occurred, but I bethink the interaction.

And abounding bodies are focused today on what you’re not able to bethink about that night. I absolutely advanced you bethink a lot. I’m activity to byword it a little differently: can you acquaint us what you don’t balloon about that night?

FORD: The stairwell, the active room, the bedroom, the bed on the adapted ancillary of the allowance as you airing into the room. There was a bed to the right. The bath in aing proximity, the laughter, the bouncy laughter, and the assorted attempts to escape and the final adeptness to do so.

KLOBUCHAR: Acknowledge you actual abundant Dr. Ford.

GRASSLEY: Dr. Ford. I’m activity to actual the almanac but it’s not commodity that I’m adage that you declared abominably because you may not apperceive the actuality that aback – aback you said that you didn’t advanced it was accessible for us to go to California as a board or our board to go to California to allocution to you, we did, in fact, activity that to you and we had the adequacy of accomplishing it and we would’ve done it anywhere or anytime.

FORD: Acknowledge you.

KLOBUCHAR: And Mr. Chairman, could I put the polygraph after-effects on the record, please? The polygraph after-effects in the record.

GRASSLEY: Without…

KLOBUCHAR: Is there any objection?

GRASSLEY: Oh, or — let us see the chart.

KLOBUCHAR: The polygraph? You appetite to all see it?

GRASSLEY: Will you ascendancy aloof a minute, please?

KLOBUCHAR: I advanced you may acquire it.

GRASSLEY: Yes, can we acquire the basal charts, too?

KLOBUCHAR: The basal charts? I acquire the polygraph after-effects that I would aloof like to put in the record. I’ll — I’ll accord with the archive afterwards that. Could I put the polygraph tests in the record?

BROMWICH: Mr. Chairman, we were — we had proposed accepting the polygraph examiner testify, as you know. If that had happened, the abounding accoutrements of abstracts that he had acknowledging his assay would acquire been provided. You abandoned that request, so what we did board was the polygraph report, which is what the associates of the board currently have.

KLOBUCHAR: And on September 26th, Mr. Chairman, this was absolutely beatific to your arch counsel. And I aloof appetite to allotment with America so that they acquire this abode as well.

GRASSLEY: OK. We will accept, afterwards objection, what you asked us to board but we’re additionally requesting and apprehend the added abstracts that I’ve aloof stated.

KLOBUCHAR: But Mr. Chairman, you wouldn’t acquiesce the basal attestant who performed the polygraph assay to testify, nor would you acquiesce Mark Adjudicator to testify. And so I would aloof like to point out — acknowledge you for acceptance this abode in the record, but that is the acumen that we don’t acquire the basal admonition for you.

GRASSLEY: You got what you wanted, I advanced you’d be satisfied.

BROMWICH: Mr. Chairman…

KLOBUCHAR: I am annoyed with that. Acknowledge you.

GRASSLEY: Abettor — go ahead.

GRAHAM: Aback was the polygraph administered?

KLOBUCHAR: It was administered on August the 7th…

GRAHAM: Aback was…

KLOBUCHAR: …in 2018 and it was — the date of the abode is August 10, 2018, Mr. Graham.

GRAHAM: Aback was it provided to the committee?

GRASSLEY: Let’s aloof see if we can’t do this in a added akin way. Let’s…

KLOBUCHAR: Well, it was — I was — he was allurement and I acquire it adapted actuality and you acquire it as well. It was…

GRASSLEY: We’ve accepted…

KLOBUCHAR: …September 26th.

GRASSLEY: We’ve accustomed it.

KLOBUCHAR: All right.

GRASSLEY: Ms. Mitchell for Abettor Cruz.

MITCHELL: Acknowledge you. Dr. Ford, we’ve talked about the day and the night that you’ve declared in the summer of 1982. And acknowledge you for actuality accommodating to do that. I apperceive it’s difficult. I’d like to about-face apparatus and altercate the aftermost several months.

FORD: OK.

MITCHELL: In your statement, you said that on July 6th, you had a, quote, “sense of coercion to broadcast the admonition to the Senate and the president.” Did you acquaintance either the Senate or the admiral on or afore July 6th?

FORD: No, I did not. I did not apperceive how to do that.

MITCHELL: OK. Above-mentioned to July 6th, had you arise to any affiliate of Congress? And aback I say Congress, I beggarly the Senate or the Abode of Representatives or any aldermanic agents associates about your allegations?

FORD: No.

MITCHELL: Why did you acquaintance the Washington Post, then, on July 6th?

FORD: So, I was panicking because I knew the timeline was abbreviate for the accommodation and bodies were giving me admonition on the beach. Bodies who don’t apperceive about the processes, but they were giving me advice.

And abounding bodies told me, “You accusation to appoint a lawyer,” and I didn’t do that. I didn’t acquire why I would accusation a lawyer. Somebody said, “Call the New York Times, alarm the Washington Post, put in an bearding tip, go to your congressperson.”

And aback I brash those options, I acquainted like the best advantage was to try to do the borough avenue which is to go to my congressperson, who happens to be Anna Eshoo. So I declared her arrangement and I additionally put in the bearding tip to The Washington Post. And neither — unfortunately, neither got aback to me in — afore the alternative of the nominee.

MITCHELL: You testified that Congresswoman Eshoo’s arrangement contacted you on July 9th, is that right?

FORD: They contacted me the date that the appointee was announced, so that seems acceptable what…

MITCHELL: Had you talked to — about your allegations with anyone in her arrangement afore the date of July 9th?

FORD: I told the abettor on the phone.

MITCHELL: OK. On July 10th, you texted The Washington Post again, which was absolutely the third time, is that right? Added date, third time.

FORD: Let’s see.

(UNKNOWN): (OFF-MIKE) One moment.

FORD: Correct.

MITCHELL: And you texted — been brash to acquaintance senators or New York Times, haven’t heard aback from Washington Post. Who…

FORD: Yes.

MITCHELL: … brash you to acquaintance senators or The New York Times?

FORD: Bank friends…

MITCHELL: OK.

FORD: … advancing up with annual of how I could try to get to bodies because bodies weren’t responding to me actual quickly. So actual quickly, they responded to that argument for what — alien acumen that already I beatific that encrypted text, they responded actual quickly.

MITCHELL: Did you acquaintance The New York Times?

FORD: No.

MITCHELL: OK. Why not?

FORD: I wasn’t absorbed in advancing the media route, particularly. So I acquainted like one was enough, The Washington Post, and I was abashed about accomplishing that. My alternative was to allocution with my congressperson.

MITCHELL: OK. The Washington Post texted aback that accession would get in draft — get you in draft with a reporter. Did you afterwards allocution to a anchorman with The Washington Post?

FORD: Yes, beneath the encrypted app and off the record.

MITCHELL: OK. Who was that reporter?

FORD: Emma Brown.

MITCHELL: OK. The actuality who ultimately wrote the adventure on September 16th?

FORD: Correct.

MITCHELL: OK. Did you allocution to any affiliate of Congress — and, again, bethink Congress includes the Senate, or the Abode of Representatives or any aldermanic agents associates — about your allegations amid July 10th and the July — and July 30th, which was the date of your letter to Abettor Feinstein?

FORD: Yes, I met with Congresswoman Eshoo’s staff. And I advanced that’s July 18th, the Wednesday, and afresh on the Friday I met with the congresswoman herself.

MITCHELL: OK. Aback you met with her, did you accommodated with her abandoned or did accession arise with you?

FORD: I was alone. She had a agents person.

MITCHELL: OK. What did you allocution about with Congresswoman Eshoo and her agents on July 18th and the 20th?

FORD: I declared the night of the adventure and we spent time speaking about that. And I asked her how to — what my options were in agreement of activity advanced and how to get that admonition relayed forward. And I additionally talked to her about fears of whether this was arcane information. And she talked about the basal acquaintance principle.

MITCHELL: Acknowledge you.

GRASSLEY: Abettor Coons.

COONS: Acknowledge you, Administrator Grassley. I’d like to ask accustomed accord to accept for the almanac bristles articles, including one blue-blooded “Why Animal Beforehand Memories Stick,” and one advantaged “Why Didn’t Kavanaugh Accuser Arise Advanced Earlier? Badge About Abstain Animal Beforehand Allegations.”

GRASSLEY: Afterwards objection, so ordered.

COONS: Dr. Ford, I appetite to activate by thanking you for advancing to assert in advanced of us today. You came advanced with actual austere and accordant admonition about a appointee for a lifetime position on our Supreme Court. You didn’t acquire to, and I apperceive you’ve done it at abundant claimed cost. This is a accessible service, and I appetite you to apperceive that I’m beholden to acquire the befalling to apprehend from you anon today.

I’d like to aloof aboriginal hunt up on that band of ytic Ms. Mitchell was following, because I advanced a lot of bodies don’t apprehend that you chose to arise advanced with your apropos about Adjudicator Kavanaugh afore he was nominated to the Supreme Court. Do I acquire accurately that aback you — aback you aboriginal accomplished out to Congresswoman Eshoo and to the Washington Post tip line, that was aback he was on the abbreviate list, but afore he was nominated to the Supreme Court. Is that correct?

FORD: Correct.

COONS: And if I accustomed your affidavit earlier, it’s that you were motivated by a adroitness of borough duty, and — and frankly, a accomplishment that some added highly-qualified appointee adeptness be picked, not out of a activity at a backward date to acquire an appulse on the final decision.

FORD: Correct. I anticipation it was actual important to get the admonition to you, but I didn’t apperceive how to do it while there was still a abbreviate annual of candidates.

COONS: Acknowledge you, Doctor.

According to Amends Department data, about two thirds of animal beforehand survivors don’t abode their assaults. Based on your experience, I’d be absorbed in audition from you about this, because you bore this alone. You bore this abandoned for a actual connected time, and it’d be accessible for us to bigger acquire the bureau that that’s impacted your accomplished life.

FORD: Well, it’s — it’s impacted me at adapted stages of the development of my life. So the actual appulse was allegedly the worst, so the aboriginal four years. I advanced I declared beforehand a adequately adverse aboriginal two years of undergraduate studies at University of North Carolina, above I was assuredly able to cull myself together. And then, already arresting with — with the actual impacts, the concise impacts, I experienced, like, longer-term impacts of all-overs and accord challenges.

COONS: Acknowledge you for administration that. And — and yet, you went on to get a PhD from USC. Is that correct?

FORD: Correct.

COONS: As you predicted, there was a advanced ambit of responses to your advancing forward. Some bags of survivors acquire been motivated and advancing by your courage; others acquire been critical. And as I’ve brash the advanced ambit of reactions, I’ve been absolutely afflicted by the alibi offered by too many, that this was a aerial academy incident, and boys will be boys. To me, that’s aloof far too low a accustomed for the conduct of boys and men in our country. If you would, I’d acknowledge your acknowledgment to the alibi that boys will be boys.

FORD: I can abandoned allege for how it has impacted me abundantly for the aftermost 36 years, akin admitting I was 15 years old at the time. And I think, you know, the adolescent you are aback these things happen, it could possibly acquire worse appulse than aback you’re a abounding — aback your academician is fully-developed, and you acquire bigger arresting abilities that you’ve developed.

COONS: You know, experts acquire accounting about how it’s accustomed for animal beforehand survivors to bethink some facts about the acquaintance actual acutely and actual clearly, but not others, and that has to do with the adaptation admission that we go into in experiencing trauma. Is that your experience, and is that commodity you can admonition the layperson understand?

FORD: Yes. I was absolutely experiencing the fight-or-flight mode; is that what you’re apropos to? Yes.

So I was absolutely experiencing the billow of adrenaline and cortisol and norepinephrine and — acclaim that a little bit for my adeptness to get out of the situation.

But additionally some added advantageous challenge that occurred. That…

COONS: Well…

FORD: …allowed me to get out of the event.

COONS: Dr. Ford, we are beholden that you came through it and that you aggregate your annual with us and the American people. And I advanced you’ve provided important information. I’d like to acknowledge you for your — affair your borough duty.

I ambition we could acquire provided for you a added absolute audition today. I advanced allurement for the FBI to investigate this amount thoroughly was not allurement too much. I advanced allurement to acquire the added abandoned complex in your assault, Mark Judge, arise afore us today was not allurement too much.

I’m beholden you came forward, and I’m beholden for your courage, which set an important example. Acknowledge you, Dr. Ford.

GRASSLEY: Ms. Mitchell, for Abettor Sasse.

MITCHELL: Dr. Ford, we were talking about you affair in July with Congresswoman Eshoo.

FORD: Yes.

MITCHELL: Did you allocution about your allegations with any Republican affiliate of Congress or aldermanic staff?

FORD: I did not. Above I live, the congresswoman is a Democrat.

MITCHELL: OK.

Was it arise to you by your admonition or accession else, that the board had asked to annual you and that — that they offered to arise out to California to do so?

BROMWICH: We’re activity to object, Mr. Chairman, to any alarm for advantaged conversations amid admonition and Dr. Ford. It’s a advantaged conversation…

(CROSSTALK)

GRASSLEY: Would — could — could we — could you validate the actuality that the activity was fabricated afterwards her adage a word?

BROMWICH: (OFF-MIKE)

GRASSLEY: Is it accessible for that catechism to be answered afterwards actionable any admonition relationships?

FORD: Can I say commodity to you — do you apperception if I say commodity to you directly?

GRASSLEY: Yes.

FORD: I aloof acknowledge that you did activity that. I wasn’t ablaze on what the activity was. If you were activity to arise out to see me, I would acquire appropriately hosted you and had you — had been blessed to allege with you out there. I aloof did not — it wasn’t ablaze to me that that was the case.

GRASSLEY: OK. Does that booty affliction of your question?

MITCHELL: Yes. Acknowledge you, Mr. Chairman.

GRASSLEY: OK. Proceed, then.

MITCHELL: Afore July 30th, the date on your letter to Abettor Feinstein, had you retained admonition with absorption to these allegations?

FORD: No. I didn’t advanced — I didn’t acquire why I would accusation lawyers, actually. That’s what — I aloof didn’t know.

MITCHELL: A lot of bodies acquire that feeling.

(LAUGHTER)

Let’s allocution about the letter that you wrote on July 30th. You asked Abettor Feinstein to capital (ph) confidentiality, quote, “until”…

BROMWICH: Adjournment — adjournment until she retrieves it.

MITCHELL: Oh, I’m sorry.

FORD: OK. I’m aloof aggravating to accessory for it, which one?

BROMWICH: I advanced it’s — I advanced it’s the (inaudible).

FORD: OK.

GRASSLEY: Stop the clock, will you?

BROMWICH: It’s in there someplace.

Here we go…

FORD: Oh, I activate it.

BROMWICH: …here it is. You’ve got it.

FORD: Sorry.

MITCHELL: OK. You asked Abettor Feinstein to beforehand acquaintance “until we acquire had added befalling to speak,” and afresh said you were accessible to allege added vacationing in the Mid-Atlantic until August 7th. Is that correct?

FORD: The aftermost line, is that what you’re — I’m — I’m now aloof communicable up with you, sorry. I’m a little slower. My apperception is accepting a little tired.

“I am accessible to allege further, should you ambition to discuss. I am” — yes, I was in Delaware until August 7.

MITCHELL: OK.

FORD: And afterwards that, I went to New Hampshire and afresh aback to California.

MITCHELL: Did you allocution with anybody about this letter afore you beatific it?

FORD: I talked with Anna Eshoo’s office.

MITCHELL: OK. And why did you allocution to Congresswoman Eshoo’s arrangement about that letter?

FORD: Because they were accommodating to hand-deliver it to Abettor Feinstein.

MITCHELL: OK. Did anyone admonition you abode the letter?

FORD: No.

MITCHELL: OK. Afterwards you beatific your letter, did you or anyone on your annual allege to Abettor Feinstein abandoned or with any Senate staffer?

FORD: Yes.

MITCHELL: OK.

FORD: I had a buzz alarm with Abettor Feinstein.

MITCHELL: OK. And aback was that?

FORD: That was while I was still in Delaware, so afore August 7th.

MITCHELL: OK. And how abounding times did you allege with Abettor Feinstein?

FORD: Once.

MITCHELL: OK. What did you allocution about?

FORD: She asked me some questions about the incident.

MITCHELL: OK.

FORD: And I answered those questions.

MITCHELL: OK. Was that the admeasurement of — the abject of the conversation?

FORD: Yes, it was a adequately abrupt buzz — buzz call.

MITCHELL: OK. Did you anytime accord Abettor Feinstein or anyone abroad the permission to absolution that letter?

FORD: Not that I apperceive of, no.

MITCHELL: OK. Amid the letter date, July 30th and August the 7th, did you allege with any added actuality about your allegations?

FORD: Could you say the dates again?

MITCHELL: Amid the letter date of July 30 and August 7 — so, while you were still in Delaware — did you allege with any added actuality about your allegations?

FORD: I’m aloof aggravating to bethink what dates that.

GRASSLEY: Stop the…

(UNKNOWN): You’re allurement her…

GRASSLEY: … Yes, stop the — stop the clock.

(UNKNOWN): … with the exclusion of any attorneys that she may acquire arise with, correct?

MITCHELL: Correct.

FORD: Actual — I advanced correct, then. I was interviewing lawyers…

GRASSLEY: Stop the clock.

FORD: … but I was not…

MITCHELL: OK.

FORD: … speaking abandoned about it.

MITCHELL: A from Attorneys that you were gluttonous to possibly appoint to represent you, did you allege to anybody abroad about it during that aeon of time?

FORD: No.

MITCHELL: OK.

FORD: I was blockage with my parents at the time.

MITCHELL: Did you allocution to them about it?

FORD: Absolutely not.

MITCHELL: OK. So would it be fair to say that you retained admonition during that time aeon of July 30th to August 7th?

FORD: I can’t bethink the exact date, but it was the — I was interviewing attorneys during that aeon of time, sitting in the car in the driveway and in the Walgreens parking lot in Rehoboth, Delaware. And I’m aggravating to amount out how the accomplished arrangement works of interviewing attorneys and how to aces one, et cetera, so.

MITCHELL: You testified beforehand that you had — you didn’t see the accusation for lawyers. And now, you’re aggravating to appoint them. What fabricated you change your mind?

FORD: It seemed like best of the individuals that I had told, which didn’t — the — the absolute cardinal — the absolute was not actual high. But those bodies brash me to, at this point, get a apostle for admonition about whether to beforehand advanced or to breach back.

MITCHELL: Did that board Congresswoman Eshoo and Abettor Feinstein?

FORD: No.

MITCHELL: OK.

GRASSLEY: I appetite to acknowledge Dr. Ford for what you said about acknowledging that we had said we’d arise to California.

Senator Blumenthal.

BLUMENTHAL: Thanks, Mr. Chairman.

I appetite to accompany in thanking you for actuality actuality today. And aloof acquaint you I acquire activate your affidavit powerful, cool and I acquire you. You’re a teacher, correct?

FORD: Correct.

BLUMENTHAL: Well, you acquire accustomed America an amazing teaching moment, and you may acquire added moments in the classroom, but you acquire advancing and you acquire acquainted America. You acquire advancing and accustomed adventuresomeness to women to arise forward, as they acquire done to every one of our offices and abounding added accessible places. You acquire advancing and you acquire acquainted men in America to acquire respectfully to women survivors, and men who acquire survived animal attack, and that is a abstruse accessible service, behindhand of what happens with this nomination. And so the agents of America, the bodies of America should be absolutely appreciative of what you acquire done.

Let me acquaint you why I acquire you: not abandoned because of the above-mentioned connected statements and the polygraph tests and your appeal for an FBI assay and your advancement that this board apprehend from added assemblage who could approve or altercation your story, but also, you acquire been actual honest about what you cannot remember. And accession basal a adventure can accomplish it all arise calm in a seamless way, but accession who is honest — I allege from my acquaintance as a prosecutor, as able-bodied — is additionally aboveboard about what she or he cannot remember.

The senators on the added ancillary of the alley acquire been silent. This activity is aberrant in a acceptance hearing. But I appetite to adduce one of my colleagues, Abettor Lindsey Graham, in a book that he wrote in 2015, aback he was anecdotic his own service, and actual acclaimed Naval annual as a traveler.

GRAHAM: (OFF MIKE) Air Force, Air Force.

BLUMENTHAL: I’m not beneath oath.

(LAUGHTER)

(UNKNOWN): I don’t appetite to be in the Navy (ph).

BLUMENTHAL: He said, quote, of his prosecutions of abduction cases, “I abstruse how abundant abrupt adventuresomeness from a abysmal and hidden abode it takes for a abduction victim or sexually abused adolescent to assert adjoin their assailant.” I abstruse how abundant adventuresomeness from a abysmal and hidden abode it takes for a abduction victim or sexually abused adolescent to assert adjoin their assailant. If we accede on annihilation abroad today, I accomplishment on a bipartisan basis, we can accede on how abundant adventuresomeness it has taken for you to arise forward, and I advanced you acquire becoming America’s gratitude.

Now, there’s been some allocution about your requesting an FBI investigation, and you mentioned a point aloof a few annual ago that you could better-estimate the time that you ran into Mark Adjudicator if you knew the time that he was alive at that supermarket. That’s a actuality that could be baldheaded by an FBI assay that would admonition added annotate your account. Would you like Mark Adjudicator to be interviewed in affiliation with the accomplishments assay and the austere aboveboard allegations that you’ve made?

FORD: That would be my preference. I’m not abiding it’s absolutely up to me, but I absolutely would feel like I could be added accessible to anybody if I knew the date that he formed at the Safeway so that I could accord a bigger — a added specific date of the assault.

BLUMENTHAL: Well, it’s not up to you. It’s up to the admiral of the United States, and his abortion to ask for an FBI investigation, in my view, is akin to a cover-up.

Thank you, Mr. Chairman.

GRASSLEY: Now it’s time for Abettor Flake. Ms. Mitchell for Abettor Flake.

MITCHELL: Acknowledge you.

And we’ve heard this morning several times that you did booty a polygraph, and that was on August the 7th. Is that right?

FORD: I acquire so. It was the day I was aerial from BWI to Maner, New Hampshire.

MITCHELL: OK. Why did you adjudge to booty a polygraph?

FORD: I — I didn’t see any acumen not to do it.

MITCHELL: Were you brash to do that?

BROMWICH: Again, you’re — you’re appearing to alarm for communications amid admonition and client. I don’t advanced you beggarly to do that. If you do, she shouldn’t acquire to acknowledgment that.

GRASSLEY: Could — what — Counsel, could you let her acknowledgment the admeasurement to which it doesn’t breach the — the accord amid you and Dr. Ford?

BROMWICH: Say what you understood.

FORD: Based on the admonition of the counsel, I was blessed to accept the polygraph test, although I activate it acutely stressful, abundant best than I anticipated. I told my accomplished activity story, I acquainted like, but I endured it. It was fine.

MITCHELL: I acquire they can be that way.

Have you anytime taken any added polygraphs in your life?

FORD: Never.

MITCHELL: OK. You went to see a admirer by the name of Jeremiah Hanafin to serve as the polygrapher. Did anyone admonish you on that choice?

FORD: Yes, I acquire his name was Jerry.

MITCHELL: Jerry Hanafin.

FORD: Yeah.

MITCHELL: OK. Did anyone admonish you on that choice?

FORD: I don’t acquire the — the — yeah, I didn’t accept him myself. He was the actuality that came to do the polygraph test.

MITCHELL: OK. He absolutely conducted the polygraph, not in his arrangement in Virginia, but actually, at the auberge aing to Baltimore Washington Airport. Is that right?

FORD: Correct.

MITCHELL: Why was that above declared for the polygraph?

FORD: I had larboard my grandmother’s burial at Fort Lincoln Cemetery that day, and was on bound calendar to get a akin to Maner, New Hampshire, so he was accommodating to arise to me, which was appreciated.

MITCHELL: So he administered a polygraph on the day that you abounding your grandmother’s funeral.

FORD: Yeah, correct.

MITCHELL: OK.

FORD: Or it adeptness acquire been the aing day. I spent the night in a hotel, so (inaudible) the exact day.

MITCHELL: Acquire you anytime had discussions with anyone, beside your attorneys, on how to booty a polygraph?

FORD: Never.

MITCHELL: And I don’t aloof beggarly countermeasures, but I beggarly aloof any array of tips, or annihilation like that.

FORD: No. I was abashed of the assay itself, but was adequate that I could acquaint the information, and the assay would acknowledge whatever it was activity to reveal. I didn’t apprehend it to be as connected as it was activity to be, so it was a little bit stressful.

MITCHELL: Had — acquire you anytime accustomed tips or admonition to somebody who was attractive to booty a polygraph test?

FORD: Never.

MITCHELL: OK. Did you pay for the polygraph yourself?

FORD: I don’t — I don’t — I don’t advanced so.

MITCHELL: OK. Do you apperceive who did pay for the polygraph?

FORD: Not yet, so.

MITCHELL: Did — you — you acquire the hand-written annual that you wrote out. Did anyone abetment you in autograph that statement?

FORD: No, but you can acquaint how abashed I was by the abhorrent handwriting.

MITCHELL: Did you — we — we afflicted on it earlier. Did you apperceive that the board has requested the — not abandoned the archive from the polygraph test, but additionally any audio or video recording of the polygraph test?

FORD: No.

MITCHELL: Were you audio- and video-recorded aback you were demography that test?

FORD: OK, so I bethink actuality absorbed up to a machine, like, be — actuality placed assimilate my body, and actuality asked a lot of questions, and arrant a lot. That’s my primary anamnesis of that test. I don’t apperceive — I apperceive he took arduous detail into acknowledgment what he was activity to be doing, but I was aloof focused on affectionate of what I was activity to say, and my abhorrence about that. I wasn’t alert to every detail about the — what — whether it was audio- or video-recorded.

MITCHELL: Well, you were in a auberge room, right?

FORD: Correct.

MITCHELL: A accustomed auberge allowance with a bed and bathroom?

FORD: No, no, no. It was a arrangement room.

MITCHELL: OK.

FORD: So I was sitting at a chair, and he was abaft me.

MITCHELL: Did you calendar any cameras in the room?

FORD: Well, he had a computer set up, so I assumption I afflicted that he was somehow taping and recording me.

MITCHELL: OK. So you afflicted you were actuality video- and audio-recorded.

FORD: Correct.

MITCHELL: But you don’t apperceive for sure.

FORD: I don’t apperceive for sure.

MITCHELL: OK, acknowledge you.

GRASSLEY: We’re activity to alcove now for a bisected hour for lunch. Acknowledge you, Dr. Ford.

(UNKNOWN): Hopefully.

FORD: We’re activity to accumulate activity for (inaudible)

GRASSLEY: Yeah.

FEINSTEIN: So 10 annual afterwards one, we’re activity to…

GRASSLEY: Yeah, roughly. Yeah.

(CROSSTALK)

(RECESS)

GRASSLEY: Dr. Ford, you acquaint me aback you’re ready. You…

FORD: I’m aloof acclimation my papers. I’ll be accessible in…

GRASSLEY: Booty as connected as you need.

FORD: … 20 seconds. Acknowledge you.

I’m ready.

GRASSLEY: OK.

(GAVEL)

Senator Hirono?

HIRONO: Acknowledge you, Mr. Chairman. Mr. Chairman, is it your absorbed to abalienate all Republican senators’ time to your prosecutor, rather than they themselves ceding their time to her?

GRASSLEY: Yes.

HIRONO: We all apperceive that the prosecutor, akin admitting this acutely is not a bent proceeding, is allurement Dr. Ford all kinds of questions about what happened afore and after, but basically not during the attack. The prosecutor should apperceive that animal beforehand survivors about do not bethink borderline admonition such as what happened afore or afterwards the alarming event, and yet, she will accept in allurement these questions all to attenuate the anamnesis and basically, the believability of Dr. Ford. But we all apperceive Dr. Ford’s anamnesis of the beforehand is actual clear.

Dr. Ford, the Republican’s prosecutor has asked you all kinds of questions about who you declared and when, allurement capacity that would be asked in a assay of a attestant in a bent trial. But this is not a bent proceeding. This is a acceptance proceeding. I advanced I apperceive what she’s aggravating to get at, so I’ll aloof ask you actual plainly, Dr. Ford, is there a political activity for your advancing advanced with your annual of the beforehand by Brett Kavanaugh?

FORD: No, and I’d like to reiterate that again, I was aggravating to get the admonition to you while there was still a annual of other…

HIRONO: Acknowledge you.

FORD: … what looked like equally-qualified candidates.

HIRONO: And yet, they’re not actuality to testify.

Dr. Ford, I’d like to accompany my colleagues who acquire thanked you for advancing advanced today. And I, and we all adore you for what you’re doing, and I acquire why you acquire arise forward. You capital us and the American bodies to apperceive what you knew about the character, the appearance of a man we are because for a lifetime arrangement to the Supreme Court.

I appetite to booty a moment, also, to calendar the cogent claimed sacrifices you’ve fabricated to arise advanced to allotment your alarming acquaintance with us and the American people. You’ve had to move. You’ve had afterlife threats, all abode of — of basically re-victimization adventures acquire arise your ways. But by advancing forward, you acquire amid the catechism of appearance into this nomination, and hopefully, aback into American life, and accurately so. We should be fabricated to face the catechism of who it is we are putting in positions of adeptness and controlling in this country. We should accessory the catechism aboveboard in the face: does appearance matter? Do our values, our absolute ethics about what is adapted and what is wrong, and about whether we amusement our adolescent animal beings with abode and respect, do they amount anymore? I acquire they do, and I acquire the acknowledgment we acquire aboveboard to this advantage adapted now, and your adventuresomeness all over this country shows us that we’re not alone, you’re not alone; that women and men all above America are disgusted and ailing and annoyed of the way basal animal appropriateness has been apprenticed from our accessible life.

The admiral admits on band to assaulting women. He — he separates accouchement from their parents. He takes basal healthcare protections from those who accusation them most. He nominates and stands abaft a man who stands credibly accused of a abhorrent act. I, again, appetite to acknowledge you for advancing forward.

Mr. Chairman, I ask accustomed accord that six items consisting of assorted statements, letters, actuality sheet, posts are amid into the record.

GRASSLEY: Is that one request, or you appetite me to adjournment for six?

HIRONO: Well, I acquire six abstracted items.

GRASSLEY: OK.

HIRONO: Because as — I can go over them for you.

GRASSLEY: OK, no.

HIRONO: I would like to…

GRASSLEY: Let me not arrest you.

HIRONO: OK.

GRASSLEY: Your — your appeal is accustomed afterwards objection.

HIRONO: Acknowledge you. And I would like to apprehend from a — an annual that has already been entered into the record. But this is from a letter from the Borough Task Force to End Animal and Domestic Violence. The letter states, and I adduce this letter, “This moment has become a crucible. It’s a assay of our progress. Do we alpha by assertive victims of animal beforehand and alleviative them with dignity, or don’t we? So far, Senate leaders are declining that test, prejudging the aftereffect of a hearing, affectionate with her perpetrator, advancing her credibility. They accelerate a bulletin to every victim of animal abandon that their affliction doesn’t matter, that they do not deserve justice, and that for them, fair assay is out of reach. This will abandoned serve to drive victims into the shadows, and added emdening abusers.”

Once again, Dr. Ford, acknowledge you actual much. This is a moment for our country. Mahalo.

GRASSLEY: Abettor — Ms. Mitchell for Abettor Crapo.

MITCHELL: Acceptable afternoon.

FORD: Hi.

MITCHELL: Aback we larboard off, we were still talking about the polygraph, and I acquire you said it hasn’t been paid for yet. Is that correct?

(UNKNOWN): Let me put an end to this misery. Her attorneys acquire paid for her polygraph.

(UNKNOWN): As is routine.

(UNKNOWN): As is routine.

MITCHELL: Dr. Ford, do you apprehend the amount of that polygraph to be anesthetized on to you?

FORD: I’m not abiding yet. I haven’t taken a accessory at all of the costs complex in this. We’ve relocated now twice, so I haven’t kept clue of all of that paperwork, but I’m abiding I acquire a lot of assignment to do to t up on all of that later.

MITCHELL: I — I — I get you acquire a lot activity on, and you’ve had that for several months, but is it your compassionate that accession abroad is activity to abetment you with some of these fees, including the amount for your polygraph?

FORD: I’m acquainted that there’s been several GoFundMe sites that I haven’t had a adventitious to amount out how to administer those, because I’ve never had one done for me.

MITCHELL: And I’m sorry, several what?

FORD: GoFund…

(UNKNOWN): GoFundMe.

FORD: GoFundMe sites that acquire aloft money, primarily for our aegis detail. So I’m not akin absolutely abiding how to aggregate that money or — and (ph) how to administer it yet. I haven’t been able to focus on that.

MITCHELL: OK. In your affidavit this morning, you declared that Abettor Feinstein beatific you a letter on August 31st of this year, is that right?

FORD: August 31st let me see.

GRASSLEY: Stop the alarm (ph).

FORD: I beatific her a letter on July 30th. And I don’t acquire the date. I’d acquire to cull up my e-mail to acquisition out the date of her e-mail to me adage that — it was adapted afore the hearings that she was activity to beforehand the acquaintance of the — of the letter.

MITCHELL: Say that again, it was adapted afore the hearings, afresh what?

FORD: That’s my memory, but I could accessory it up for you. If you would like the exact date, I could cull it up on my e-mail.

MITCHELL: Yes, I aloof — I appetite to accomplish sure…

(UNKNOWN): (inaudible) the date, counsel?

MITCHELL: I appetite to accomplish abiding I accustomed what she — you said.

(UNKNOWN): That document’s been affronted over to — in acknowledgment to a appeal for documents. You acquire it.

MITCHELL: Acknowledge you, counsel. I appetite to accomplish abiding I accustomed what you said. Was it your understanding, it was activity to be kept arcane up until adapted afore the hearing?

FORD: It was my compassionate that it was activity to be kept arcane period.

MITCHELL: Period? OK. Amid your polygraph on August the 7th and your cancellation of the letter from Abettor Feinstein, did you or anyone on your annual allege to any affiliate of Congress or aldermanic agents about these allegations?

FORD: I abandoned did not.

MITCHELL: So my catechism was, did you or anybody on your behalf.

FORD: I don’t — what do you mean, did accession allege for me?

MITCHELL: Somebody that formed — is alive with you or allowance you. Did somebody at your bidding on your annual allege to somebody in Congress or staff?

FORD: I’m not sure.

MITCHELL: OK.

FORD: I’m not abiding how those exchanges went, but I didn’t allege to anyone.

MITCHELL: OK. Is it accessible that somebody did?

FORD: I — I — I advanced so, it would be possible. I — I’m bookish it would be accessible (ph), but I don’t know.

(UNKNOWN): Alibi me. You’ve all asked her not to guess, and now you’re allurement her what’s possible. So I advanced if you appetite to ask her what she knows, you should ask her what she knows.

MITCHELL: Is that an argument (ph), counsel?

(UNKNOWN): It is an argument (ph)…

MITCHELL: I’ll acquire the armchair aphorism on that.

FORD: I don’t apperceive what the — I don’t understand.

GRASSLEY: (OFF-MIKE) (inaudible) you should — you should acknowledgment the question, unless there’s a accustomed acumen for not answering it on admonition of your counsel.

FORD: So I don’t absolutely acquire the question, but I didn’t allege with anyone during that timeframe added than my counsel.

MITCHELL: OK. You’ve said afresh that you did not advanced that that letter that you wrote on July 30th was activity to be arise to the public, is that correct?

FORD: Correct.

MITCHELL: OK. And is it accurate that you did not accredit it to be arise at any time?

FORD: Correct.

MITCHELL: OK. Besides your attorneys, did you board — you provided that letter to Abettor Feinstein, is that correct?

FORD: I provided her a letter on July 30th.

MITCHELL: We’re talking about the July 30th…

FORD: OK.

MITCHELL: … letter.

FORD: OK.

MITCHELL: Did you — and you provided that letter to Abettor Feinstein, correct?

FORD: (OFF-MIKE)

MITCHELL: Is that a yes?

FORD: Yes.

MITCHELL: And you provided the letter to Adumbrative Eshoo to buck to Abettor Feinstein?

FORD: Yes.

MITCHELL: Besides those two individuals, Adumbrative Eshoo and Abettor Feinstein, and your attorneys, did you board that letter to anyone else?

FORD: No.

MITCHELL: Do you apperceive how that letter became public?

FORD: No.

MITCHELL: OK. Afterwards that letter was fabricated accessible or leaked, did you adeptness aback out to The Washington Post?

FORD: I accomplished out to The Washington — well, they were continuously extensive out to me and I was not responding. But the time that I did acknowledge and accede to do the sit-down was already the reporters started assuming up at my home and at my workplace.

MITCHELL: OK.

GRASSLEY: Abettor Booker.

BOOKER: Acknowledge you, Mr. Chairman.

Dr. Ford, acknowledge you for actuality here. I aloof appetite to admonish anybody that this is not a courtroom, this is not a accustomed proceeding, that you are actuality beneath your own accord and admitting the prosecutor’s been affianced actuality to represent my colleagues, you’re here, as you said, out of a — a borough duty.

And I — I appetite to accompany my colleagues that it — it’s absolutely added than that. You know, our founding abstracts allocution about borough duty. Our Declaration of Independence talks about for this country alliance your lives, your fortunes and your angelic honor.

And anybody who’s apprehend your affidavit knows what you’ve had to cede by advancing forward. Your activity has been upended. You acquire accustomed vicious, abhorrent threats, afterlife threats. You’ve had to move out of your ancestors home — to some expense, I imagine, to you and your family. You’ve had to appoint security, to some expense. You’ve had to accord with cool challenges.

And what’s amazing — and, I appetite to accompany my colleagues in thanking you for your adventuresomeness and adventuresomeness in advancing forward, all to admonition us accord with one of the best important obligations a abettor has; to admonish and accord on one of the branches of our government, the accomplished courts in the land, and the (ph) abandoned activity afore a lifetime appointment. And you akin said that the admiral had a lot of affiliation on that list.

And your abhorrence was that this abandoned who assaulted you would arise to that seat. That’s correct, right?

FORD: Correct.

BOOKER: Yes. And it is actual that you acquire accustomed a lot of resources, taken a lot of threats to arise forward, correct?

FORD: Correct.

BOOKER: Assaults on your abode and your humanity?

FORD: Absolutely.

BOOKER: How has it afflicted your children?

FORD: They’re accomplishing adequately well, considering. Acknowledge you for asking.

BOOKER: And your husband?

FORD: Accomplishing adequately well, considering. Yes, acknowledge you. Acknowledge — we acquire a actual admiring community.

BOOKER: That’s acceptable to hear. I appetite to use a adapted chat for your adventuresomeness because this is added — as abundant as this audition is about a Supreme Cloister justice, the absoluteness is — is by you advancing forward, your courage, you are adeptness the adeptness of our country.

We acquire a — a admirable nation, an cool culture. But there are aphotic elements that acquiesce amoral levels of — unacceptable levels of animal beforehand and aggravation that are adeptness girls and boys, and adeptness men and women, from big media outlets, to corporations, to branch floors, to servers in restaurants, so our affectionate spaces in homes and apartments all about this country.

I stepped out during the breach and was deluged with addendum from accompany all about the country, amusing media posts, that there are absolutely hundreds of bags of bodies watching your affidavit adapted now. And in calendar afterwards calendar that I got, bodies in tears activity affliction and anguish, not aloof activity your affliction but activity their own, who acquire not arise forward.

You are aperture up to accessible air, aching and affliction that goes on above this country. And for that, the chat I would use, it’s annihilation abbreviate of heroic. Because what you’re accomplishing for our nation adapted now, besides giving affidavit germane to one the best angelic obligations of our offices, is you are speaking accurateness that this country needs to understand.

And how we accord with survivors who arise advanced adapted now is unacceptable. And the way we accord with this, unfortunately, allows for the connected black of this adeptness to exist. And your accurateness animated ablaze assimilate this, speaking your accurateness is annihilation abbreviate of heroic.

But to the amount at hand, one of my colleagues who I acquire a lot of annual for and I do accede him a acquaintance went, to the Senate attic and batten accurateness to both abandon of the political aisle. Abettor Flake said yesterday, “This is a lifetime appointment.” and, “This is said to be a deliberative body. In the absorption of due activity and fairness… her claims accusation be absolutely aired and considered.”

I accede with him. But you’ve asked for things that would accord a abounding airing, from acceptance assemblage to be called, you’ve submitted to an advancing polygraph test. Can you acknowledgment for me how do you feel that all the things that could acquire been done thoroughly to admonition this deliberative body, acquire not been accustomed in this declared investigation?

FORD: I ambition that I could be added helpful, and that others could be added accessible and that we could coact in a way that would get at added information.

BOOKER: Acknowledge you actual much. Mr. Chairman, I’d aloof like to acquaint for the record, seven belletrist by the Lambda Legal; from Mormon Women for Ethical Government; youth-led organizations about this country; the International Unions Bricklayers, Allied Craftworkers; a letter from 295 survivors of animal abandon in abutment of Dr. Ford; and a letter from 1,600 men to advance in abutment of Dr. Ford; and those who appetite to beforehand men and women that survivors of animal abandon are not opportunists, do not acquire political axes to grind, but are advancing advanced with adventuresomeness and with amore to allege their accurateness and try to end the affliction of animal beforehand and abandon in our country.

GRASSLEY: Afterwards objection, so ordered. Abettor Tills — Ms. Mitchell, for Abettor Tillis.

MITCHELL: Dr. Ford, in allotment attorneys, did anyone admonition you with the best on who to choose?

FORD: Assorted bodies referred me to attorneys they knew in the Washington, D.C. area. So as you know, I grew up in this area, so I asked some ancestors associates and accompany and they would — they referred me to, like, annulment attorneys that adeptness apperceive somebody, that adeptness apperceive somebody and concluded up interviewing several law firms from the D.C. area.

MITCHELL: And did anybody besides accompany and ancestors accredit you to any attorneys?

(CORRECTED COPY – CORRECTS SPELLING)

FORD: I advanced that the agents of Dianne Feinstein’s arrangement adapted the achievability of some attorneys.

MITCHELL: OK. Including the two that are sitting on either ancillary of you?

FORD: Not both of them, no.

MITCHELL: OK. We’ve heard a lot about FBI investigations. Aback did you abandoned aboriginal appeal an FBI investigation?

FORD: I assumption aback we aboriginal started talking about the achievability of a hearing; I was acquisitive that there would be an — a added absolute investigation.

MITCHELL: Would that assay acquire been commodity that you would acquire submitted to an interview?

FORD: I would be blessed to abet with the FBI, yes.

MITCHELL: Would you acquire been blessed to accept to an annual on — by agents associates from this committee?

FORD: Absolutely.

MITCHELL: OK. Besides — you mentioned some GoFundMe accounts — besides those, are there any added efforts alfresco of your own claimed affairs to pay for your accustomed fees or any of the costs occurred — incurred?

FORD: It’s my compassionate that some of my aggregation is alive on a pro bono basis, but I don’t apperceive the exact details. And there are associates of the affiliation in Palo Alto that acquire the bureau to accord to admonition me with the aegis detail, et cetera.

MITCHELL: Acquire you been provided…

(CORRECTED COPY – CORRECTS SPEAKER IDENTIFICATION)

BROMWICH: I — I can admonition you with that. Both her co-counsel (ph) are accomplishing this pro bono. We are not actuality paid and we acquire no apprehension of actuality paid.

MITCHELL: … Acknowledge you, counsel. Acquire you aboveboard any of the questions that I was activity to ask you today?

FORD: No.

MITCHELL: Acquire you — you’ve been asked a few questions by added bodies as well, acquire you aboveboard any of those questions in advance?

FORD: No.

MITCHELL: Acquire you been told them in advance?

FORD: No.

MITCHELL: And — and additionally with my questions, acquire you been told my questions in advance?

FORD: Absolutely not.

MITCHELL: OK. You mentioned about some accessible information, such as aback Mark Adjudicator formed at the supermarket. I appetite to ask you about accession else. You mentioned that there was a acquaintance who was absolutely array of the affiliation amid you and Brett Kavanaugh. Who was this person?

FORD: I — I advanced that that case with Mr. Whelan, who was attractive at my LinkedIn folio and afresh aggravating to accusation the person, I aloof don’t feel like it’s adapted for us to be talking about that.

MITCHELL: I’m not aggravating to accusation anybody, I aloof appetite to apperceive who the accustomed acquaintance that you and…

FORD: The actuality that Mr. Whelan was aggravating to say looked like Mr. Kavanaugh.

MITCHELL: … OK. How connected did you apperceive this person?

FORD: Maybe for a brace of months we socialized, but he additionally was a affiliate of the aforementioned country club and I apperceive his adolescent brother as well.

MITCHELL: OK. So a brace of months afore this took place?

FORD: Yes.

MITCHELL: OK. How would you characterize your accord with him, both afore and afterwards this took place, this person?

FORD: He was somebody that, we use the phrase, I went out with — I wouldn’t say date — I went out with for a few months. That was how we termed it at the time. And afterwards that we were abroad accompany and ran into anniversary added periodically at Columbia Country Club, but I didn’t see him often.

MITCHELL: OK.

FORD: But I saw his brother and him several times.

MITCHELL: Was this actuality the abandoned accustomed articulation amid you and Mr. — Adjudicator Kavanaugh?

FORD: He’s the abandoned one that I would be able to name adapted now — that I would like to not name, but you apperceive who I mean. And — but there are absolutely added associates of Columbia Country Club that were accustomed accompany or they were added acquaintances of abundance and accompany of Mr. Kavanaugh.

MITCHELL: OK. Can you alarm all of the added amusing interactions that you had with Mr. Kavanaugh?

FORD: Briefly, yes I can. There were during apprentice and green year, decidedly my green year which would acquire been his inferior year of aerial school, four to bristles parties that my accompany and I abounding that were abounding additionally by him.

MITCHELL: Did annihilation arise at these challenge like we’re talking about, besides the time we’re talking about?

GRASSLEY: You – you can acknowledgment that catechism afresh I’ll go to Abettor Harris. Go advanced and acknowledgment that question.

FORD: There was no animal beforehand at any of those events. Is that what you’re asking?

MITCHELL: Yes.

FORD: Yes, those were aloof parties.

MITCHELL: Or annihilation inappropriate is what I meant (ph).

FORD: Able-bodied maybe we can go into added detail aback there’s added time, I feel time accountability on that question, yes.

MITCHELL: OK.

FORD: Blessed to acknowledgment in added detail if you appetite me to.

GRASSLEY: I’m sorry, go advanced and accomplishment answering your question.

FORD: Oh OK. Did you appetite me to alarm those parties or…

(CORRECTED COPY – CORRECTS SPEAKER IDENTIFICATION)

(UNKNOWN): Shouldn’t we leave this to the aing round, Mr. Chairman?

GRASSLEY: Acknowledgment the question.

FORD: I’m aloof blessed to alarm them if you capital me to and I’m blessed to not. It’s aloof whatever you want.

MITCHELL: Maybe this will —

FORD: Whatever is your preference.

MITCHELL: — cut to the chase. My catechism is was there annihilation abroad that was sexually inappropriate, any inappropriate animal behavior on the allotment of Mr. Kavanaugh arise you at any of these added functions?

FORD: No.

MITCHELL: OK.

GRASSLEY: Abettor Harris.

HARRIS: Dr. Ford, aboriginal of all aloof so we can akin set, you apperceive you are not on trial. You are not on trial. You are sitting actuality afore associates of the United States Senate Attorneys Board because you had the adventuresomeness to arise advanced because as you acquire said, you acquire it was your borough duty.

I was addled in your affidavit by what you adumbrated as your ambition aback you aboriginal let anyone associated with these hearings apperceive about it. And what you basically said is you accomplished out to your adumbrative in the United States Congress, acquisitive that actuality would acquaint the White Abode afore Adjudicator Kavanaugh had been named.

That’s acutely actuating about your activity for advancing forward. And so I appetite to acknowledge you, I appetite to acknowledge you for your adventuresomeness and I appetite to acquaint you I acquire you. I acquire you.

And I acquire abounding Americans above this country acquire you. And what I acquisition arresting about your affidavit is you bethink key afire capacity of what happened to you. You told you bedmate and therapist, two of the best affectionate of your confidants, and you told them years ago about this assault.

You acquire aggregate your acquaintance with assorted accompany years afterwards that and afore these hearings anytime started. I apperceive accepting abandoned prosecuted animal beforehand cases and adolescent animal beforehand cases, that abstraction afterwards abstraction shows trauma, abashment and the abhorrence of after-effects about consistently annual survivors to, at the actual least, adjournment advertisement if they anytime abode at all.

Police admit that, prosecutors admit that, medical and brainy bloom professionals admit that. The addendum from your assay sessions were created connected afore this best and approve what you acquire said today.

You acquire anesthetized a polygraph – polygraph and submitted the after-effects to this committee. Adjudicator Kavanaugh has not. You acquire declared for alfresco assemblage to assert and for able assemblage to testify. Adjudicator Kavanaugh has not.

But best chiefly you acquire declared for an absolute FBI assay into the facts. Adjudicator Kavanaugh has not. And we owe you that, we owe the American bodies that. And let’s allocution about why this is so important.

Contrary to what has been said today, the FBI does not adeptness conclusions. The FBI investigates. It interviews witnesses, gathers facts and afresh presents that admonition to the United States Senate for our application and judgment.

This board knows that, in animosity of what you acquire been told. In 1991 during a agnate hearing, one of my Republican colleagues in this board declared these claims were taken actively by accepting the Federal Bureau of Investigations barrage an assay to actuate their validity.

The FBI accomplished its assignment and issued a arcane report. Able-bodied that could acquire and should acquire been done here. This morning it was said that this could acquire been brash confidentially aback in July, but this additionally could acquire been brash in the aftermost 11 canicule aback you came forward, yet that has not happened.

The FBI could acquire interviewed Mark Judge, Patrick Smith, Leland – Leland Keyser, you and Adjudicator Kavanaugh on these issues. The FBI could acquire brash assorted maps that acquire been presented by the prosecutor who stands in for the United States senators on this committee.

The FBI could acquire aggregate facts about the music or the chat or any added capacity about the acquisition that occurred that evening. That is accustomed activity in a animal beforehand case.

In fact, the chiral that is – was active off by Ms. Mitchell, the chiral that is acquaint on the Maricopa County attorney’s website as a allegorical assumption and best practices for what should arise with animal beforehand cases highlights the capacity of what should arise in agreement of the accusation for an cold assay into any animal beforehand case.

It says, quote, “effective assay requires cooperation with a multi-disciplinary aggregation that includes medical professionals, victim advocates, committed argumentative interviewers, criminalists and added law administration members.”

The chiral additionally stresses the accent of accepting alfresco attestant information. You acquire bravely arise forward, you acquire bravely arise forward. And I appetite to acknowledge you because you acutely acquire annihilation to accretion for what you acquire done, you acquire been a accurate patriot in affronted for the best of who we are as a country.

I acquire you are accomplishing that because you adulation this country and I acquire history will appearance that you are a accurate contour in adventuresomeness at this moment in time in the history of our country. And I acknowledge you.

GRASSLEY: Abettor Kennedy now, so we’ll proceed, Ms. Mitchell.

MITCHELL: Dr. Ford, we’re about done. Aloof a brace apple-pie up questions aboriginal of all. Which – which of your two attorneys did Abettor Feinstein’s arrangement recommend?

FORD: The Katz –

MITCHELL: I’m sorry?

FORD: The Katz firm.

MITCHELL: OK. And aback you – aback you did leave that night, did Leland Keyser – now Keyser anytime hunt up with you and say hey, what happened to you?

FORD: I acquire had communications with her recently.

MITCHELL: I’m talking about like the aing day.

FORD: Oh no, she didn’t apperceive about the event. She was bank during the accident and I did not allotment it with her.

MITCHELL: OK. Acquire you been in – are you acquainted that the three bodies at the affair besides yourself and — and Brett Kavanaugh acquire accustomed statements beneath amends of abomination to the committee?

FORD: Yes.

MITCHELL: And are you acquainted of what those statements say?

FORD: Yes.

MITCHELL: Are you acquainted that they say that they acquire no anamnesis or adeptness of such a party?

FORD: Yes.

MITCHELL: OK. Do you acquire any accurate motives to accredit to Leland?

FORD: I assumption we could booty those one at a time. Leland has cogent bloom challenges, and I’m blessed that she’s absorption on herself and accepting the bloom assay that she needs, and she let me apperceive that she bald her apostle to booty affliction of this for her, and she texted me adapted afterwards with an acknowledgment and acceptable wishes, and et cetera, So I’m animated that she’s demography affliction of herself.

I don’t apprehend that P.J. and Leland would bethink this evening. It was a actual accustomed party. It was not one of their added belled parties, because annihilation arresting happened to them that evening. They were downstairs.

And Mr. Adjudicator is a adapted story. I would apprehend that he would bethink that this happened.

MITCHELL: Understood.

Senator Harris aloof questioned you from the Maricopa County Protocol on Animal Assault. The — that’s the cardboard she was captivation out. Are you acquainted that — and you know, I’ve — I’ve been absolutely afflicted today, because you’ve talked about norepinephrine and cortisol, and what we alarm in the profession, basically, the neurobiological furnishings of trauma. Acquire you additionally accomplished yourself on the best way to get to anamnesis and truth, in agreement of interviewing victims of trauma?

FORD: For me interviewing victims of trauma?

MITCHELL: No, to…

FORD: Oh.

MITCHELL: The best way to do it, the — the best practices for interviewing victims of trauma.

FORD: No.

MITCHELL: OK. Would you acquire me if I told you that there’s no abstraction that says that this ambience in bristles minute increments is the best way to do that?

(LAUGHTER)

(CORRECTED COPY – CORRECTS SPEAKER IDENTIFICATION)

BROMWICH: We’ll accede to that.

(UNKNOWN): We could accede to that.

MITCHELL: Acknowledge you, Counsel.

(UNKNOWN): Agreed.

MITCHELL: Did you apperceive that the best way to do it is to acquire a accomplished accuser allocution to you one-on-one in a clandestine setting, and to let you do the talking, aloof let you do a narrative? Did you apperceive that?

FORD: That makes a — a lot of sense.

MITCHELL: It does accomplish a lot of sense, doesn’t it?

FORD: Yes.

MITCHELL: And afresh to hunt up, obviously, to ample in the capacity and — and ask for clarification. Does that accomplish sense, as well?

FORD: Yes.

MITCHELL: And — and the assay is done by a lot of bodies in the adolescent corruption field. Two of the added arresting ones in the animal beforehand acreage are Geisel and Fisher, who’ve talked about it, and it’s declared a cerebral interview. This is not a cerebral interview.

Did anybody anytime admonish you from Abettor Feinstein’s office, or from Adumbrative Eshoo’s arrangement to go get a argumentative interview?

FORD: No.

MITCHELL: Instead, you were brash to get an apostle and booty a polygraph. Is that right?

FORD: Abounding bodies brash me to get an attorney. Already I had an attorney, my apostle and I discussed a — application the polygraph.

MITCHELL: And instead of appointment to an annual in California, we’re accepting a audition actuality today in five-minute increments. Is that right?

FORD: I — I accede that’s what was agreed aloft by the accommodating accumulation here.

MITCHELL: OK. Acknowledge you. I acquire no added questions.

GRASSLEY: OK, I acquire commodity to accept for the record. We accustomed three statements beneath amends of abomination from three assemblage articular by Dr. Ford: Mark Judge, Leland Keyser and Patrick Smyth. All three denied any adeptness of the incident, or a acquisition declared by Dr. Ford. Afterwards objection, I’ll admission in the record.

BLUMENTHAL: Mr. Chairman, I acquire commodity for the record, as well…

GRASSLEY: A…

BLUMENTHAL: … a cardinal of belletrist from the witness’s ancestors friends, including her husband.

GRASSLEY: OK. I’ll get you aloof as anon as the baronial member.

FEINSTEIN: Mr. Chairman, I acquire three belletrist addressed to both you and the baronial member, and I’d ask that they be entered into the record.

GRASSLEY: Afterwards objection.

FEINSTEIN: And it’s additionally my compassionate that Mr. Adjudicator is not accommodating to arise advanced to acknowledgment our questions. As a result, we cannot assay his memory, or accomplish any appraisal of his absorption or character. And I advanced that’s why the abortion to alarm him to assert is so actual critical, and I accomplishment the majority would amend that.

GRASSLEY: OK.

Senator Blumenthal?

BLUMENTHAL: Mr. Chairman, I ask if you acquire affidavit statements that you’re appointment for the record, that we acquire those individuals arise afore us so that we can ask them questions about those statements. I advanced that the attributes of this proceeding would be compromised if we abridgement an befalling to ask them questions about affidavit statements that will be allotment of the record. So frankly, Mr. Chairman, I would commodity to entering them in the record.

WHITEHOUSE: Mr. Chairman?

GRASSLEY: OK, Abettor Whitehouse?

WHITEHOUSE: I acquire a cardinal of belletrist that I would like to ask submitted to the almanac that chronicle to the accent of able assay by accomplished professionals in affairs these affectionate of — of investigations together, from the Administration Arrangement on Civilian and Animal Rights, the Borough Women’s Law Center, the Borough Organization For Women, and so forth.

(CROSSTALK)

GRASSLEY: Afterwards objection. Abettor Kennedy?

KENNEDY: Mr. Chairman, I acquire a catechism for our chairman. The — the — the statements that Abettor Blumenthal talked about, those were statements taken by our majority staff, is that…

GRASSLEY: They’re — they’re — they’re already in the record.

KENNEDY: Yes, sir, but those statements were taken by our majority staff?

GRASSLEY: Yes.

KENNEDY: Did boyhood agents participate?

GRASSLEY: No.

KENNEDY: Why not?

GRASSLEY: You’ll acquire to ask them.

KENNEDY: Well, were they instructed not to participate?

GRASSLEY: No.

KENNEDY: They chose not to?

GRASSLEY: That’s right.

FEINSTEIN: If I may, Mr. Chairman, I was told the boyhood agents was not notified.

(CROSSTALK)

KENNEDY: If — if — if I could, I still advanced I acquire the forum, Senator.

GRASSLEY: Let’s acquire to Abettor Feinstein.

(CORRECTED COPY – CORRECTS SPEAKER IDENTIFICATION)

BROMWICH: Can — can we be excused?

FEINSTEIN: I am told by staff…

(CORRECTED COPY – CORRECTS SPEAKER IDENTIFICATION)

BROMWICH: The attestant is absolutely tired. She’d like to be excused.

GRASSLEY: I’d would like — I’d like to — if you’d adjournment aloof a minute, I’d like to acknowledge Dr. Ford.

(CORRECTED COPY – CORRECTS SPEAKER IDENTIFICATION)

BROMWICH: OK. All right.

GRASSLEY: In fact, we’re activity to accept this meeting, and we can — so let’s aloof be nice to her.

(LAUGHTER)

Dr. Ford, Dr. Ford, I — I can abandoned allege as one of 21 senators here, but I acknowledge you actual abundant for your testimony, added importantly, for your adventuresomeness advancing out, and aggravating to acknowledgment our questions as best you could remember. Acknowledge you actual much. We’ll curb for 45 annual — or, not adjourn. Alcove for 45 minutes.

SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE HEARING ON THE NOMINATION OF BRETT M.KAVANAUGH TO BE AN ASSOCIATE JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT, DAY 5,FOCUSING ON ALLEGATIONS OF SEXUAL ASSAULT, PART 2

SEPTEMBER 27, 2018

SPEAKERS:SEN. CHARLES E. GRASSLEY, R-IOWA, CHAIRMAN

SEN. ORRIN G. HATCH, R-UTAH

SEN. LINDSEY GRAHAM, R-S.C.

SEN. JOHN CORNYN, R-TEXAS

SEN. MIKE LEE, R-UTAH

SEN. TED CRUZ, R-TEXAS

SEN. JEFF FLAKE, R-ARIZ.

SEN. THOM TILLIS, R-N.C.

SEN. BEN SASSE, R-NEB.

SEN. MICHAEL D. CRAPO, R-IDAHO

SEN. JOHN KENNEDY, R-LA.

SEN. DIANNE FEINSTEIN, D-CALIF., RANKING MEMBER

SEN. PATRICK J. LEAHY, D-VT.

SEN. RICHARD J. DURBIN, D-ILL.

SEN. SHELDON WHITEHOUSE, D-R.I.

SEN. AMY KLOBUCHAR, D-MINN.

SEN. CHRIS COONS, D-DEL.

SEN. RICHARD BLUMENTHAL, D-CONN.

SEN. MAZIE K. HIRONO, D-HAWAII

SEN. CORY BOOKER, D-N.J.

SEN. KAMALA HARRIS, D-CALIF.

RACHEL MITCHELL, STAFF COUNSEL

WITNESSES:JUDGE BRETT M. KAVANAUGH, NOMINATED TO BE AN ASSOCIATE JUSTICE OFTHE SUPREME COURT

[*]GRASSLEY: Adjudicator Kavanaugh, we acceptable you. Are you ready?

KAVANAUGH: I am.

GRASSLEY: I acquire a — I acquire a — commodity I appetite to ablaze up from the aftermost affair that doesn’t affect you. So afore I assert you, I would like to explain my acknowledgment to Abettor Kennedy adapted afterwards the break.

At that time, I entered into the almanac statements of three assemblage Dr. Ford said were additionally at the party. These statements were provided to us beneath amends of abomination by lying to — if you lie to Congress. As anon as my aggregation abstruse the names of these three abeyant witnesses, we anon accomplished out to them, requesting an interview. In response, all three submitted statements to us abstinent any adeptness of the acquisition Dr. Ford described.

If we had calls with them, we would’ve arrive the boyhood to join. Every time that we’ve accustomed any admonition apropos Adjudicator Kavanaugh, we’ve accustomed to anon hunt through and investigate. The boyhood agents sat on Dr. Ford’s letter for weeks, and agents told us that they believed it is, quote, “highly inappropriate to acquire these aftereffect calls afore the FBI finishes its investigation,” end of quote, akin admitting the FBI had completed its accomplishments information.

When we followed up with Adjudicator Kavanaugh afterwards we accustomed Dr. Ford’s allegations, the baronial member’s agents didn’t accompany us, akin admitting these calls are usually done on a bipartisan basis. They aing added calls with the judge, but they didn’t participate or ask any questions.

Would you amuse rise, sir?

KAVANAUGH: Yes.

GRASSLEY: Do you assert that the affidavit you’re about to accord afore the board will be the truth, the accomplished accurateness and annihilation but the truth, so admonition you God?

KAVANAUGH: I do.

GRASSLEY: Yeah. And like we — like we offered to abettor — or, to Dr. Ford, you can booty whatever time you appetite now for your aperture statement, and afresh we’ll go to questions. So proceed.

KAVANAUGH: Mr. Chairman, Baronial Affiliate Feinstein, associates of the committee, acknowledge you for acceptance me to accomplish my statement. I wrote it myself bygone afternoon and evening. No one has aboveboard a draft, or it, except for one of my above law clerks. This is my statement.

Less than two weeks ago, Dr. Ford about accused me of committing atrocity at an accident added than 36 years ago aback we were both in aerial school. I denied the accusation immediately, absolutely and unequivocally. All four bodies allegedly at the event, including Dr. Ford’s longtime friend, Ms. Keyser, acquire said they anamnesis no such event. Her longtime friend, Ms. Keyser, said beneath amends of abomination that she does not apperceive me, and does not acquire she anytime saw me at a party, ever.

Here is the adduce from Ms. Keyser’s attorney’s letter: quote, “Simply put, Ms. Keyser does not apperceive Mr. Kavanaugh, and she has no bond of anytime actuality at a affair or acquisition above he was present, with or afterwards Dr. Ford,” end quote. Advanced about that fact.

The day afterwards the accusation appeared, I told this board that I capital a audition as anon as accessible to ablaze my name. I accustomed a audition for the actual aing day. Unfortunately, it took the board 10 canicule to get to this hearing. In those 10 connected days, as was predictable, and as I predicted, my ancestors and my name acquire been absolutely and assuredly destroyed by abandoned and apocryphal added accusations. The 10-day adjournment has been adverse to me and my family, to the Supreme Cloister and to the country.

When this accusation aboriginal arose, I accustomed any affectionate of investigation, Senate, FBI or otherwise. The board now has conducted a absolute investigation, and I’ve cooperated fully. I apperceive that any affectionate of assay — Senate, FBI, Montgomery County Badge — whatever, will ablaze me. Acquire to the bodies I know. Acquire to the bodies who’ve accustomed me my accomplished life. Acquire to the bodies I’ve developed up with, and formed with, and played with, and accomplished with, and dated, and taught, and gone to amateur with, and had beers with. And acquire to the assemblage who allegedly were at this accident 36 years ago. Acquire to Ms. Keyser. She does not apperceive me. I was not at the affair declared by Dr. Ford.

This acceptance activity has become a borough disgrace. The Constitution gives the Senate an important role in the acceptance process, but you acquire replaced admonition and accord with chase and destroy.

Since my best in July, there’s been a aberration on the larboard to arise up with something, annihilation to block my confirmation. Shortly afterwards I was nominated, the Democratic Senate baton said he would, quote, “oppose me with aggregate he’s got.” A Democratic abettor on this board about — about referred to me as affronted — evil. Advanced about that word. It’s said that those who accurate me were, quote, “complicit in evil.” Accession Democratic abettor on this board said, quote, “Judge Kavanaugh is your affliction nightmare.” A above arch of the Democratic Borough Board said, quote, “Judge Kavanaugh will corruption the lives of millions of Americans for decades to come.”

I acquire the passions of the moment, but I would say to those senators, your words acquire meaning. Millions of Americans acquire anxiously to you. Accustomed comments like those, is it any abruptness that bodies acquire been accommodating to do annihilation to accomplish any concrete blackmail adjoin my family, to accelerate any agitated e-mail to my wife, to accomplish any affectionate of accusation adjoin me and adjoin my friends. To draft me up and booty me down.

You sowed the wind for decades to come. I abhorrence that the accomplished country will acquire the whirlwind.

The behavior of several of the Democratic associates of this board at my audition a few weeks ago was an embarrassment. But at atomic it was aloof a acceptable ancient beforehand at Borking.

Those efforts didn’t work. Aback I did at atomic OK abundant at the hearings that it looked like I adeptness absolutely get confirmed, a new tactic was needed.

Some of you were lying in adjournment and had it ready. This aboriginal accusation was captivated in abstruse for weeks by a Democratic affiliate of this committee, and by staff. It would be bald abandoned if you couldn’t booty me out on the merits.

When it was needed, this accusation was unleashed and about deployed over Dr. Ford’s wishes. And afresh — and afresh as no agnosticism was accustomed — if not planned — came a connected alternation of apocryphal last-minute smears brash to alarm me and drive me out of the activity afore any audition occurred.

Crazy stuff. Gangs, adulterine children, fights on boats in Rhode Island. All , arise breathlessly and about uncritically by the media.

This has destroyed my ancestors and my acceptable name. A acceptable name congenital up through decades of actual adamantine assignment and accessible annual at the accomplished levels of the American government.

This accomplished two-week accomplishment has been a afflicted and orrated political hit, fueled with aboveboard pent-up acrimony about Admiral Trump and the 2016 election. Abhorrence that has been unfairly stoked about my authoritative record. Acrimony on annual of the Clintons. and millions of dollars in money from alfresco left-wing activity groups.

This is a circus. The after-effects will extend connected accomplished my nomination. The after-effects will be with us for decades. This aberrant and accommodating appearance assassination will dissuade competent and acceptable bodies of all political persuasions, from confined our country.

And as we all know, in the United States political arrangement of the aboriginal 2000s, what goes about comes around. I am an optimistic guy. I consistently try to be on the aurora ancillary of the mountain, to be optimistic about the day that is coming.

But today, I acquire to say that I abhorrence for the future. Aftermost time I was here, I told this board that a federal adjudicator accusation be independent, not affected by accessible or political pressure.

I said I was such a judge, and I am. I will not be abashed into abandoning from this process. You’ve accustomed hard. You’ve accustomed it your all. No one can catechism your effort, but your accommodating and well-funded accomplishment to abort my acceptable name and to abort my ancestors will not drive me out. The abandoned threats of abandon adjoin my ancestors will not drive me out.

You may defeat me in the final vote, but you’ll never get me to quit. Never.

I’m actuality today to acquaint the truth. I’ve never sexually assaulted anyone. Not in aerial school, not in college, not ever. Animal beforehand is horrific. One of my aing accompany to this day is a woman who was sexually abused and who, in the 1990s aback we were in our 30s, confided in me about the corruption and accustomed my advice. I was one of the abandoned bodies she consulted.

Allegations of animal beforehand accusation consistently be taken seriously, always. Those who accomplish allegations consistently deserve to be heard.

At the aforementioned time, the actuality who was the accountable of the allegations additionally deserves to be heard. Due activity is a foundation of the American aphorism of law. Due activity bureau alert to both sides.

As I told you at my audition three weeks ago, I’m the abandoned adolescent of Martha and Ed Kavanaugh. They’re actuality today. Aback I was 10, my mom went to law school. And as a lawyer, she formed adamantine and overcame barriers, including the abode animal aggravation that so abounding women faced (ph) at that time and still face today.

She became a trailblazer, one of Maryland’s ancient women prosecutors and balloon judges. She and my dad accomplished me the accent of adequation and annual for all people, and she advancing me to be a apostle and a judge.

Last time I was here, I told you that aback my mom was a prosecutor and I was in aerial school, she acclimated to convenance her closing arguments at the dining allowance table, on my dad and me.

As I told you, her brand band was, “Use your accustomed sense. What rings true? What rings false?” Her brand band is a acceptable reminder, as we sit actuality today, some 36 years afterwards the declared accident occurred aback there is no acceptance and absolutely it is refuted by the bodies allegedly there.

After I’ve been in the accessible amphitheatre for 26 years afterwards akin a adumbration — a aroma — of an accusation like this. And aback my best to the Supreme Cloister was aloof about to be voted on, at a time aback I’m declared “evil” by a Democratic affiliate of this committee, while Democratic opponents of my best say bodies will die if I am confirmed.

This aggression of last-minute allegations does not amphitheatre true. I’m not ytic that Dr. Ford may acquire been sexually assaulted by some actuality in some abode at some time. But I acquire never done this. To her or to anyone. That’s not who I am. It is not who I was. I am innocent of this charge.

I intend no ill will to Dr. Ford and her family. The added night, Ashley and my daughter, Liza, said their prayers. And little Liza — all of 10 years old — said to Ashley, “We should adjure for the woman.” It’s a lot of acumen from a 10-year old. We beggarly — we beggarly no ill will.

First, let’s alpha with my career. For the aftermost 26 years, aback 1992, I acquire served in abounding aerial contour and acute government positions for which the FBI has brash my accomplishments six abstracted times. Six abstracted FBI accomplishments investigations over 26 years. All of them afterwards the elent (ph) — accident declared here. I acquire been in the accessible amphitheatre and beneath acute accessible assay for decades.

In 1992, I formed for the Arrangement of Solicitor General in the Department of Justice. In 1993, I clerked on the Supreme Cloister for Amends Anthony Kennedy. I spent 4 years at the Absolute Counsel’s arrangement during the 1990s. That arrangement was the accountable of astronomic assay from the media and the public. During 1998, the year of the accusation of Admiral Clinton, our arrangement about and I abandoned were in the boilerplate of an acute borough media and political spotlight.

I and added arch associates of Ken Starr’s arrangement were activity researched from arch to toe, from bearing through the present day. Anamnesis the bodies who were aboveboard that year of 1998 as accepting in affianced in some animal atrocity or indiscretions in their pasts. One actuality on the larboard akin paid a actor dollars for bodies to abode affirmation of animal wrongdoing, and it worked. Aboveboard some arresting people. Annihilation about me.

From 2001 to 2006, I formed for Admiral George W. Bush in the White House. As Agents Secretary, I was by Admiral Bush’s ancillary for 3 years and was entrusted with the nation’s best acute secrets. I all-embracing on Air Force One all over the country and the apple with Admiral Bush. I went everywhere with him, from Texas to Pakistan, from Alaska to Australia, from Buckingham Palace to the Vatican. Three years in the West Wing, 5 1/2 years in the White House.

I was afresh nominated to be a adjudicator on the D.C. Circuit. I was thoroughly vetted by the White House, the FBI, the American Bar Association, and this committee. I sat afore this board for two absolute acceptance hearings in 2004 and 2006.

For the accomplished 12 years arch up to my best for this job, I’ve served in a actual accessible amphitheatre as a federal adjudicator on what is about referred to as the second-most important cloister in the country. I’ve handled some of the best cogent acute cases affecting the lives and liberties of the American people.

I acquire been a acceptable judge. And for this nomination, accession FBI accomplishments investigation, accession American Bar Affiliation investigation, 31 hours of hearings, 65 abettor meetings, 1,200 accounting questions, added than all antecedent Supreme Cloister nominees combined.

Throughout that absolute time, throughout my 53 years and 7 months on this Earth, until aftermost week, no one anytime accused me of any affectionate of animal misconduct. No one, ever. A lifetime. A lifetime of accessible annual and a lifetime of high-profile accessible annual at the accomplished levels of American government and never a adumbration of annihilation of this kind, and that’s because annihilation of this affectionate anytime happened.

Second, let’s about-face to specifics. I absolutely and absolutely abjure the accusation adjoin me by Dr. Ford. I never had any animal or concrete arrangement of any affectionate with Dr. Ford. I never abounding a acquisition like the one Dr. Ford describes in her allegation. I’ve never sexually assaulted Dr. Ford or anyone.

Again, I am not ytic that Dr. Ford may acquire been sexually assaulted by some actuality in some abode at some time. But I acquire never done that to her or to anyone.

Dr. Ford’s accusation stems from a affair that she alleges occurred during the summer of 1982, 36 years ago. I was 17 years old, amid my inferior and chief years of aerial academy at Georgetown Prep, a accurate all-boys All-embracing Jesuit Aerial Academy in Rockville, Maryland. Aback my accompany and I spent time calm at parties on weekends, it was usually the — with accompany from adjacent All-embracing all-girls aerial schools, Stone Ridge, Angelic Child, Visitation, Immaculata, Angelic Cross.

Dr. Ford did not arise one of those schools. She abounding an absolute clandestine academy declared Holton-Arms and she was a year abaft me. She and I did not biking in the aforementioned amusing circles. It is accessible that we met at some point at some events, although I do not anamnesis that. To repeat, all of the bodies articular by Dr. Ford as actuality present at the affair acquire said they do not bethink any such affair anytime happening.

Importantly her friend, Ms. Keyser, has not abandoned denied adeptness of the party, Ms. Keyser said beneath amends of abomination she does not apperceive me, does not anamnesis anytime actuality at a affair with me ever. And my two macho accompany who were allegedly there, who knew me well, acquire told this board beneath amends of abomination that they do not anamnesis any such affair and that I never did or would do annihilation like this.

Dr. Ford’s accusation is not abandoned uncorroborated, it is refuted by the actual bodies she says were there, including by a adept acquaintance of hers. Refuted.

Third, Dr. Ford has said that this accident occurred at a abode a Columbia Country Club, which is at the bend of Connecticut Avenue in the East-West Highway in Chevy Chase, Maryland. In her letter to Abettor Feinstein, she said that there were four added bodies at the abode but none of those people, nor I, lived a Columbia Country Club.

As of the summer of 1982, Dr. Ford was 15 and could not drive yet and she did not alive a Columbia Country Club. She says confidently that she had one beer at the party, but she does not say how she got to the abode in catechism or how she got home or whose abode it was.

Fourth, I acquire submitted to this board abundant calendars recording my activities in the summer of 1982. Why did I accumulate calendars? My dad started befitting abundant calendars of his activity in 1978. He did so as both a calendar and a diary. He was a actual organized guy, to put it mildly. Christmas time, we’d sit about and he regales us with old stories, old milestones, old weddings, old challenge from his calendars.

In ninth brand — in ninth grade, in 1980, I started befitting calendars of my own. For me, also, it’s both a calendar and a diary. I’ve kept such calendar as affidavit for the aftermost 38 years; abundance are not as acceptable as my dad’s in some years. And aback I was a kid, the calendars are about what you would apprehend from a kid; some cool parts, some awkward parts.

But I did acquire the summer of 1982 accurate appealing well. The accident declared by Dr. Ford, allegedly happened on a weekend because I believed anybody formed and had jobs in the summers. And in any event, a bashed aboriginal black accident of the affectionate she describes, allegedly happened on a weekend.

If it was a weekend, my calendars appearance that I was out of boondocks about every weekend night afore football training affected started in backward August. The abandoned weekend nights that I was in D.C. were Friday, June 4, aback I was with my dad at a pro golf clash and had my aerial academy accomplishment assay at 8:30 the aing morning.

Restore 15 Inc - Damage Restoration - 15 E Greenway Pkwy ..
Restore 15 Inc – Damage Restoration – 15 E Greenway Pkwy .. | maricopa county family court forms

I additionally was in D.C. on Saturday night, August 7th. But I was at a baby acquisition at Becky’s abode in Rockville with Matt, Denise, Laurie and Jenny. Their names are all listed on my calendar. I won’t use their aftermost names here.

And afresh on the weekend of August 20 to 22nd, I was blockage at the Garrets’ (ph) with Pat (ph) and Chris (ph) as we did final affairs for football training affected that began on Sunday, the 22nd. As the calendars’ confirm, the — that weekend afore a barbarous training affected calendar was no time for parities.

So let me accent this point. If the affair declared by Dr. Ford happened in the summer of 1982 on a weekend night, my calendar shows all but definitively that I was not there.

During the weekdays in the summer of 1982, as you can see, I was out of boondocks for two weeks of the summer for a cruise to the bank with accompany and at the allegorical Five-Star Basketball Affected in Honesdale, Pennsylvania. Aback I was in town, I spent abundant of my time working, alive out, appropriation weights, amphitheatre basketball, or blind out and accepting some beers with accompany as we talked about life, and football, and academy and girls.

Some acquire noticed that I didn’t acquire abbey on Sundays on my calendars. I additionally didn’t annual abrasion my teeth. And for me, activity to abbey on Sundays was like abrasion my teeth, automatic. It still is.

In the summer of 1981, I had formed construction. In the summer of 1982, my job was acid lawns. I had my own business of sorts. You see some specifics about the backyard acid listed on the August calendar page, aback I had to time the aftermost backyard cuttings of the summer of assorted lawns afore football training camp.

I played in a lot of summer alliance basketball amateur for the Georgetown Prep aggregation at night at Blair Aerial Academy in Silver Spring. Abounding nights, I formed out with added guys at Tobin’s house. He was the abundant quarterback on our football aggregation and his dad ran workouts — or aerial weights at Georgetown Prep in alertness for the football season. I abounding and watched abounding antic events, as is my addiction to this day.

The calendars appearance a few weekday gatherings at friends’ houses afterwards a conditioning or aloof to accommodated up and acquire some beers. But none of those gatherings included the accumulation of bodies that Dr. Ford has identified. And as my calendars show, I was actual absolute about advertisement who was there; actual precise.

And befitting — accumulate in mind, my calendars additionally were affidavit of sorts, advanced and backward-looking, aloof like my dad’s. You can see, for example, that I above out absent workouts and the canceled doctor’s appointments, and that I listed the absolute bodies who had aboveboard up for assertive events. The calendars are acutely not dispositive on their own, but they are accession allotment of affirmation for you to consider.

Fifth, Dr. Ford’s accusation is radically inconsistent with my almanac and my appearance from my adolescence to the present day. As acceptance at an all-boys all-embracing Jesuit school, abounding of us became accompany and accept accompany to this day with acceptance at bounded all-embracing all-girls schools.

One amore of my activity that has remained accurate to the present day is that I acquire consistently had a lot of aing changeable friends. I’m not talking about girlfriends; I’m talking about accompany who are women. That started in aerial school. Maybe it was because I’m an abandoned adolescent and had no sisters.

But anyway, we had no amusing media, or texts, or e-mail and we talked on the phone. I bethink talking about every night it seemed, to my accompany Amy, or Julie, or Kristin, or Karen, or Suzanne, or Moira, or Megan, or Nikki (ph). The annual goes on — accompany for a lifetime, congenital on a foundation of talking through academy and life, starting at age 14. Several of those abundant women are in the seats adapted abaft me today.

My accompany and I sometimes got calm and had parties on weekends. The bubbler age was 18 in Maryland for best of my time in aerial school, and was 18 in D.C. for all of my time in aerial school. I drank beer with my friends. About anybody did. Sometimes I had too abounding beers. Sometimes others did. I admired beer. I still like beer. But I did not booze beer to the point of blacking out, and I never sexually assaulted anyone.

There is a ablaze band amid bubbler beer, which I acquiescently do, and which I absolutely embrace, and sexually assaulting someone, which is a agitated crime. If every American who drinks beer or every American who drank beer in aerial academy is aback accustomed accusable of animal assault, will be an ugly, new abode in this country. I never committed animal assault.

As aerial academy students, we sometimes did cool or brainless things. I agnosticism we are abandoned in attractive aback in aerial academy and abject at some things.

For one thing, our annual was a disaster. I advanced some editors and acceptance capital the annual to be some aggregate of Animal House, Caddy Shack and Fast Times at Ridgemont High, which were all contempo movies at that time. Abounding of us went alternating in the annual to the point of absurdity. This accomplished week, my accompany and I acquire cringed aback we apprehend about it and talked to anniversary other.

One affair in accurate we’re sad about: one of our acceptable — one of our acceptable changeable accompany who we would adore and went to dances with had her names acclimated on the annual folio with the appellation “alumnus.” That annual advertence was clumsily brash to appearance affection, and that she was one of us. But in this circus, the media’s interpreted the appellation is accompanying to sex. It was not accompanying to sex. As the woman herself acclaimed to the media on the record, she and I never had any six — animal alternation of — at all. I’m so apologetic to her for that annual reference. This may complete a bit trivial, accustomed all that we are actuality for, but one affair I appetite to try to accomplish abiding — abiding of in the approaching is my accord with her. She was and is a abundant person.

As to sex, this is not a affair I anytime cool would arise up at a authoritative acceptance hearing, but I appetite to accord you a abounding annual of who I was. I never had animal intercourse, or annihilation aing to it, during aerial school, or for abounding years afterwards that. In some crowds, I was allegedly a little evidently shy about my inexperience; accustomed to adumbrate that. At the aforementioned time, I was additionally inwardly appreciative of it. For me and the girls who I was accompany with, that abridgement of above advancing animal activity in aerial academy was a amount of acceptance and annual and caution.

The board has a letter from 65 women who knew me in aerial school. They said that I consistently brash them with abode and respect. That letter came calm in one night, 35 years afterwards graduation, while a animal beforehand accusation was awaiting adjoin me in a actual abounding (ph) and accessible bearings above they knew — they knew they’d be vilified if they dedicated me. Advanced about that. They put theirselves (sic) on the band for me. Those are some alarming women, and I adulation all of them.

You additionally acquire a letter from women who knew me in college. Best were varsity athletes, and they declared that I brash them as accompany and equals, and accurate them in their sports at a time aback women’s sports was arising in the deathwatch of Title IX. I acknowledge all of them for all of their texts, and their emails, and their support. One of those women accompany from college, a self-described advanced and feminist, beatific me a argument aftermost night that said, quote, “Deep breaths. You’re a acceptable man, a acceptable man, a acceptable man.”

A argument bygone from accession of those women accompany from academy said, quote, “Brett, be strong. Affairs for you to my core.” A third argument bygone from yet accession of those women I’m accompany with from academy said, “I’m captivation you in the ablaze of God.”

As I said in my aperture annual the aftermost time I was with you, admire your friends, accessory out for your friends, lift up your friends, adulation your friends. I’ve acquainted that adulation added over the aftermost two weeks than I anytime acquire in my life. I acknowledge all my friends. I adulation all my friends.

Throughout my life, I’ve adherent huge efforts to auspicious and announcement the careers of women. I will put my almanac up adjoin anyone’s, macho or female. I am appreciative of the letter from 84 women — 84 women — who formed with me at the Bush White Abode from 2001 to 2006, and declared me as, quote, “a man of the accomplished integrity.”

Read the op-ed from Sarah Day (ph) from Yarmouth, Maine. She formed in Oval Arrangement operations, alfresco of Admiral Bush’s office. Here’s what she afresh wrote in centralmaine.com, and today she stands by her comments.

Quote, “Brett was an apostle for adolescent women like me. He encouraged me to booty on added albatross and to feel assured in my role. In fact, during the 2004 Republican Borough Convention, Brett gave me the befalling to admonition with the alertness and assay of the president’s remarks, commodity I never (ph)…

… “something I never would acquire had the adventitious to do if he had not included me. And he didn’t aloof board me in the work. He fabricated abiding I was at Madison Aboveboard Garden to watch the president’s speech, instead of aback at the hotel, watching it on TV.” End quote.

As a adjudicator aback 2006, I’ve had the advantage of hiring four contempo law academy graduates to serve as my law clerks anniversary year. The law clerks for federal board are the best and brightest graduates of American law schools. They assignment for one-year agreement for board afterwards law school, and afresh they move on in their careers.

For judges, training these adolescent attorneys is an important responsibility. The clerks will become the aing bearing of American attorneys and leaders, board and senators.

Just afterwards I took the bank in 2006, there was a above New York Times adventure about the low numbers of women law clerks at the Supreme Cloister and federal appeals courts.

I took notice, and I took action. A majority of my 48 law clerks over the aftermost 12 years acquire been women.

In a letter to this committee, my women law clerks said I was one of the arch advocates in the federal attorneys for women lawyers. And they wrote that the accustomed profession is fairer and added according because of me.

In my time on the bench, no federal adjudicator — not a distinct one in the country — has beatific added women law clerks to abettor on the Supreme Cloister than I have.

Before this accusation arose two weeks ago, I was adapted to alpha authoritative assertive authoritative affairs for my accessible alteration to the Supreme Court, aloof in case I was confirmed.

As allotment of that, I had to, in essence, contingently appoint a aboriginal accumulation of four law clerks who could be accessible to abettor at the Supreme Cloister for me on a moment’s notice.

I did so, and contingently assassin four law clerks. All four are women. If confirmed, I’ll be the aboriginal amends in the history of the Supreme Cloister to acquire a accumulation of all-women law clerks.

That is who I am. That is who I was. Over the accomplished 12 years, I’ve accomplished built-in law to hundreds of students, primarily at Harvard Law School, above (ph) I was assassin by then-dean and now-Justice Elena Kagan.

One of my above women students, a Democrat, testified to this board that I was an balanced assistant who treats bodies adequately and with respect.

In a letter to this committee, my above acceptance — macho and changeable akin — wrote that I displayed “a appearance that afflicted us all.” I admired teaching law. But acknowledgment to what some of you on this ancillary of the board acquire unleashed, I may never be able to admonish again.

For the accomplished seven years, I’ve accomplished my two daughters’ basketball teams. You saw abounding of those girls aback they came to my audition for a brace of hours. You acquire a letter from the parents of the girls I coach, that alarm my dedication, accusation and character.

I drillmaster because I apperceive that a girl’s aplomb on the basketball cloister translates into aplomb in added aspects of life. I adulation apprenticeship added than annihilation I’ve anytime done in my accomplished life. But acknowledgment to what some of you on this ancillary of the board acquire unleashed, I may never be able to drillmaster again.

I’ve been a adjudicator for 12 years. I acquire a connected almanac of annual to America and to the Constitution. I admire the Constitution. I am acutely beholden to Admiral Trump for nominating me. He was so accommodating to my ancestors and me on the July night he arise my best at the White House. I acknowledge him for his abiding support.

When I accustomed the president’s nomination, Ashley and I knew this activity would be challenging. We never accustomed that it would devolve into this. Acknowledgment this to our daughters has been about the affliction acquaintance of our lives.

Ashley has been a rock. I acknowledge God every day for Ashley and my family. We alive in a country adherent to due activity and the aphorism of law. That bureau demography allegations seriously.

But if the bald accusation — the bald affirmation of an accusation — a refuted accusation from 36 years ago is abundant to abort a person’s activity and career, we will acquire abandoned the basal attempt of artlessness and due activity that ascertain our accustomed arrangement and our country.

I ask you to adjudicator me by the accustomed that you would appetite activated to your father, your husband, your brother or your son. My ancestors and I intend no ill will adjoin Dr. Ford or her family.

But I assert today — beneath oath, afore the Senate and the nation; afore my ancestors and God — I am innocent of this charge.

GRASSLEY: Acknowledge you, Adjudicator Kavanaugh.

Before we alpha questions, I won’t echo what I said this morning but we’ll do it the aforementioned way as we did for Dr. Ford. And five-minute rounds. And so we will alpha with Ms. Mitchell.

MITCHELL: Acceptable afternoon, Adjudicator Kavanaugh. We acquire not met. My name is Rachel Mitchell.

I’d like to go over a brace of guidelines for our question-and-answer affair today. If I ask a question…

KAVANAUGH: Yes, I’m ready.

MITCHELL: OK. If I ask a question…

KAVANAUGH: Acknowledge you.

MITCHELL: If I ask a catechism that you do not understand, amuse ask me to yze it, or ask it in a adapted way. I may ask a catechism above I absorb some admonition you’ve already provided. If I get it wrong, amuse actual me. I’m not activity to ask you to guess. If you do estimate, amuse let me apperceive you’re estimating.

Now, I appetite to accomplish abiding that all of the board associates acquire gotten a archetype of the ogue of animal behavior.

GRASSLEY: Yes, at atomic I acquire one.

MITCHELL: OK.

GRASSLEY: Yeah.

MITCHELL: And you acquire that, as well, Adjudicator Kavanaugh?

KAVANAUGH: Yeah.

MITCHELL: OK. Aboriginal of all, acquire you been accustomed or brash a archetype of the questions that I will be allurement you?

KAVANAUGH: No.

MITCHELL: Has anyone told you the questions that I will be allurement you?

KAVANAUGH: No.

MITCHELL: I appetite you to booty a moment to assay the ogue that’s afore you of animal behavior.

MITCHELL: Acquire you had a adventitious to assay it?

KAVANAUGH: I have. I may accredit aback to it, if I can?

MITCHELL: Yes, please.

I’d like to point out two specific parts. Amid the examples of animal behavior, it includes abrading or acid your genitals adjoin somebody, clothed or unclothed. And I would additionally point out that the ogue applies whether or not the acts were sexually motivated or, for example, horseplay. Do you acquire the ogue I acquire accustomed you?

KAVANAUGH: I do.

MITCHELL: And again, if at any time you accusation to assay that, amuse — amuse let me know.

Dr. Ford has declared that about amid bristles or six bodies were present at the acquisition on this date: you, Mark Judge, Leland Ingham — at the time, or Leland Keyser now, Patrick P.J. Smyth, Dr. Ford and — and an bearding boy. Do you apperceive Mark Judge?

KAVANAUGH: I do.

MITCHELL: How do you apperceive him?

KAVANAUGH: He was a acquaintance at Georgetown Prep, starting in ninth grade. He’s a — accession we would — in our, you know, accumulation of friends. We’re a actual affable accumulation in class. He saw the letter that’s been beatific by my accompany from Georgetown Prep. Funny guy, abundant writer, popular, developed a austere addiction botheration that lasted decades. A afterlife a brace times from his addiction. Suffered abundantly from.

MITCHELL: What is your accord with him like now?

KAVANAUGH: I haven’t talked to him in a brace years. We’ve allegedly been on, you know, accumulation e-mails that — or, accumulation e-mails that go about amid my aerial academy friends.

MITCHELL: And how did you apperceive Patrick Smyth?

KAVANAUGH: Additionally ninth grade, Georgetown Prep. Went by P.J. then. He and I lived aing to one another. Played football together, he was arresting tackle, I was the quarterback and advanced receiver. We carpooled to academy alternating with De Davis (ph) every year, the three of us for two years. I didn’t acquire a car, so one of the two of them would drive every day. And I’d be in the (ph), you know, they’d aces me up.

MITCHELL: What’s your accord like with him now?

KAVANAUGH: He lives in the area. I see him already in a while. I haven’t aboveboard him aback this — this thing.

MITCHELL: OK. Do you apperceive Leland Ingham or Leland Keyser?

KAVANAUGH: I — I apperceive of her. And it — it’s accessible I, you know, saw — met her in aerial academy at some point at some event. Yes, I apperceive — I apperceive of her and, again, I don’t appetite to aphorism out accepting above paths with her in aerial school.

MITCHELL: Agnate to your statements about alive Dr. Ford?

KAVANAUGH: Correct.

MITCHELL: OK.

GRASSLEY: Abettor Feinstein.

FEINSTEIN: Adjudicator Kavanaugh, it’s my compassionate that you acquire denied the allegations by Dr. Ford, Ms. Ramirez and Ms. Swetnick. Is that correct?

KAVANAUGH: Yes.

FEINSTEIN: All three of these women acquire asked the FBI to investigate their claims. I listened anxiously to what you said. Your affair is axiomatic and clear. And if you’re actual assured of your position, and you arise to be, why aren’t you additionally allurement the FBI to investigate these claims?

KAVANAUGH: Senator, I’ll do whatever the board wants. I capital a audition the day afterwards the accusation came up. I capital to be actuality that day. Instead, 10 canicule anesthetized above all this is advancing out, you know, that I’m in gangs, I’m on boats in Rhode Island, I’m in Colorado, you know, I’m sighted (ph) all over the place. And these things are printed and run, breathlessly (ph) by cable news.

You know, I capital a audition the aing day. I — my family’s been destroyed by this, senator, destroyed.

FEINSTEIN: And — and I’m — and I’m actual (ph)…

KAVANAUGH: And — and whoever wants — you apperceive whatever the board decides, you know, I’m — I’m — I’m all in.

FEINSTEIN: … But the catechism is…

KAVANAUGH: Immediately. I’m all in immediately.

FEINSTEIN: … No (ph). And the abhorrent and adamantine allotment of this is aback we get an allegation, we’re not in a position to prove it or belie it; therefore, we acquire to depend on some alfresco ascendancy for it. And it would aloof accept to me, then, aback these allegations came forward, that you would appetite the FBI to investigate those claims and ablaze it up already and for all.

KAVANAUGH: Senator, the board investigates. It’s not for me to — to say how to do it. But aloof so you know, the FBI doesn’t adeptness a conclusion. They would accord you a brace 302s that aloof acquaint you what we said.

So I’m here. I capital to be actuality — I capital to be actuality the aing day. It’s an — it’s an corruption that I was not accustomed to arise and anon avert my name, and say I didn’t do this, and accord you all this evidence. I’m not akin — I’m not akin in D.C. on the weekends in the summer of 1982.

This happened on a weekday? Well, is (ph) it — aback — aback I’m not at a Blair Aerial Academy for a summer alliance game, I’m not at Tobin’s abode alive out, I’m not at a cine with Suzanne? You know, I capital to be actuality adapted away.

FEINSTEIN: Well, the difficult affair is that it — the — these hearings are set and — set by the majority. But I’m talking about accepting the affirmation and accepting the affirmation looked at. And I don’t acquire — you know, we apprehend from the witnesses. But the FBI isn’t interviewing them and isn’t giving us any facts. So all we have…

KAVANAUGH: You’re interviewing me.

FEINSTEIN: … is what they say.

KAVANAUGH: You’re interviewing me. You’re — you’re accomplishing it, senator. I’m apologetic to interrupt…

FEINSTEIN: Well…

KAVANAUGH: … but you’re accomplishing it. That’s — the — the — there’s no abstracts reached.

FEINSTEIN: … And — and what you’re saying, if — if I acquire it, is that the allegations by Dr. Ford, Ms. Ramirez and Ms. Swetnick are — are wrong?

KAVANAUGH: Yes, that — that is absolutely what I’m saying; emphatically. The Swetnick affair is a joke. That is a farce.

FEINSTEIN: Would you like to say added about it?

KAVANAUGH: No.

FEINSTEIN: OK.

(LAUGHTER)

FEINSTEIN: OK. That’s it. Acknowledge you, Mr. Chairman.

GRASSLEY: OK. Ms. Mitchell.

MITCHELL: Dr. Ford has declared you as actuality bagged at a party. Did you absorb booze during your aerial academy years?

KAVANAUGH: Yes, we drank beer. My accompany and I, the boys and girls. Yes, we drank beer. I admired beer. Still like beer. We drank beer. The bubbler age, as I noted, was 18, so the seniors were legal, chief year in aerial school, bodies were accustomed to drink, and we — yeah, we drank beer, and I said sometimes — sometimes allegedly had too abounding beers, and sometimes added bodies had too abounding beers.

MITCHELL: What do you…

KAVANAUGH: We drank beer. We admired beer.

MITCHELL: What do you accede to be too abounding beers?

KAVANAUGH: I don’t know. You know, we — whatever the blueprint says, a blood-alcohol chart.

MITCHELL: Aback you talked to Fox Annual the added night, you said that there were times in aerial academy aback bodies adeptness acquire had too abounding beers on occasion. Does that board you?

KAVANAUGH: Sure.

MITCHELL: OK. Acquire you anytime anesthetized out from drinking?

KAVANAUGH: I — anesthetized out would be — no, but I’ve gone to sleep, but — but I’ve never blacked out. That’s the — that’s the — the allegation, and that — that — that’s wrong.

MITCHELL: So let’s allocution about your time in aerial school. In aerial school, afterwards drinking, did you anytime deathwatch up in a adapted above than you remembered casual out or activity to sleep?

KAVANAUGH: No, no.

MITCHELL: Did you anytime deathwatch up with your clothes in a adapted condition, or beneath clothes on than you remembered aback you went to beddy-bye or anesthetized out?

KAVANAUGH: No, no.

MITCHELL: Did you anytime acquaint — did anyone anytime acquaint you about commodity that happened in your appearance that you didn’t bethink during a time that you had been drinking?

KAVANAUGH: No, the — the — we drank beer, and you know, so — so did, I think, the all-inclusive majority of — of bodies our age at the time. But in any event, we drank beer, and — and still do. So whatever, you know.

MITCHELL: During the time in aerial academy aback you would be drinking, did anyone anytime acquaint you about commodity that you did not remember?

KAVANAUGH: No.

MITCHELL: Dr. Ford declared a baby acquisition of bodies at a burghal Maryland home in the summer of 1982. She said that Mark Judge, P.J. Smyth and Leland Ingham additionally were present, as able-bodied as an alien male, and that the bodies were bubbler to capricious degrees. Were you anytime at a acquisition that fits that description?

KAVANAUGH: No, as I’ve said in my aperture statements — aperture statement.

MITCHELL: Dr. Ford declared an adventure above she was abandoned in a allowance with you and Mark Judge. Acquire you anytime been abandoned in a allowance with Dr. Ford and Mark Judge?

KAVANAUGH: No.

MITCHELL: Dr. Ford declared an adventure above you were acid your genitals on her. Acquire you anytime arena or rubbed your genitals adjoin Dr. Ford?

KAVANAUGH: No.

MITCHELL: Dr. Ford declared an adventure above you covered her aperture with your hand. Acquire you anytime covered Dr. Ford’s aperture with your hand?

KAVANAUGH: No.

MITCHELL: Dr. Ford declared an adventure above you accustomed to aish her clothes. Acquire you anytime accustomed to aish her clothes?

KAVANAUGH: No.

MITCHELL: Apropos aback to the ogue of animal behavior that I acquire accustomed you, acquire you ever, at any time, affianced in animal behavior with Dr. Ford?

KAVANAUGH: No.

MITCHELL: Acquire you anytime affianced in animal behavior with Dr. Ford, akin if it was consensual?

KAVANAUGH: No.

MITCHELL: I appetite to allocution about your calendars. You submitted to the board copies of the handwritten calendars that you’ve talked about for the months of May, June, July and August of 1982. Do you acquire them in advanced of you?

KAVANAUGH: I do.

MITCHELL: Did you actualize these calendars, in the adroitness of all the autography that’s on them?

KAVANAUGH: Yes.

MITCHELL: OK. Is it abandoned your handwriting?

KAVANAUGH: Yes.

MITCHELL: Aback did you accomplish these entries?

KAVANAUGH: In nine — in 1982.

MITCHELL: Has annihilation afflicted — been afflicted for those aback 1982?

KAVANAUGH: No.

MITCHELL: Do these calendars represent your affairs for anniversary day, or do they certificate — in added words, prospectively, or do they certificate what absolutely occurred, added like a diary?

KAVANAUGH: They’re both advanced and backward-looking, as you can acquaint by attractive at them, because I cantankerous out assertive doctor’s accessories that didn’t happen, or one night above I was declared to lift weights, I above that out, because it — I acutely didn’t accomplish it that night. So you can see things that I didn’t do above out in retrospect, and also, aback I annual the specific bodies who I was with, that is acceptable backward-looking.

MITCHELL: You explain that you kept these calendars because your ancestor started befitting them in 1978, I acquire you said. That’s why you kept them. In added words, you wrote on them. But why did you accumulate them up until this time?

KAVANAUGH: Able-bodied — well, he’s kept them, too, aback 1978, so he’s a acceptable role model.

GRASSLEY: Ms. Mitchell, you’ll acquire to stop.

MITCHELL: Oh, I’m sorry.

GRASSLEY: Adjudicator Kavanaugh has asked for a break, so we’ll booty a 15-minute break.

(RECESS)

GRASSLEY: Aloof cat-and-mouse for you, Diane.

FEINSTEIN: Sorry.

GRASSLEY: Don’t — don’t apologize, you…

(CROSSTALK)

GRASSLEY: Abettor Leahy?

LEAHY: Acknowledge you, Mr. Chairman.

Judge, you said before, and afresh today, that Mark Adjudicator was a aing acquaintance of castigation in aerial school. Now Dr. Ford, as you know, has said that he was in the allowance aback she was attacked. She additionally says you were, too.

Unfortunate (ph) that (ph) the FBI has never interviewed him. We adeptness (ph) be able to acquire his appearance here. The administrator refuses to alarm him.

If she’s adage Mark Adjudicator was in the allowance then, afresh he should be in the allowance actuality today. Would you appetite him declared as a witness?

KAVANAUGH: Senator, this accusation came into the committee…

LEAHY: No, I’m aloof allurement the question. Would you appetite him to be actuality as a witness?

KAVANAUGH: He’s — he’s already provided affidavit affidavit to the committee. This allegation’s been hidden by the committee…

LEAHY: Now, able-bodied (ph)…

(CROSSTALK)

KAVANAUGH: … by — by associates of the…

LEAHY: … it hasn’t been — it has not been brash by the FBI. The board has banned to acquiesce it to be.

KAVANAUGH: It was abandoned on (ph)…

(CROSSTALK)

KAVANAUGH: … it was sprung.

LEAHY: It was not brash by the FBI, and he has not been declared above he adeptness be beneath oath.

KAVANAUGH: Should acquire been handled in the due course, Senator.

(CROSSTALK)

KAVANAUGH: Aback he came in.

LEAHY: I would — I would disagree with that. I’ve been on this board 44 years, both Republicans and Democrats. I’ve never aboveboard somebody that ytical and not accustomed to be actuality to — declared to be testified or on (ph) FBI background.

But let me ask…

(CROSSTALK)

KAVANAUGH: You see (ph) he’s provided affidavit affidavit and the…

LEAHY: He has — he has not…

KAVANAUGH: … Abettor — Senator, let me — let me finish. He — the — the accusation came in weeks ago and annihilation was done with it by the baronial member.

And afresh it’s sprung on me…

LEAHY: Adjudicator Kavanaugh, I’ve heard your — your band (ph) and you accompaniment it over and over again. And I acquire that able-bodied in mind. But let me ask you this. He authored a book titled, “Wasted: Tales of a Genx Drunk.” He references a Barthold (ph) Kavanaugh airsickness on someone’s car during Bank Anniversary and afresh casual out. Is that you that he’s talking about?

KAVANAUGH: Senator, Mark Adjudicator was…

LEAHY: To your knowledge, is that you that he’s talking about?

KAVANAUGH: I’ll explain it if you let me.

LEAHY: Proceed, please.

KAVANAUGH: Mark Adjudicator was a acquaintance of ours in aerial academy who developed a actual austere bubbler problem, an addiction botheration that lasted decades and was actual difficult for him to escape from.

And he about died. And afresh developed — afresh he had leukemia as well, on top of it.

Now, as allotment of his assay — or allotment of his advancing to grips with sobriety, he wrote a book that is a fictionalized book and an account….

(CROSSTALK)

KAVANAUGH: I advanced he best out names of accompany of ours to bandy them in as affectionate of aing to what — for characters in the book. So, you know, we can sit here…

LEAHY: So you don’t apperceive — you don’t apperceive whether that’s you or not?

KAVANAUGH: … we can sit actuality and you (ph) like (ph), accomplish — accomplish fun of some guy who has an addiction.

LEAHY: I’m not making…

(CROSSTALK)

KAVANAUGH: I don’t advanced that absolutely makes — is absolutely good…

LEAHY: … Adjudicator Kavanaugh, I’m aggravating to get a beeline acknowledgment from you beneath oath. Are you Bart (ph) Kavanaugh that he’s apropos to, yes or no? That’s it (ph)…

KAVANAUGH: You’d acquire to ask him.

LEAHY: Well, I accede with you there. And that’s why I ambition that the administrator had him actuality beneath oath.

Now, you’ve talked about your yearbook. In your yearbook, you talked about bubbler and animal exploits, did you not?

KAVANAUGH: Senator, let me — let me booty a footfall aback and explain aerial school. I was cardinal one in the class…

LEAHY: And I — and I anticipation (ph)…

KAVANAUGH: … apprentice — no, no, no, no, no.

LEAHY: I anticipation we were in the Senate (ph)…

KAVANAUGH: You’ve got this all — I’m activity to — I’m activity to allocution about my aerial school…

LEAHY: … the (ph) accomplished (ph) catechism (ph).

I anticipation we were in the Senate (ph) adjournment (ph).

KAVANAUGH: … no, no.

GRASSLEY: Let him answer.

KAVANAUGH: I’m activity to allocution about my aerial academy record, if you’re activity to sit actuality and apish me.

GRASSLEY: We — we were — I advanced we were all actual fair to Dr. Ford. Shouldn’t we be aloof as fair to Adjudicator Kavanaugh?

(CROSSTALK)

KAVANAUGH: I bankrupt my abject in academics. I consistently accustomed to do the best I could. As I recall, I accomplished one in the class, aboriginal in — you know, apprentice and inferior year, adapted at the top with Steve (ph) Clark (ph) and Eddie (ph) (inaudible), we were consistently affectionate of in the mix.

I — I played sports. I was captain of the varsity basketball team. I was advanced receiver and arresting aback on the football team. I ran clue in the bounce of ’82 to try to get faster. I did my annual projects at the school, which complex activity to the soup kitchen city — let me accomplishment — and activity to babysitter intellectually disabled kids at the Rockville Library.

With the abbey — and, yes, we got calm with our friends.

LEAHY: Does this reflect what you are? Does this annual reflect your…

KAVANAUGH: I…

LEAHY: … focus on academics and your annual for women? That’s easy. Yes or no. You don’t acquire to adjournment the answer. Does it reflect your focus on academics…

(CROSSTALK)

KAVANAUGH: I already said the annual — in my aperture statement. The yearbook, obviously…

GRASSLEY: Judge? Aloof adjournment a minute. He’s asked the question. I’ll accord you time to acknowledgment it.

KAVANAUGH: The — the yearbook, as I said in my aperture statement, was commodity above the acceptance and editors fabricated a accommodation to amusement some of it as applesauce and some of as exaggeration, some of it adulatory things that don’t reflect the things that were absolutely the axial allotment of our school.

Yes, we went to parties, though. Yes, of course, we went to parties and the annual folio describes that and affectionate of makes fun of it. And as a — you know, if we appetite to sit actuality and allocution about whether a Supreme Cloister best should be based on a aerial academy annual page, I advanced that’s taken us to a new akin of absurdity.

LEAHY: Ms. Mitchell? Well, we got a adjournment but not a distinct answer.

GRASSLEY: Ms. Mitchell?

MITCHELL: Judge, do you still acquire your calendar — calendars there?

KAVANAUGH: I do.

MITCHELL: I would like you to accessory at the July 1st entry.

KAVANAUGH: Yes.

MITCHELL: The admission says — and I adduce — “Go to Timmy’s (ph) for skis (ph) with Adjudicator (ph), Tom (ph), P.J. (ph), Bernie (ph) and Squee (ph)”?

KAVANAUGH: Squee. That’s a nick…

MITCHELL: What does…

KAVANAUGH: … that’s a nickname.

MITCHELL: OK. To what does this refer, and to whom?

KAVANAUGH: So first, says “Tobin’s (ph) abode workout”. So that’s one of the football workouts that we would acquire — that Dr. (inaudible) would run for guys on the football aggregation during the summer.

So we would be there — that’s usually 6:00 to 8:00 or so, affectionate of — until a dark. And afresh it looks like we went over to Timmy’s — you appetite to apperceive their aftermost names too? I’m blessed to do it.

MITCHELL: If you could aloof identify, is — is “Judge,” Mark Judge?

KAVANAUGH: It is.

MITCHELL: And is “P.J.,” P.J. Smith?

KAVANAUGH: It is.

So — all right. It’s Tim Gaudette (ph), Mark Judge, Tom Caine (ph), P.J. Smith, Bernie McCarthy (ph), Chris Garrett (ph).

MITCHELL: Chris Garrett is Squee?

KAVANAUGH: He is.

MITCHELL: Did you in your calendar commonly certificate amusing gatherings like abode parties or gatherings of accompany in your calendar?

KAVANAUGH: Yes. It — it absolutely appears that way, that’s what I was accomplishing in the summer of 1982. And you can see that reflected on several of the — several of the entries.

MITCHELL: If a acquisition like Dr. Ford has declared had occurred, would you acquire accurate that?

KAVANAUGH: Yes, because I accurate aggregate of those kinds of events, akin baby get-togethers. August 7th is accession acceptable archetype above I accurate a baby accumulation that summer, so yes.

MITCHELL: August 7th. Could you apprehend that?

KAVANAUGH: I advanced that’s go to Becky’s, Matt, Denise, Lori, Jenny (ph).

MITCHELL: Acquire you brash every admission that is in these calendars of May, June, July and August of 1982?

KAVANAUGH: I have.

MITCHELL: Is there annihilation that could akin accidentally fit what we’re talking about, in agreement of Dr. Ford’s allegations?

KAVANAUGH: No.

MITCHELL: As a apostle and a judge, are you — we’ve talked about the FBI. Are you acquainted that this blazon of breach would absolutely be brash by bounded police?

KAVANAUGH: Yes, I mentioned Montgomery County Badge earlier. Yes.

MITCHELL: OK. Are you acquainted that in Maryland, there is no statute of limitations that would prohibit you actuality charged, akin if this happened in 1982?

KAVANAUGH: That’s my understanding.

MITCHELL: Acquire you, at any time, been contacted by any associates of bounded badge agencies apropos this matter?

KAVANAUGH: No, ma’am.

MITCHELL: Above-mentioned to your best for Supreme Court, you’ve talked about all of the changeable clerks you’ve had, and the women that you’ve formed with. I’m not aloof talking about them; I’m talking about globally. Acquire you anytime been accused, either formally or informally, of exceptionable animal behavior?

KAVANAUGH: No.

MITCHELL: And aback I say informally, I beggarly aloof a — a changeable complains. It doesn’t acquire to be to anybody abroad but you.

KAVANAUGH: No.

MITCHELL: Aback Dr. Ford’s accusation was fabricated public, how abounding times acquire you been interviewed by the committee?

KAVANAUGH: It’s — it’s been a — three or four. I’m — I’m aggravating to bethink now. It’s — it’s been several times. Anniversary of these new things, cool as they are, we’d get on the buzz and affectionate of go through them.

MITCHELL: So acquire you submitted to interviews accurately about Dr. Ford’s allegation?

KAVANAUGH: Yes.

MITCHELL: And what about Deborah Ramirez’s allegation…

KAVANAUGH: Yes.

MITCHELL: … that you coiled your penis in advanced of her?

KAVANAUGH: Yes.

MITCHELL: What about Julie Swetnick’s accusation that you afresh affianced in drugging and gang-raping, or acceptance women to be gang-raped?

KAVANAUGH: Yes. Yes, I’ve been interviewed about it.

MITCHELL: Were your answers to my questions today connected with the answers that you gave to the board in these assorted interviews?

KAVANAUGH: Yes, ma’am.

MITCHELL: OK. I see I’m out of time.

GRASSLEY: Abettor Durbin?

DURBIN: Acknowledge you, Mr. Chairman.

Judge Kavanaugh, beforehand today, Dr. Christine Ford sat in that aforementioned chair, and beneath oath, she said acutely and absolutely that she was a victim of animal beforehand at your hands. She answered our questions directly, and she didn’t avoid at the anticipation of appointment herself to an FBI assay of these charges. We know, and I’m abiding she’s been brash by her attorneys, that a actuality lying to the FBI can face bent prosecution.

You acquire acutely and absolutely denied that you assaulted Dr. Ford. With that statement, you accusation acquire that there is no aboveboard affirmation or any aboveboard attestant that could prove otherwise.

You started off with an animated annual at the beginning, and I can imagine, try to brainstorm what you acquire been through, and your family’s been through, and I’m abiding I wouldn’t get aing to it. But it was an impassioned…

(UNKNOWN): OK. I’m abiding you wouldn’t.

DURBIN: I’m abiding I wouldn’t. It’s an animated statement. And in the beforehand of it, you said, “I acceptable any affectionate of investigation.” I adduce you. I acceptable any affectionate of investigation. I’ve got a advancement for you: adapted now, about-face to your larboard in the advanced row to Don McGahn, admonition to Admiral Donald Trump. Ask him to append this audition and best activity until the FBI completes its assay of the allege fabricated by Dr. Ford and others, and goes to accompany the assemblage forward, and provides that admonition to this hearing. I am abiding that the administrator at that point will acquire that that is a reasonable appeal to assuredly put to blow these charges, if they are false, or to prove them if they are not.

You spent two years in the White Abode arrangement that accustomed authoritative nominees. You affronted to the FBI over, and over, and over afresh for their work. Let’s accompany them in actuality and now. About-face to Don McGahn, and acquaint him it’s time to get this done. An FBI assay is the abandoned way to acknowledgment some of these questions.

(UNKNOWN): Senator…

GRASSLEY: Stop the — stop the clock.

This board is — is active this hearing, not the White House, not Don McGahn, not akin you as a nominee. We’re — we are actuality today because Dr. Ford asked for an befalling to hear. I apperceive you did too, as well, in fact, maybe akin afore she did.

We’re actuality because bodies capital to be heard from allege that they all anticipation were unfair, or activities like animal beforehand was unfair. So I appetite to assure Abettor Durbin, behindhand of what you say to Abettor Don McGahn, we’re not suspending this hearing.

Proceed to acknowledgment the question, or so whatever — or to — if the gentleman…

DURBIN: I — I’ll aloof say this: If you, Adjudicator Kavanaugh, affronted to Don McGahn and to this board and say, “For the annual of my reputation, my ancestors name, and to get to the basal of the accurateness of this, I am not activity to breach — be an obstacle to an FBI investigation,” I would accomplishment that all the associates of the board would accompany me in saying, “We’re activity to accept by your witch — wishes, and we will acquire that investigation.”

KAVANAUGH: I — I acceptable whatever the board wants to do, because I’m cogent the truth.

DURBIN: I appetite to apperceive what you appetite to do.

KAVANAUGH: I — I’m cogent the truth.

DURBIN: I appetite to apperceive what you appetite to do, Judge.

KAVANAUGH: I’m innocent. I’m innocent of this charge.

DURBIN: Afresh you’re able for an FBI investigator…

KAVANAUGH: They don’t adeptness conclusions. You adeptness the conclusion, Senator.

DURBIN: No, but they do investigate questions.

KAVANAUGH: I’m — I’m innocent.

DURBIN: And you can’t acquire it both ways, Judge. You can’t say actuality at the beginning…

KAVANAUGH: I capital a hearing.

DURBIN: (inaudible) your moment.

KAVANAUGH: Look, this thing…

DURBIN: I acceptable any affectionate of investigation, and afresh airing abroad from this.

KAVANAUGH: This affair was sprung on me — this affair was sprung at the aftermost minute afterwards actuality captivated by staff. You know…

DURBIN: Judge, if there is no accurateness to…

KAVANAUGH: And I declared for a — I declared for a audition immediately.

DURBIN: If there is no accurateness to her charges, the FBI assay will appearance that. Are you abashed that they adeptness not?

GRASSLEY: Arise on. Gee, whiz.

KAVANAUGH: The FBI does not adeptness — you know. You apperceive this is — you apperceive that’s a affected question…

DURBIN: Well, here…

KAVANAUGH: … because the FBI doesn’t adeptness conclusions.

DURBIN: So let’s — let’s just…

KAVANAUGH: They aloof board the 302s. 302s, so I can explain to bodies who don’t apperceive what that is, they aloof activity and do what you’re doing: ask questions and afresh blazon up a report. They don’t adeptness the basal band conclusion. You…

DURBIN: This morning — this morning, I asked Dr. Ford, I asked her about this adventure above she ran into Mark Adjudicator in Safeway, and she said, “Sure, I bethink it.” Six or eight weeks afterwards this occurrence.

Well, accession at The Washington Post went in and took a accessory at Mr. Judge’s book and has been able to — the one that he wrote about his addiction and his alcoholism — and they acquire narrowed it down, what they advanced was a aeon of time six or eight weeks afterwards the event. And he would acquire been alive at the Safeway at that point.

So the point I’m accepting to is we at atomic can affix some dots actuality and get some information. Why would you accept that kind…

KAVANAUGH: Here’s some (ph) dots.

DURBIN: … of investigation? Why would you accept that affectionate of investigation?

KAVANAUGH: Senator, I — I acceptable — I capital the audition aftermost week.

DURBIN: I’m allurement about the FBI investigation.

KAVANAUGH: They’re — the board abstracts out how to ask the questions, I’ll do whatever. I’ve been on the buzz assorted times with board counsel. I’ll allocution to…

DURBIN: Adjudicator Kavanaugh, will you abutment an FBI investigation…

KAVANAUGH: … I’ll do — I’ll…

DURBIN: … adapted now?

KAVANAUGH: … I — I will do whatever the board wants to…

DURBIN: Personally, do you advanced that’s the best affair for us to do? You won’t answer?

KAVANAUGH: … Look, senator, I — I’ve — I’ve — I’ve said I capital a audition and I’d said I was acceptable (ph) anything. I’m innocent. This affair was captivated — captivated aback it could acquire been presented in the accustomed way. It could acquire been captivated and handled confidentially at first, which was what Dr. Ford’s wishes were as I acquire it. It wouldn’t acquire acquired this — like, destroyed my ancestors like this — this accomplishment has.

DURBIN: I advanced an FBI assay will admonition all of us on both abandon of the issue.

GRASSLEY: Abettor Graham asked for the floor. But afore he does, it seems to me that if you appetite to apperceive something, you’ve got the attestant adapted actuality to — to ask him. And secondly, if you appetite an FBI report, you can ask for it yourself. I’ve asked for FBI belletrist in the past, in the 38 years I’ve been in the Senate.

Senator Graham.

GRAHAM: Are you acquainted that at 9:23 on the night of July the 9th, the day you were nominated to the Supreme Cloister by Admiral Trump, Abettor Schumer said 23-minutes afterwards your nomination, “I will altercate Adjudicator Kavanaugh’s best with aggregate I have, I acquire (sic) a bipartisan — and I accomplishment a bipartisan majority will do the same. The stakes are artlessly too aerial for annihilation less.” Well, if you weren’t acquainted of it, you are now.

Did you accommodated with Abettor Dianne Feinstein on August 20th?

KAVANAUGH: I did accommodated with Abettor Feinstein…

GRAHAM: Did you apperceive that her agents had already recommended a apostle to Dr. Ford?

KAVANAUGH: … I did not apperceive that.

GRAHAM: Did you apperceive that her and her agents had this — allegations for over 20 days?

KAVANAUGH: I did not apperceive that at the time.

GRAHAM: If you capital a FBI investigation, you could acquire arise to us. What you appetite to do is abort this guy’s life, ascendancy this bank accessible and accomplishment you win in 2020. You’ve said that, not me. You’ve got annihilation to apologize for.

When you see Sotomayor and Kagan, acquaint them that Lindsey said accost because I voted for them. I would never do to them what you’ve done to this guy. This is the best bent adulterated aback I’ve been in politics. And if you absolutely capital to apperceive the truth, you abiding as hell wouldn’t acquire done what you’ve done to this guy.

Are you a assemblage rapist?

KAVANAUGH: No.

GRAHAM: I cannot brainstorm what you and your ancestors acquire gone through.

Boy, you all appetite power. God, I accomplishment you never get it. I accomplishment the American bodies can see through this sham. That you knew about it and you captivated it. You had no ambition of absorption Dr. Ford; none.

She’s as abundant of a victim as you are. God, I abhorrence to say it because these acquire been my friends. But let me acquaint you, aback it comes to this, you’re attractive for a fair process? You came to the amiss boondocks at the amiss time, my friend. Do you accede this a job interview?

KAVANAUGH: If (ph) the admonition and accord role is like a job interview.

GRAHAM: Do you accede that you’ve been through a job interview?

KAVANAUGH: I’ve been through a activity of admonition and accord beneath the Constitution, which…

GRAHAM: Would you say you’ve been through hell?

KAVANAUGH: I — I’ve been through hell and afresh some.

GRAHAM: This is not a job interview.

KAVANAUGH: Yes.

GRAHAM: This is hell.

KAVANAUGH: This — this…

GRAHAM: This is activity to abort the adeptness of acceptable bodies to arise advanced because of this crap. Your aerial academy annual — you acquire interacted with able women all your life, not one accusation.

You’re declared to be Bill Cosby aback you’re a inferior and chief in aerial school. And all of a sudden, you got over it. It’s been my compassionate that if you biologic women and abduction them for two years in aerial school, you allegedly don’t stop.

Here’s my understanding, if you lived a acceptable activity bodies would admit it, like the American Bar Affiliation has, the gold standard. His artlessness is absolutely unquestioned. He is the actual alert in his claimed conduct, harbors no biases or prejudices. He’s absolutely ethical, is a absolutely appropriate person. He is warm, friendly, unassuming. He’s the nicest actuality — the ABA.

The one affair I can acquaint you should be appreciative of — Ashley, you should be appreciative of this — that you aloft a babe who had the acceptable appearance to adjure for Dr. Ford.

To my Republican colleagues, if you vote no, you’re legitimizing the best abject affair I acquire aboveboard in my time in politics. You appetite this seat? I accomplishment you never get it.

I accomplishment you’re on the Supreme Court, that’s absolutely above you should be. And I accomplishment that the American bodies will see through this charade. And I ambition you well. And I intend to vote for you and I accomplishment everybody who’s candid will.

GRASSLEY: Abettor Whitehouse.

WHITEHOUSE: Should we let things achieve a little bit afterwards that?

GRASSLEY: If you appetite to — we’ll booty a 60-second break.

WHITEHOUSE: No, I’m good.

GRASSLEY: OK. Go ahead.

WHITEHOUSE: I’m good.

One of the reasons, Mr. Kavanaugh, that we are attractive at the annual is that it is about connected in time with the challenge at affair actuality and because it appears to be your words. Is it, in fact, your words on your annual page?

KAVANAUGH: We — we submitted things to the editors and I acquire they took them. I don’t apperceive if they afflicted things or not, but.

WHITEHOUSE: You’re not acquainted of any changes? As far as you know…

KAVANAUGH: I don’t — I’m not acquainted one way…

WHITEHOUSE: … these are your words?

KAVANAUGH: … I’m not acquainted one way or the other, but I’m not activity to sit actuality and challenge that. Acquire at it, if you appetite to go through my yearbook.

WHITEHOUSE: Yes, I’m — I’m absolutely interested. You know, attorneys should be alive off of accustomed agreement and acquire the words that we’re using. I advanced that’s a appealing basal assumption amid lawyers, wouldn’t you agree?

KAVANAUGH: It is. If you’re abashed about my yearbook, acquire at, senator.

WHITEHOUSE: Let’s accessory at, “Beach Anniversary Ralph Club — Biggest Contributor,” what does the chat Ralph beggarly in that?

KAVANAUGH: That allegedly refers to throwing up. I’m accustomed to acquire a anemic abdomen and I consistently have. In fact, the aftermost time I was here, you asked me about accepting ketchup on spaghetti. I consistently acquire had a anemic stomach.

DURBIN: I don’t apperceive that I asked about ketchup on spaghetti, but…

KAVANAUGH: You — you didn’t, accession did. And…

WHITEHOUSE: OK.

KAVANAUGH: … this is well-known. Anyone who’s accustomed me, like a lot of these bodies abaft me — accustomed me my accomplished activity — know, you know. I got a anemic stomach, whether it’s with beer or with ambrosial aliment or anything.

WHITEHOUSE: So the airsickness that you advertence in the Ralph Club reference, accompanying to the burning of alcohol?

KAVANAUGH: Senator, I was at the top of my chic academically, bankrupt my abject in school. Captain of the varsity basketball team. Got in Yale College. Aback I got into Yale College, got into Yale Law School. Formed my appendage off.

WHITEHOUSE: And did the apple “ralph” you acclimated in your yearbook…

(CROSSTALK)

KAVANAUGH: I already — I already answered…

WHITEHOUSE: … accredit (ph) to alcohol?

KAVANAUGH: … the question. If you’re…

WHITEHOUSE: Did it chronicle to alcohol? You haven’t answered that.

KAVANAUGH: I like beer. I like beer. I don’t apperceive if you do…

WHITEHOUSE: OK.

KAVANAUGH: … do you like beer, Senator, or not?

WHITEHOUSE: Um, next…

KAVANAUGH: What do you like to drink?

WHITEHOUSE: Aing one is…

KAVANAUGH: Senator, what do you like to drink?

WHITEHOUSE: … Judge, acquire you — I don’t apperceive if it’s “boufed” or “boofed” — how do you accent that?

KAVANAUGH: That refers to flatulence. We were 16.

(LAUGHTER)

WHITEHOUSE: OK. And so aback your acquaintance Mark Adjudicator said the aforementioned — put the aforementioned affair in his annual folio aback to you, he had the aforementioned meaning? It was flatulence?

KAVANAUGH: I don’t apperceive what he did, but that’s my recollection. We appetite to allocution about flatulence at age 16 on a annual page, I’m — I’m game.

WHITEHOUSE: You mentioned, I think, the Renate or Renata — I don’t apperceive how you accent that — that’s a able name of an abandoned you know?

KAVANAUGH: Renata.

WHITEHOUSE: Renata. It’s spelled with an “E” at the end, R-E-N-A-T-E. Is that…

KAVANAUGH: Correct.

WHITEHOUSE: OK. And afresh afterwards that is the chat “alumnius.” What does the chat “alumnius” beggarly in that context?

KAVANAUGH: I explained that in my aperture statement. We — she was a abundant acquaintance of ours. We — a agglomeration of us went to dances with her. She abashed out with us as a group. The media bazaar that has been generated by this, anticipation (ph) and arise that it referred to sex. It did not. Never had any — as she herself said on the record, any affectionate of animal alternation with her.

And I’m sorry, how that’s been misinterpreted and apologetic about that, as I explained in my aperture statement. Because she’s a acceptable person. And to acquire her declared abject through this audition is a joke. And, really, an embarrassment.

WHITEHOUSE: Devil’s triangle?

KAVANAUGH: Bubbler game.

WHITEHOUSE: How’s it played?

KAVANAUGH: Three glasses in a triangle.

WHITEHOUSE: And?

KAVANAUGH: You anytime played quarters?

WHITEHOUSE: No (ph).

KAVANAUGH: OK. It’s a abode game.

WHITEHOUSE: Anne Dougherty’s?

KAVANAUGH: As you can acquaint from my calendar, she had a affair on the Fourth of July in the bank in Delaware.

WHITEHOUSE: And there are, like, one, two, three, four, five, six, seven F’s in advanced of the Fourth of July. What does that signify, if anything?

KAVANAUGH: One of our friends, Squi, aback he said the F chat starting at a adolescent age, had affectionate of a cleanup to the F word. Affectionate of a “ffff.”

(LAUGHTER)

And afresh the chat would arise out. And aback we were 15, we anticipation that was funny. And it became an axial antic for the — how he would say, “Ffff” — and I won’t echo it here. For the F word.

WHITEHOUSE: Apropos to Georgetown adjoin Louisville and…

KAVANAUGH: you appetite — you appetite any added on the Fs?

WHITEHOUSE: No. Orioles adjoin Red Sox. And both, you respond, “Who won anyway?” Or “Who won that d anyway?” Should we draw any cessation that a accident of bond associated with booze was complex in you not alive who won the amateur that you attended?

KAVANAUGH: No. Aboriginal of all, the Georgetown-Louisville was watching it on TV, a party. And the…

WHITEHOUSE: That’s not inconsistent with bubbler and not canonizing what happened.

KAVANAUGH: I’m aware. And the point of both was, we in aspect were accepting a affair and didn’t pay absorption to the d akin admitting the d was the alibi we had for accepting together.

I advanced that’s actual common. I don’t apperceive if you’ve been to a Super Bowl affair for example, Senator, and not paid absorption to the d and aloof abashed out with your friends. I don’t apperceive if you’ve done that or not. But that’s what we were apropos to in those — those two occasions.

GRASSLEY: Abettor Cornyn?

CORNYN: Judge, I can’t advanced of a added awkward aspersion for the United States Senate aback the McCarthy hearings.

When the animadversion was about the animality of the activity adjoin the bodies involved, and the catechism was asked: Acquire you no adroitness of decency?

And I’m abashed we’ve absent that, at atomic for the time being. Do you acquire you’ve been accused of assorted crimes?

KAVANAUGH: I’m — I’m acutely aware, for my ancestors and me to apprehend about this asthmatic reporting.

CORNYN: Of course, the — the animal beforehand that Dr. Ford claims that you’ve denied. Afresh the claims of Ms. Ramirez, that not akin The New York Times would abode because it couldn’t approve it.

And afresh Stormy Daniels’ apostle arise a bombshell, accusing you of assemblage rape. All of those are crimes, are they not?

KAVANAUGH: They are. And I’m — I’m never activity to get my acceptability back. It’s — it — my activity is absolutely and assuredly altered.

CORNYN: Able-bodied Adjudicator — Judge, don’t accord up.

KAVANAUGH: I’m not giving up. I…

CORNYN: The American — the American bodies — the American bodies are alert to this, and they will accomplish their accommodation and I advanced you’ll arise out on the adapted ancillary of that decision.

KAVANAUGH: Well, I will consistently be a acceptable actuality and try to be a acceptable judge, whatever happens. But…

CORNYN: So this is not a job interview. You’ve been accused of a crime. If you acquire aria to the board and the investigators, that is a abomination in and of itself, correct?

KAVANAUGH: That is correct.

CORNYN: So in adjustment to vote adjoin your nomination, we would acquire to achieve that you are a consecutive liar.

KAVANAUGH: Yeah.

CORNYN: And you will acquire aboveboard yourself to accustomed accident in the way — in your alternation with this board and the investigators, isn’t that correct?

KAVANAUGH: That’s — that’s my understanding.

CORNYN: You talked in your annual on — with Martha MacCallum the added night about a fair process. Some of my colleagues above the alley say, “Well, the accountability is not on the accuser because this is a job interview,” the accountability is on you.

But you said you weren’t there and it didn’t happen. It’s cool for you to prove a negative. So I would aloof advance that you acquire been accused of a abomination and that a fair process, beneath the United States Constitution, beneath our angle of fair play, bureau that the bodies who accomplish an accusation adjoin you acquire to arise advanced with some evidence.

Isn’t that allotment of a fair process?

KAVANAUGH: Yes, sir, Senator.

CORNYN: And allotment of that bureau that if you’re activity to accomplish an allegation, there needs to be corroboration. In added words, you’re not accusable because somebody makes an accusation adjoin you in this country. We’re not a badge state. We don’t accord the government that affectionate of power.

We assert that those allege be accurate by competent evidence. And I apperceive we’re not in a court. I’ve told my colleagues, if we were in court, bisected of them would be in antipathy of court.

But you acquire been accused of a crime, and I acquire axiological notions of fair comedy and amends and our built-in arrangement crave that if somebody’s activity to accomplish that accusation adjoin you, afresh they accusation to arise advanced with some corroboration, not aloof allegations.

And you’re adapted to be affronted about the delays in your adeptness to arise actuality and assure your acceptable name, because in the interim, it aloof keeps accepting worse. It’s not Dr. Ford. It this adventure that not akin the New York Times would report, the accusation of Ms. Ramirez. And afresh Stormy Daniels’ apostle comes up with this cool story, accusing you of the best abject and blue conduct. It’s outrageous, and you’re adapted to be angry.

But this is your adventitious to acquaint your story, and I accomplishment you acquire a adventitious to acquaint us aggregate you appetite acquaint us. But the accountability is not on you to belie the allegations made. The accountability beneath our system, aback you allege somebody of bent conduct, is on the actuality authoritative the accusation.

Now, I acquire we’re not — this isn’t a trial, like I said, but I aloof capital to accomplish abiding that we understood. It’s adamantine to reconstruct what happened 36 years ago, and I acknowledge what you said about Dr. Ford, that conceivably she has had an adventure at some point in her life, and you are affectionate to that, and…

But your acceptability is on the line, and I accomplishment bodies acquire the force of the allege fabricated adjoin you, and what a fair activity looks like.

GRASSLEY: Abettor Klobuchar?

KLOBUCHAR: Acknowledge you, Mr. Chairman.

Judge, we’re talking actuality about decency, and — and you understand, we acquire this built-in assignment to admonish and consent. And for me, aback this affirmation came forward, I absitively that I bald to accessory at this, and I bald to acquisition out about it, and I bald to ask you questions about it, as able-bodied as others that were involved.

So again, I’m not activity to booty absolutely the aforementioned admission as my colleagues actuality and allocution about Don McGahn, or any of this. Why don’t you aloof ask the president? Mrs. — Dr. Ford can’t do this. We acutely haven’t been able to do this. But aloof ask the admiral to reopen the FBI investigation.

KAVANAUGH: I advanced the board is accomplishing — you’re accomplishing the investigation. I’m actuality to acknowledgment your questions…

KLOBUCHAR: No.

KAVANAUGH: … and I should say one thing, Abettor Klobuchar, which is I acknowledge our affair together, and I acknowledge how you handled the above-mentioned hearing, and I acquire a lot of annual for you.

KLOBUCHAR: Well, acknowledge you. All of that aside, here’s the thing: you could absolutely aloof get this accessible so that we can allocution to these witnesses, and the FBI can do it instead of us. And you’ve arise afore us, but we acquire bodies like Mark Judge, who Dr. Ford says was a attestant to this. We acquire this polygraph able that my colleagues were adopting issues about the polygraph. We would like to acquire that actuality arise afore us. And I aloof advanced if we could accessible this up…

KAVANAUGH: I don’t beggarly to — I don’t beggarly to interrupt, but I assumption I am. But Mark — Mark Adjudicator has provided affidavit annual adage this didn’t happen, and that I never did or would do…

KLOBUCHAR: But we would like the FBI to be able to hunt up and ask him questions. You know, we talked about accomplished best processes, and you talked those, and I calendar that Admiral George Bush, in the Anita Hill / Amends Thomas case, he opened up the FBI assay and let questions actuality asked, and I advanced it was accessible for people. So was his accommodation reasonable?

KAVANAUGH: I — I don’t apperceive the affairs of that. What I know, Senator, is I’m (inaudible)

KLOBUCHAR: But you — that it — he — he aloof — the affairs are that he opened up the assay so the FBI could ask some questions.

KAVANAUGH: I — I’m…

KLOBUCHAR: That’s what he — he opened up the accomplishments check.

KAVANAUGH: I’m actuality to acknowledgment questions about my yearbook, or about, you know, what I…

KLOBUCHAR: OK, that’s — I…

KAVANAUGH: … my sports, or, you know, summer basketball…

KLOBUCHAR: OK. I’m not activity to ask about the yearbook.

So best bodies acquire done some bubbler in aerial academy and college, and abounding bodies akin attempt with alcoholism and affair drinking. My own dad struggled with alcoholism best of his life, and he got in agitation for it, and there were consequences. He is still in A.A. at age 90, and he’s sober, and in his words, he was pursued by grace, and that’s how he got through this.

So in your case, you acquire said, actuality and added places, that you never drank so abundant that you didn’t bethink what happened. But yet, we acquire heard — not beneath oath, but we acquire heard your academy acquaintance say that you did booze frequently. These are in annual reports. That you would sometimes be belligerent. Accession acquaintance said it’s not aboveboard for you to say you didn’t acquire anamnesis lapses. So bubbler is one thing.

KAVANAUGH: I don’t advanced — I — I absolutely don’t advanced that’s — the added quote’s correct. On the aboriginal quote, if you wanted, I provided some actual that’s still redacted about the bearings with the apprentice year roommate, and I don’t absolutely appetite to echo that in a accessible hearing, but aloof so you know, there were three bodies in a room, Dave White, Jamie Roach (ph) and me, and it was a advancing bearings above Jamie did not like Dave White. I was — at all, and I’m in this…

KLOBUCHAR: OK, I — I just…

KAVANAUGH: So Dave — so Dave White came aback from — from home one weekend, and Jamie Roach had abashed all his furniture…

KLOBUCHAR: OK. OK.

KAVANAUGH: … out into the — out into the courtyard.

KLOBUCHAR: OK.

KAVANAUGH: And so he walks in, and so that’s your antecedent on that, so there’s some old…

KLOBUCHAR: OK, so bubbler is one thing.

KAVANAUGH: There — and there’s abundant more. Accessory at the redacted allocation of what I said. I don’t appetite to echo that in a accessible hearing.

KLOBUCHAR: All right. I will. I will.

KAVANAUGH: (inaudible)

KLOBUCHAR: Could I aloof ask one question?

KAVANAUGH: … redacted admonition about that.

KLOBUCHAR: OK. Bubbler is one thing, but the affair is about truthfulness, and in your accounting testimony, you said sometimes you had too abounding drinks. Was there anytime a time aback you drank so abundant that you couldn’t bethink what happened, or allotment of what happened the night before?

KAVANAUGH: No, I — no. I bethink what happened, and I advanced you’ve allegedly had beers, Senator, and — and so I…

KLOBUCHAR: So you’re adage there’s never been a case above you drank so abundant that you didn’t bethink what happened the night before, or allotment of what happened.

KAVANAUGH: It’s — you’re allurement about, you know, blackout. I don’t know. Acquire you?

KLOBUCHAR: Could you acknowledgment the question, Judge? I aloof — so you — that’s not happened. Is that your answer?

KAVANAUGH: Yeah, and I’m ytical if you have.

KLOBUCHAR: I acquire no bubbler problem, Judge.

KAVANAUGH: Yeah, nor do I.

KLOBUCHAR: OK, acknowledge you.

GRASSLEY: Afore I go to Abettor Hatch, aback this FBI affair keeps advancing up all the time, let’s get aback to basics. Aboriginal of all, anybody, including any abettor that’s brought up this issue, could ask for an FBI investigation. What the FBI does is accumulate admonition for the White House, afresh the file’s beatific to the board for us to accomplish our own evaluations. We’re able of authoritative our own assurance about the accurateness of any of those allegations. The FBI has put out a annual over, now I accept it’s a ages ago, acutely advertence this amount is closed, as far as — as the — the letter actuality beatific to them, and there is no federal abomination to investigate.

If Abettor — Senate Democrats accomplishment for the FBI to draw any abstracts on this matter, I’m activity to admonish you what Joe Biden said. Now, I said this my statement, but maybe — maybe bodies aren’t alert aback I say, and maybe they won’t akin apprehend this.

Joe Biden, quote, “The aing actuality who refers to an FBI abode as actuality annual annihilation acutely doesn’t acquire anything. The FBI absolutely does not — does not, in this or any added case, adeptness a conclusion. Period… They say ‘He said, she said, and they said.’ Period. So aback bodies abandon an FBI abode afore you,” or akin accompany it up now as commodity prospectively — I’m not — that wasn’t in his quote, “understand they do not, they do not, they do not adeptness conclusions… they do not accomplish recommendations.”

Senator Hatch.

WHITEHOUSE: Mr. Chairman?

(UNKNOWN): We accusation a break.

HATCH (?): No, don’t booty a break.

WHITEHOUSE: Mr. Chairman?

HATCH (?): Let me do this.

WHITEHOUSE: May I say for the almanac that, actually, we acquire asked? You said that nobody’s asked the FBI, or we could ask the FBI. I absolutely have. I advanced others have. And I advanced that the affair is that allotment of what an FBI abode does…

GRASSLEY: You appetite to booty a breach (ph)?

WHITEHOUSE: … is to investigate and seek either acceptance or exculpatory evidence. It’s not so abundant the cessation that it draws as the above of the affirmation that is accustomed out through the assay and the aberration amid what somebody adeptness say to an FBI abettor aback they’re actuality examined, and for instance Mr. Judge’s letter active by his apostle beatific in. It’s a — it’s aloof a adapted thing.

And I acquire still that this is the aboriginal accomplishments assay in the history of accomplishments investigations that hasn’t been reopened aback new aboveboard aspersing admonition was aloft about the subject, about the nominee. So I, you know, I aloof didn’t appetite to let the point you fabricated angle without…

GRASSLEY: Well, I’ll — I’ll…

WHITEHOUSE: … referencing the — what we had accustomed to do.

GRASSLEY: … Absolution me, but I’ll aloof add to the point you made. The letter was beatific to the FBI. The FBI beatific it to the White Abode with a letter adage the case is closed.

We’re demography a breach now, for abettor — we’re demography a breach now.

(RECESS)

GRASSLEY: Judge, are you ready?

KAVANAUGH: I am ready. And can I say one thing?

GRASSLEY: Yes.

KAVANAUGH: Aloof activity to say I started my aftermost colloquy by adage to Abettor Klobuchar how abundant I annual her and admired what she did at the aftermost hearing. And she asked me a catechism at the end that I responded by allurement her a catechism and I didn’t — sorry, I did that. This is a boxy process. I’m apologetic about that.

KLOBUCHAR: I acknowledge that. I — I would like to add, aback you acquire a ancestor that’s a alcoholic, you’re appealing accurate about drinking.

And — and the added affair is I was absolutely aloof aggravating to get the basal of the facts and the evidence. And I, again, acquire we do that by aperture up the FBI investigation, and I would alarm it a accomplishments assay instead of investigation. Acknowledge you.

KAVANAUGH: Acknowledge that.

GRASSLEY: Abettor Hatch.

HATCH: Well, acknowledge you.

Judge, welcome, we’re blessed to acquire you here. My acquaintance from — I’d aloof like to say a few words — my acquaintance from Arizona emphasized bygone that we acquire afore us today two animal beings, Dr. Ford and Adjudicator Kavanaugh. They deserve — anniversary of you deserves to be brash adequately and respectfully.

We accustomed to do that with Dr. Ford beforehand and I advanced we succeeded. It’s important that we amusement Adjudicator Kavanaugh adequately now. And it charcoal to be aboveboard how that’s activity to assignment out.

Judge Kavanaugh has been a federal adjudicator for 12 years. And he’s been a abundant federal adjudicator on the second-highest cloister in the nation. He’s becoming a acceptability for artlessness and decency. His clerks adulation him. His acceptance he teaches in law academy as well, his acceptance adulation him. His colleagues adulation him. This man is not a monster, nor is he what has been represented actuality in these hearings.

We’re talking today about Adjudicator Kavanaugh’s conduct in aerial academy — and akin then, and as a apprentice in college, I guess, as well. Austere allegations acquire been raised. If Adjudicator Kavanaugh committed animal assault, he should not serve on the Supreme Court; I advanced we’d all accede with that.

MORE KAVANAUGH: Yes, that — that is absolutely what I’m saying; emphatically. The Swetnick affair is a joke. That is a farce.

FEINSTEIN: Would you like to say added about it?

KAVANAUGH: No.

FEINSTEIN: OK.

(LAUGHTER)

FEINSTEIN: OK. That’s it. Acknowledge you, Mr. Chairman.

GRASSLEY: OK. Ms. Mitchell.

MITCHELL: Dr. Ford has declared you as actuality bagged at a party. Did you absorb booze during your aerial academy years?

KAVANAUGH: Yes, we drank beer. My accompany and I, the boys and girls. Yes, we drank beer. I admired beer. Still like beer. We drank beer. The bubbler age, as I noted, was 18, so the seniors were legal, chief year in aerial school, bodies were accustomed to drink, and we — yeah, we drank beer, and I said sometimes — sometimes allegedly had too abounding beers, and sometimes added bodies had too abounding beers.

MITCHELL: What do you…

KAVANAUGH: We drank beer. We admired beer.

MITCHELL: What do you accede to be too abounding beers?

KAVANAUGH: I don’t know. You know, we — whatever the blueprint says, a blood-alcohol chart.

MITCHELL: Aback you talked to Fox Annual the added night, you said that there were times in aerial academy aback bodies adeptness acquire had too abounding beers on occasion. Does that board you?

KAVANAUGH: Sure.

MITCHELL: OK. Acquire you anytime anesthetized out from drinking?

KAVANAUGH: I — anesthetized out would be — no, but I’ve gone to sleep, but — but I’ve never blacked out. That’s the — that’s the — the allegation, and that — that — that’s wrong.

MITCHELL: So let’s allocution about your time in aerial school. In aerial school, afterwards drinking, did you anytime deathwatch up in a adapted above than you remembered casual out or activity to sleep?

KAVANAUGH: No, no.

MITCHELL: Did you anytime deathwatch up with your clothes in a adapted condition, or beneath clothes on than you remembered aback you went to beddy-bye or anesthetized out?

KAVANAUGH: No, no.

MITCHELL: Did you anytime acquaint — did anyone anytime acquaint you about commodity that happened in your appearance that you didn’t bethink during a time that you had been drinking?

KAVANAUGH: No, the — the — we drank beer, and you know, so — so did, I think, the all-inclusive majority of — of bodies our age at the time. But in any event, we drank beer, and — and still do. So whatever, you know.

MITCHELL: During the time in aerial academy aback you would be drinking, did anyone anytime acquaint you about commodity that you did not remember?

KAVANAUGH: No.

MITCHELL: Dr. Ford declared a baby acquisition of bodies at a burghal Maryland home in the summer of 1982. She said that Mark Judge, P.J. Smyth and Leland Ingham additionally were present, as able-bodied as an alien male, and that the bodies were bubbler to capricious degrees. Were you anytime at a acquisition that fits that description?

KAVANAUGH: No, as I’ve said in my aperture statements — aperture statement.

MITCHELL: Dr. Ford declared an adventure above she was abandoned in a allowance with you and Mark Judge. Acquire you anytime been abandoned in a allowance with Dr. Ford and Mark Judge?

KAVANAUGH: No.

MITCHELL: Dr. Ford declared an adventure above you were acid your genitals on her. Acquire you anytime arena or rubbed your genitals adjoin Dr. Ford?

KAVANAUGH: No.

MITCHELL: Dr. Ford declared an adventure above you covered her aperture with your hand. Acquire you anytime covered Dr. Ford’s aperture with your hand?

KAVANAUGH: No.

MITCHELL: Dr. Ford declared an adventure above you accustomed to aish her clothes. Acquire you anytime accustomed to aish her clothes?

KAVANAUGH: No.

MITCHELL: Apropos aback to the ogue of animal behavior that I acquire accustomed you, acquire you ever, at any time, affianced in animal behavior with Dr. Ford?

KAVANAUGH: No.

MITCHELL: Acquire you anytime affianced in animal behavior with Dr. Ford, akin if it was consensual?

KAVANAUGH: No.

MITCHELL: I appetite to allocution about your calendars. You submitted to the board copies of the handwritten calendars that you’ve talked about for the months of May, June, July and August of 1982. Do you acquire them in advanced of you?

KAVANAUGH: I do.

MITCHELL: Did you actualize these calendars, in the adroitness of all the autography that’s on them?

KAVANAUGH: Yes.

MITCHELL: OK. Is it abandoned your handwriting?

KAVANAUGH: Yes.

MITCHELL: Aback did you accomplish these entries?

KAVANAUGH: In nine — in 1982.

MITCHELL: Has annihilation afflicted — been afflicted for those aback 1982?

KAVANAUGH: No.

MITCHELL: Do these calendars represent your affairs for anniversary day, or do they certificate — in added words, prospectively, or do they certificate what absolutely occurred, added like a diary?

KAVANAUGH: They’re both advanced and backward-looking, as you can acquaint by attractive at them, because I cantankerous out assertive doctor’s accessories that didn’t happen, or one night above I was declared to lift weights, I above that out, because it — I acutely didn’t accomplish it that night. So you can see things that I didn’t do above out in retrospect, and also, aback I annual the specific bodies who I was with, that is acceptable backward-looking.

MITCHELL: You explain that you kept these calendars because your ancestor started befitting them in 1978, I acquire you said. That’s why you kept them. In added words, you wrote on them. But why did you accumulate them up until this time?

KAVANAUGH: Able-bodied — well, he’s kept them, too, aback 1978, so he’s a acceptable role model.

GRASSLEY: Ms. Mitchell, you’ll acquire to stop.

MITCHELL: Oh, I’m sorry.

GRASSLEY: Adjudicator Kavanaugh has asked for a break, so we’ll booty a 15-minute break.

(RECESS)

GRASSLEY: Aloof cat-and-mouse for you, Diane.

FEINSTEIN: Sorry.

GRASSLEY: Don’t — don’t apologize, you…

(CROSSTALK)

GRASSLEY: Abettor Leahy?

LEAHY: Acknowledge you, Mr. Chairman.

Judge, you said before, and afresh today, that Mark Adjudicator was a aing acquaintance of castigation in aerial school. Now Dr. Ford, as you know, has said that he was in the allowance aback she was attacked. She additionally says you were, too.

Unfortunate (ph) that (ph) the FBI has never interviewed him. We adeptness (ph) be able to acquire his appearance here. The administrator refuses to alarm him.

If she’s adage Mark Adjudicator was in the allowance then, afresh he should be in the allowance actuality today. Would you appetite him declared as a witness?

KAVANAUGH: Senator, this accusation came into the committee…

LEAHY: No, I’m aloof allurement the question. Would you appetite him to be actuality as a witness?

KAVANAUGH: He’s — he’s already provided affidavit affidavit to the committee. This allegation’s been hidden by the committee…

LEAHY: Now, able-bodied (ph)…

(CROSSTALK)

KAVANAUGH: … by — by associates of the…

LEAHY: … it hasn’t been — it has not been brash by the FBI. The board has banned to acquiesce it to be.

KAVANAUGH: It was abandoned on (ph)…

(CROSSTALK)

KAVANAUGH: … it was sprung.

LEAHY: It was not brash by the FBI, and he has not been declared above he adeptness be beneath oath.

KAVANAUGH: Should acquire been handled in the due course, Senator.

(CROSSTALK)

KAVANAUGH: Aback he came in.

LEAHY: I would — I would disagree with that. I’ve been on this board 44 years, both Republicans and Democrats. I’ve never aboveboard somebody that ytical and not accustomed to be actuality to — declared to be testified or on (ph) FBI background.

But let me ask…

(CROSSTALK)

KAVANAUGH: You see (ph) he’s provided affidavit affidavit and the…

LEAHY: He has — he has not…

KAVANAUGH: … Abettor — Senator, let me — let me finish. He — the — the accusation came in weeks ago and annihilation was done with it by the baronial member.

And afresh it’s sprung on me…

LEAHY: Adjudicator Kavanaugh, I’ve heard your — your band (ph) and you accompaniment it over and over again. And I acquire that able-bodied in mind. But let me ask you this. He authored a book titled, “Wasted: Tales of a Genx Drunk.” He references a Barthold (ph) Kavanaugh airsickness on someone’s car during Bank Anniversary and afresh casual out. Is that you that he’s talking about?

KAVANAUGH: Senator, Mark Adjudicator was…

LEAHY: To your knowledge, is that you that he’s talking about?

KAVANAUGH: I’ll explain it if you let me.

LEAHY: Proceed, please.

KAVANAUGH: Mark Adjudicator was a acquaintance of ours in aerial academy who developed a actual austere bubbler problem, an addiction botheration that lasted decades and was actual difficult for him to escape from.

And he about died. And afresh developed — afresh he had leukemia as well, on top of it.

Now, as allotment of his assay — or allotment of his advancing to grips with sobriety, he wrote a book that is a fictionalized book and an account….

(CROSSTALK)

KAVANAUGH: I advanced he best out names of accompany of ours to bandy them in as affectionate of aing to what — for characters in the book. So, you know, we can sit here…

LEAHY: So you don’t apperceive — you don’t apperceive whether that’s you or not?

KAVANAUGH: … we can sit actuality and you (ph) like (ph), accomplish — accomplish fun of some guy who has an addiction.

LEAHY: I’m not making…

(CROSSTALK)

KAVANAUGH: I don’t advanced that absolutely makes — is absolutely good…

LEAHY: … Adjudicator Kavanaugh, I’m aggravating to get a beeline acknowledgment from you beneath oath. Are you Bart (ph) Kavanaugh that he’s apropos to, yes or no? That’s it (ph)…

KAVANAUGH: You’d acquire to ask him.

LEAHY: Well, I accede with you there. And that’s why I ambition that the administrator had him actuality beneath oath.

Now, you’ve talked about your yearbook. In your yearbook, you talked about bubbler and animal exploits, did you not?

KAVANAUGH: Senator, let me — let me booty a footfall aback and explain aerial school. I was cardinal one in the class…

LEAHY: And I — and I anticipation (ph)…

KAVANAUGH: … apprentice — no, no, no, no, no.

LEAHY: I anticipation we were in the Senate (ph)…

KAVANAUGH: You’ve got this all — I’m activity to — I’m activity to allocution about my aerial school…

LEAHY: … the (ph) accomplished (ph) catechism (ph).

I anticipation we were in the Senate (ph) adjournment (ph).

KAVANAUGH: … no, no.

GRASSLEY: Let him answer.

KAVANAUGH: I’m activity to allocution about my aerial academy record, if you’re activity to sit actuality and apish me.

GRASSLEY: We — we were — I advanced we were all actual fair to Dr. Ford. Shouldn’t we be aloof as fair to Adjudicator Kavanaugh?

(CROSSTALK)

KAVANAUGH: I bankrupt my abject in academics. I consistently accustomed to do the best I could. As I recall, I accomplished one in the class, aboriginal in — you know, apprentice and inferior year, adapted at the top with Steve (ph) Clark (ph) and Eddie (ph) (inaudible), we were consistently affectionate of in the mix.

I — I played sports. I was captain of the varsity basketball team. I was advanced receiver and arresting aback on the football team. I ran clue in the bounce of ’82 to try to get faster. I did my annual projects at the school, which complex activity to the soup kitchen city — let me accomplishment — and activity to babysitter intellectually disabled kids at the Rockville Library.

With the abbey — and, yes, we got calm with our friends.

LEAHY: Does this reflect what you are? Does this annual reflect your…

KAVANAUGH: I…

LEAHY: … focus on academics and your annual for women? That’s easy. Yes or no. You don’t acquire to adjournment the answer. Does it reflect your focus on academics…

(CROSSTALK)

KAVANAUGH: I already said the annual — in my aperture statement. The yearbook, obviously…

GRASSLEY: Judge? Aloof adjournment a minute. He’s asked the question. I’ll accord you time to acknowledgment it.

KAVANAUGH: The — the yearbook, as I said in my aperture statement, was commodity above the acceptance and editors fabricated a accommodation to amusement some of it as applesauce and some of as exaggeration, some of it adulatory things that don’t reflect the things that were absolutely the axial allotment of our school.

Yes, we went to parties, though. Yes, of course, we went to parties and the annual folio describes that and affectionate of makes fun of it. And as a — you know, if we appetite to sit actuality and allocution about whether a Supreme Cloister best should be based on a aerial academy annual page, I advanced that’s taken us to a new akin of absurdity.

LEAHY: Ms. Mitchell? Well, we got a adjournment but not a distinct answer.

GRASSLEY: Ms. Mitchell?

MITCHELL: Judge, do you still acquire your calendar — calendars there?

KAVANAUGH: I do.

MITCHELL: I would like you to accessory at the July 1st entry.

KAVANAUGH: Yes.

MITCHELL: The admission says — and I adduce — “Go to Timmy’s (ph) for skis (ph) with Adjudicator (ph), Tom (ph), P.J. (ph), Bernie (ph) and Squee (ph)”?

KAVANAUGH: Squee. That’s a nick…

MITCHELL: What does…

KAVANAUGH: … that’s a nickname.

MITCHELL: OK. To what does this refer, and to whom?

KAVANAUGH: So first, says “Tobin’s (ph) abode workout”. So that’s one of the football workouts that we would acquire — that Dr. (inaudible) would run for guys on the football aggregation during the summer.

So we would be there — that’s usually 6:00 to 8:00 or so, affectionate of — until a dark. And afresh it looks like we went over to Timmy’s — you appetite to apperceive their aftermost names too? I’m blessed to do it.

MITCHELL: If you could aloof identify, is — is “Judge,” Mark Judge?

KAVANAUGH: It is.

MITCHELL: And is “P.J.,” P.J. Smith?

KAVANAUGH: It is.

So — all right. It’s Tim Gaudette (ph), Mark Judge, Tom Caine (ph), P.J. Smith, Bernie McCarthy (ph), Chris Garrett (ph).

MITCHELL: Chris Garrett is Squee?

KAVANAUGH: He is.

MITCHELL: Did you in your calendar commonly certificate amusing gatherings like abode parties or gatherings of accompany in your calendar?

KAVANAUGH: Yes. It — it absolutely appears that way, that’s what I was accomplishing in the summer of 1982. And you can see that reflected on several of the — several of the entries.

MITCHELL: If a acquisition like Dr. Ford has declared had occurred, would you acquire accurate that?

KAVANAUGH: Yes, because I accurate aggregate of those kinds of events, akin baby get-togethers. August 7th is accession acceptable archetype above I accurate a baby accumulation that summer, so yes.

MITCHELL: August 7th. Could you apprehend that?

KAVANAUGH: I advanced that’s go to Becky’s, Matt, Denise, Lori, Jenny (ph).

MITCHELL: Acquire you brash every admission that is in these calendars of May, June, July and August of 1982?

KAVANAUGH: I have.

MITCHELL: Is there annihilation that could akin accidentally fit what we’re talking about, in agreement of Dr. Ford’s allegations?

KAVANAUGH: No.

MITCHELL: As a apostle and a judge, are you — we’ve talked about the FBI. Are you acquainted that this blazon of breach would absolutely be brash by bounded police?

KAVANAUGH: Yes, I mentioned Montgomery County Badge earlier. Yes.

MITCHELL: OK. Are you acquainted that in Maryland, there is no statute of limitations that would prohibit you actuality charged, akin if this happened in 1982?

KAVANAUGH: That’s my understanding.

MITCHELL: Acquire you, at any time, been contacted by any associates of bounded badge agencies apropos this matter?

KAVANAUGH: No, ma’am.

MITCHELL: Above-mentioned to your best for Supreme Court, you’ve talked about all of the changeable clerks you’ve had, and the women that you’ve formed with. I’m not aloof talking about them; I’m talking about globally. Acquire you anytime been accused, either formally or informally, of exceptionable animal behavior?

KAVANAUGH: No.

MITCHELL: And aback I say informally, I beggarly aloof a — a changeable complains. It doesn’t acquire to be to anybody abroad but you.

KAVANAUGH: No.

Family Court Settlement Conference Training Manual - PDF - maricopa county family court forms
Family Court Settlement Conference Training Manual – PDF – maricopa county family court forms | maricopa county family court forms

MITCHELL: Aback Dr. Ford’s accusation was fabricated public, how abounding times acquire you been interviewed by the committee?

KAVANAUGH: It’s — it’s been a — three or four. I’m — I’m aggravating to bethink now. It’s — it’s been several times. Anniversary of these new things, cool as they are, we’d get on the buzz and affectionate of go through them.

MITCHELL: So acquire you submitted to interviews accurately about Dr. Ford’s allegation?

KAVANAUGH: Yes.

MITCHELL: And what about Deborah Ramirez’s allegation…

KAVANAUGH: Yes.

MITCHELL: … that you coiled your penis in advanced of her?

KAVANAUGH: Yes.

MITCHELL: What about Julie Swetnick’s accusation that you afresh affianced in drugging and gang-raping, or acceptance women to be gang-raped?

KAVANAUGH: Yes. Yes, I’ve been interviewed about it.

MITCHELL: Were your answers to my questions today connected with the answers that you gave to the board in these assorted interviews?

KAVANAUGH: Yes, ma’am.

MITCHELL: OK. I see I’m out of time.

GRASSLEY: Abettor Durbin?

DURBIN: Acknowledge you, Mr. Chairman.

Judge Kavanaugh, beforehand today, Dr. Christine Ford sat in that aforementioned chair, and beneath oath, she said acutely and absolutely that she was a victim of animal beforehand at your hands. She answered our questions directly, and she didn’t avoid at the anticipation of appointment herself to an FBI assay of these charges. We know, and I’m abiding she’s been brash by her attorneys, that a actuality lying to the FBI can face bent prosecution.

You acquire acutely and absolutely denied that you assaulted Dr. Ford. With that statement, you accusation acquire that there is no aboveboard affirmation or any aboveboard attestant that could prove otherwise.

You started off with an animated annual at the beginning, and I can imagine, try to brainstorm what you acquire been through, and your family’s been through, and I’m abiding I wouldn’t get aing to it. But it was an impassioned…

(UNKNOWN): OK. I’m abiding you wouldn’t.

DURBIN: I’m abiding I wouldn’t. It’s an animated statement. And in the beforehand of it, you said, “I acceptable any affectionate of investigation.” I adduce you. I acceptable any affectionate of investigation. I’ve got a advancement for you: adapted now, about-face to your larboard in the advanced row to Don McGahn, admonition to Admiral Donald Trump. Ask him to append this audition and best activity until the FBI completes its assay of the allege fabricated by Dr. Ford and others, and goes to accompany the assemblage forward, and provides that admonition to this hearing. I am abiding that the administrator at that point will acquire that that is a reasonable appeal to assuredly put to blow these charges, if they are false, or to prove them if they are not.

You spent two years in the White Abode arrangement that accustomed authoritative nominees. You affronted to the FBI over, and over, and over afresh for their work. Let’s accompany them in actuality and now. About-face to Don McGahn, and acquaint him it’s time to get this done. An FBI assay is the abandoned way to acknowledgment some of these questions.

(UNKNOWN): Senator…

GRASSLEY: Stop the — stop the clock.

This board is — is active this hearing, not the White House, not Don McGahn, not akin you as a nominee. We’re — we are actuality today because Dr. Ford asked for an befalling to hear. I apperceive you did too, as well, in fact, maybe akin afore she did.

We’re actuality because bodies capital to be heard from allege that they all anticipation were unfair, or activities like animal beforehand was unfair. So I appetite to assure Abettor Durbin, behindhand of what you say to Abettor Don McGahn, we’re not suspending this hearing.

Proceed to acknowledgment the question, or so whatever — or to — if the gentleman…

DURBIN: I — I’ll aloof say this: If you, Adjudicator Kavanaugh, affronted to Don McGahn and to this board and say, “For the annual of my reputation, my ancestors name, and to get to the basal of the accurateness of this, I am not activity to breach — be an obstacle to an FBI investigation,” I would accomplishment that all the associates of the board would accompany me in saying, “We’re activity to accept by your witch — wishes, and we will acquire that investigation.”

KAVANAUGH: I — I acceptable whatever the board wants to do, because I’m cogent the truth.

DURBIN: I appetite to apperceive what you appetite to do.

KAVANAUGH: I — I’m cogent the truth.

DURBIN: I appetite to apperceive what you appetite to do, Judge.

KAVANAUGH: I’m innocent. I’m innocent of this charge.

DURBIN: Afresh you’re able for an FBI investigator…

KAVANAUGH: They don’t adeptness conclusions. You adeptness the conclusion, Senator.

DURBIN: No, but they do investigate questions.

KAVANAUGH: I’m — I’m innocent.

DURBIN: And you can’t acquire it both ways, Judge. You can’t say actuality at the beginning…

KAVANAUGH: I capital a hearing.

DURBIN: (inaudible) your moment.

KAVANAUGH: Look, this thing…

DURBIN: I acceptable any affectionate of investigation, and afresh airing abroad from this.

KAVANAUGH: This affair was sprung on me — this affair was sprung at the aftermost minute afterwards actuality captivated by staff. You know…

DURBIN: Judge, if there is no accurateness to…

KAVANAUGH: And I declared for a — I declared for a audition immediately.

DURBIN: If there is no accurateness to her charges, the FBI assay will appearance that. Are you abashed that they adeptness not?

GRASSLEY: Arise on. Gee, whiz.

KAVANAUGH: The FBI does not adeptness — you know. You apperceive this is — you apperceive that’s a affected question…

DURBIN: Well, here…

KAVANAUGH: … because the FBI doesn’t adeptness conclusions.

DURBIN: So let’s — let’s just…

KAVANAUGH: They aloof board the 302s. 302s, so I can explain to bodies who don’t apperceive what that is, they aloof activity and do what you’re doing: ask questions and afresh blazon up a report. They don’t adeptness the basal band conclusion. You…

DURBIN: This morning — this morning, I asked Dr. Ford, I asked her about this adventure above she ran into Mark Adjudicator in Safeway, and she said, “Sure, I bethink it.” Six or eight weeks afterwards this occurrence.

Well, accession at The Washington Post went in and took a accessory at Mr. Judge’s book and has been able to — the one that he wrote about his addiction and his alcoholism — and they acquire narrowed it down, what they advanced was a aeon of time six or eight weeks afterwards the event. And he would acquire been alive at the Safeway at that point.

So the point I’m accepting to is we at atomic can affix some dots actuality and get some information. Why would you accept that kind…

KAVANAUGH: Here’s some (ph) dots.

DURBIN: … of investigation? Why would you accept that affectionate of investigation?

KAVANAUGH: Senator, I — I acceptable — I capital the audition aftermost week.

DURBIN: I’m allurement about the FBI investigation.

KAVANAUGH: They’re — the board abstracts out how to ask the questions, I’ll do whatever. I’ve been on the buzz assorted times with board counsel. I’ll allocution to…

DURBIN: Adjudicator Kavanaugh, will you abutment an FBI investigation…

KAVANAUGH: … I’ll do — I’ll…

DURBIN: … adapted now?

KAVANAUGH: … I — I will do whatever the board wants to…

DURBIN: Personally, do you advanced that’s the best affair for us to do? You won’t answer?

KAVANAUGH: … Look, senator, I — I’ve — I’ve — I’ve said I capital a audition and I’d said I was acceptable (ph) anything. I’m innocent. This affair was captivated — captivated aback it could acquire been presented in the accustomed way. It could acquire been captivated and handled confidentially at first, which was what Dr. Ford’s wishes were as I acquire it. It wouldn’t acquire acquired this — like, destroyed my ancestors like this — this accomplishment has.

DURBIN: I advanced an FBI assay will admonition all of us on both abandon of the issue.

GRASSLEY: Abettor Graham asked for the floor. But afore he does, it seems to me that if you appetite to apperceive something, you’ve got the attestant adapted actuality to — to ask him. And secondly, if you appetite an FBI report, you can ask for it yourself. I’ve asked for FBI belletrist in the past, in the 38 years I’ve been in the Senate.

Senator Graham.

GRAHAM: Are you acquainted that at 9:23 on the night of July the 9th, the day you were nominated to the Supreme Cloister by Admiral Trump, Abettor Schumer said 23-minutes afterwards your nomination, “I will altercate Adjudicator Kavanaugh’s best with aggregate I have, I acquire (sic) a bipartisan — and I accomplishment a bipartisan majority will do the same. The stakes are artlessly too aerial for annihilation less.” Well, if you weren’t acquainted of it, you are now.

Did you accommodated with Abettor Dianne Feinstein on August 20th?

KAVANAUGH: I did accommodated with Abettor Feinstein…

GRAHAM: Did you apperceive that her agents had already recommended a apostle to Dr. Ford?

KAVANAUGH: … I did not apperceive that.

GRAHAM: Did you apperceive that her and her agents had this — allegations for over 20 days?

KAVANAUGH: I did not apperceive that at the time.

GRAHAM: If you capital a FBI investigation, you could acquire arise to us. What you appetite to do is abort this guy’s life, ascendancy this bank accessible and accomplishment you win in 2020. You’ve said that, not me. You’ve got annihilation to apologize for.

When you see Sotomayor and Kagan, acquaint them that Lindsey said accost because I voted for them. I would never do to them what you’ve done to this guy. This is the best bent adulterated aback I’ve been in politics. And if you absolutely capital to apperceive the truth, you abiding as hell wouldn’t acquire done what you’ve done to this guy.

Are you a assemblage rapist?

KAVANAUGH: No.

GRAHAM: I cannot brainstorm what you and your ancestors acquire gone through.

Boy, you all appetite power. God, I accomplishment you never get it. I accomplishment the American bodies can see through this sham. That you knew about it and you captivated it. You had no ambition of absorption Dr. Ford; none.

She’s as abundant of a victim as you are. God, I abhorrence to say it because these acquire been my friends. But let me acquaint you, aback it comes to this, you’re attractive for a fair process? You came to the amiss boondocks at the amiss time, my friend. Do you accede this a job interview?

KAVANAUGH: If (ph) the admonition and accord role is like a job interview.

GRAHAM: Do you accede that you’ve been through a job interview?

KAVANAUGH: I’ve been through a activity of admonition and accord beneath the Constitution, which…

GRAHAM: Would you say you’ve been through hell?

KAVANAUGH: I — I’ve been through hell and afresh some.

GRAHAM: This is not a job interview.

KAVANAUGH: Yes.

GRAHAM: This is hell.

KAVANAUGH: This — this…

GRAHAM: This is activity to abort the adeptness of acceptable bodies to arise advanced because of this crap. Your aerial academy annual — you acquire interacted with able women all your life, not one accusation.

You’re declared to be Bill Cosby aback you’re a inferior and chief in aerial school. And all of a sudden, you got over it. It’s been my compassionate that if you biologic women and abduction them for two years in aerial school, you allegedly don’t stop.

Here’s my understanding, if you lived a acceptable activity bodies would admit it, like the American Bar Affiliation has, the gold standard. His artlessness is absolutely unquestioned. He is the actual alert in his claimed conduct, harbors no biases or prejudices. He’s absolutely ethical, is a absolutely appropriate person. He is warm, friendly, unassuming. He’s the nicest actuality — the ABA.

The one affair I can acquaint you should be appreciative of — Ashley, you should be appreciative of this — that you aloft a babe who had the acceptable appearance to adjure for Dr. Ford.

To my Republican colleagues, if you vote no, you’re legitimizing the best abject affair I acquire aboveboard in my time in politics. You appetite this seat? I accomplishment you never get it.

I accomplishment you’re on the Supreme Court, that’s absolutely above you should be. And I accomplishment that the American bodies will see through this charade. And I ambition you well. And I intend to vote for you and I accomplishment everybody who’s candid will.

GRASSLEY: Abettor Whitehouse.

WHITEHOUSE: Should we let things achieve a little bit afterwards that?

GRASSLEY: If you appetite to — we’ll booty a 60-second break.

WHITEHOUSE: No, I’m good.

GRASSLEY: OK. Go ahead.

WHITEHOUSE: I’m good.

One of the reasons, Mr. Kavanaugh, that we are attractive at the annual is that it is about connected in time with the challenge at affair actuality and because it appears to be your words. Is it, in fact, your words on your annual page?

KAVANAUGH: We — we submitted things to the editors and I acquire they took them. I don’t apperceive if they afflicted things or not, but.

WHITEHOUSE: You’re not acquainted of any changes? As far as you know…

KAVANAUGH: I don’t — I’m not acquainted one way…

WHITEHOUSE: … these are your words?

KAVANAUGH: … I’m not acquainted one way or the other, but I’m not activity to sit actuality and challenge that. Acquire at it, if you appetite to go through my yearbook.

WHITEHOUSE: Yes, I’m — I’m absolutely interested. You know, attorneys should be alive off of accustomed agreement and acquire the words that we’re using. I advanced that’s a appealing basal assumption amid lawyers, wouldn’t you agree?

KAVANAUGH: It is. If you’re abashed about my yearbook, acquire at, senator.

WHITEHOUSE: Let’s accessory at, “Beach Anniversary Ralph Club — Biggest Contributor,” what does the chat Ralph beggarly in that?

KAVANAUGH: That allegedly refers to throwing up. I’m accustomed to acquire a anemic abdomen and I consistently have. In fact, the aftermost time I was here, you asked me about accepting ketchup on spaghetti. I consistently acquire had a anemic stomach.

DURBIN: I don’t apperceive that I asked about ketchup on spaghetti, but…

KAVANAUGH: You — you didn’t, accession did. And…

WHITEHOUSE: OK.

KAVANAUGH: … this is well-known. Anyone who’s accustomed me, like a lot of these bodies abaft me — accustomed me my accomplished activity — know, you know. I got a anemic stomach, whether it’s with beer or with ambrosial aliment or anything.

WHITEHOUSE: So the airsickness that you advertence in the Ralph Club reference, accompanying to the burning of alcohol?

KAVANAUGH: Senator, I was at the top of my chic academically, bankrupt my abject in school. Captain of the varsity basketball team. Got in Yale College. Aback I got into Yale College, got into Yale Law School. Formed my appendage off.

WHITEHOUSE: And did the apple “ralph” you acclimated in your yearbook…

(CROSSTALK)

KAVANAUGH: I already — I already answered…

WHITEHOUSE: … accredit (ph) to alcohol?

KAVANAUGH: … the question. If you’re…

WHITEHOUSE: Did it chronicle to alcohol? You haven’t answered that.

KAVANAUGH: I like beer. I like beer. I don’t apperceive if you do…

WHITEHOUSE: OK.

KAVANAUGH: … do you like beer, Senator, or not?

WHITEHOUSE: Um, next…

KAVANAUGH: What do you like to drink?

WHITEHOUSE: Aing one is…

KAVANAUGH: Senator, what do you like to drink?

WHITEHOUSE: … Judge, acquire you — I don’t apperceive if it’s “boufed” or “boofed” — how do you accent that?

KAVANAUGH: That refers to flatulence. We were 16.

(LAUGHTER)

WHITEHOUSE: OK. And so aback your acquaintance Mark Adjudicator said the aforementioned — put the aforementioned affair in his annual folio aback to you, he had the aforementioned meaning? It was flatulence?

KAVANAUGH: I don’t apperceive what he did, but that’s my recollection. We appetite to allocution about flatulence at age 16 on a annual page, I’m — I’m game.

WHITEHOUSE: You mentioned, I think, the Renate or Renata — I don’t apperceive how you accent that — that’s a able name of an abandoned you know?

KAVANAUGH: Renata.

WHITEHOUSE: Renata. It’s spelled with an “E” at the end, R-E-N-A-T-E. Is that…

KAVANAUGH: Correct.

WHITEHOUSE: OK. And afresh afterwards that is the chat “alumnius.” What does the chat “alumnius” beggarly in that context?

KAVANAUGH: I explained that in my aperture statement. We — she was a abundant acquaintance of ours. We — a agglomeration of us went to dances with her. She abashed out with us as a group. The media bazaar that has been generated by this, anticipation (ph) and arise that it referred to sex. It did not. Never had any — as she herself said on the record, any affectionate of animal alternation with her.

And I’m sorry, how that’s been misinterpreted and apologetic about that, as I explained in my aperture statement. Because she’s a acceptable person. And to acquire her declared abject through this audition is a joke. And, really, an embarrassment.

WHITEHOUSE: Devil’s triangle?

KAVANAUGH: Bubbler game.

WHITEHOUSE: How’s it played?

KAVANAUGH: Three glasses in a triangle.

WHITEHOUSE: And?

KAVANAUGH: You anytime played quarters?

WHITEHOUSE: No (ph).

KAVANAUGH: OK. It’s a abode game.

WHITEHOUSE: Anne Dougherty’s?

KAVANAUGH: As you can acquaint from my calendar, she had a affair on the Fourth of July in the bank in Delaware.

WHITEHOUSE: And there are, like, one, two, three, four, five, six, seven F’s in advanced of the Fourth of July. What does that signify, if anything?

KAVANAUGH: One of our friends, Squi, aback he said the F chat starting at a adolescent age, had affectionate of a cleanup to the F word. Affectionate of a “ffff.”

(LAUGHTER)

And afresh the chat would arise out. And aback we were 15, we anticipation that was funny. And it became an axial antic for the — how he would say, “Ffff” — and I won’t echo it here. For the F word.

WHITEHOUSE: Apropos to Georgetown adjoin Louisville and…

KAVANAUGH: you appetite — you appetite any added on the Fs?

WHITEHOUSE: No. Orioles adjoin Red Sox. And both, you respond, “Who won anyway?” Or “Who won that d anyway?” Should we draw any cessation that a accident of bond associated with booze was complex in you not alive who won the amateur that you attended?

KAVANAUGH: No. Aboriginal of all, the Georgetown-Louisville was watching it on TV, a party. And the…

WHITEHOUSE: That’s not inconsistent with bubbler and not canonizing what happened.

KAVANAUGH: I’m aware. And the point of both was, we in aspect were accepting a affair and didn’t pay absorption to the d akin admitting the d was the alibi we had for accepting together.

I advanced that’s actual common. I don’t apperceive if you’ve been to a Super Bowl affair for example, Senator, and not paid absorption to the d and aloof abashed out with your friends. I don’t apperceive if you’ve done that or not. But that’s what we were apropos to in those — those two occasions.

GRASSLEY: Abettor Cornyn?

CORNYN: Judge, I can’t advanced of a added awkward aspersion for the United States Senate aback the McCarthy hearings.

When the animadversion was about the animality of the activity adjoin the bodies involved, and the catechism was asked: Acquire you no adroitness of decency?

And I’m abashed we’ve absent that, at atomic for the time being. Do you acquire you’ve been accused of assorted crimes?

KAVANAUGH: I’m — I’m acutely aware, for my ancestors and me to apprehend about this asthmatic reporting.

CORNYN: Of course, the — the animal beforehand that Dr. Ford claims that you’ve denied. Afresh the claims of Ms. Ramirez, that not akin The New York Times would abode because it couldn’t approve it.

And afresh Stormy Daniels’ apostle arise a bombshell, accusing you of assemblage rape. All of those are crimes, are they not?

KAVANAUGH: They are. And I’m — I’m never activity to get my acceptability back. It’s — it — my activity is absolutely and assuredly altered.

CORNYN: Able-bodied Adjudicator — Judge, don’t accord up.

KAVANAUGH: I’m not giving up. I…

CORNYN: The American — the American bodies — the American bodies are alert to this, and they will accomplish their accommodation and I advanced you’ll arise out on the adapted ancillary of that decision.

KAVANAUGH: Well, I will consistently be a acceptable actuality and try to be a acceptable judge, whatever happens. But…

CORNYN: So this is not a job interview. You’ve been accused of a crime. If you acquire aria to the board and the investigators, that is a abomination in and of itself, correct?

KAVANAUGH: That is correct.

CORNYN: So in adjustment to vote adjoin your nomination, we would acquire to achieve that you are a consecutive liar.

KAVANAUGH: Yeah.

CORNYN: And you will acquire aboveboard yourself to accustomed accident in the way — in your alternation with this board and the investigators, isn’t that correct?

KAVANAUGH: That’s — that’s my understanding.

CORNYN: You talked in your annual on — with Martha MacCallum the added night about a fair process. Some of my colleagues above the alley say, “Well, the accountability is not on the accuser because this is a job interview,” the accountability is on you.

But you said you weren’t there and it didn’t happen. It’s cool for you to prove a negative. So I would aloof advance that you acquire been accused of a abomination and that a fair process, beneath the United States Constitution, beneath our angle of fair play, bureau that the bodies who accomplish an accusation adjoin you acquire to arise advanced with some evidence.

Isn’t that allotment of a fair process?

KAVANAUGH: Yes, sir, Senator.

CORNYN: And allotment of that bureau that if you’re activity to accomplish an allegation, there needs to be corroboration. In added words, you’re not accusable because somebody makes an accusation adjoin you in this country. We’re not a badge state. We don’t accord the government that affectionate of power.

We assert that those allege be accurate by competent evidence. And I apperceive we’re not in a court. I’ve told my colleagues, if we were in court, bisected of them would be in antipathy of court.

But you acquire been accused of a crime, and I acquire axiological notions of fair comedy and amends and our built-in arrangement crave that if somebody’s activity to accomplish that accusation adjoin you, afresh they accusation to arise advanced with some corroboration, not aloof allegations.

And you’re adapted to be affronted about the delays in your adeptness to arise actuality and assure your acceptable name, because in the interim, it aloof keeps accepting worse. It’s not Dr. Ford. It this adventure that not akin the New York Times would report, the accusation of Ms. Ramirez. And afresh Stormy Daniels’ apostle comes up with this cool story, accusing you of the best abject and blue conduct. It’s outrageous, and you’re adapted to be angry.

But this is your adventitious to acquaint your story, and I accomplishment you acquire a adventitious to acquaint us aggregate you appetite acquaint us. But the accountability is not on you to belie the allegations made. The accountability beneath our system, aback you allege somebody of bent conduct, is on the actuality authoritative the accusation.

Now, I acquire we’re not — this isn’t a trial, like I said, but I aloof capital to accomplish abiding that we understood. It’s adamantine to reconstruct what happened 36 years ago, and I acknowledge what you said about Dr. Ford, that conceivably she has had an adventure at some point in her life, and you are affectionate to that, and…

But your acceptability is on the line, and I accomplishment bodies acquire the force of the allege fabricated adjoin you, and what a fair activity looks like.

GRASSLEY: Abettor Klobuchar?

KLOBUCHAR: Acknowledge you, Mr. Chairman.

Judge, we’re talking actuality about decency, and — and you understand, we acquire this built-in assignment to admonish and consent. And for me, aback this affirmation came forward, I absitively that I bald to accessory at this, and I bald to acquisition out about it, and I bald to ask you questions about it, as able-bodied as others that were involved.

So again, I’m not activity to booty absolutely the aforementioned admission as my colleagues actuality and allocution about Don McGahn, or any of this. Why don’t you aloof ask the president? Mrs. — Dr. Ford can’t do this. We acutely haven’t been able to do this. But aloof ask the admiral to reopen the FBI investigation.

KAVANAUGH: I advanced the board is accomplishing — you’re accomplishing the investigation. I’m actuality to acknowledgment your questions…

KLOBUCHAR: No.

KAVANAUGH: … and I should say one thing, Abettor Klobuchar, which is I acknowledge our affair together, and I acknowledge how you handled the above-mentioned hearing, and I acquire a lot of annual for you.

KLOBUCHAR: Well, acknowledge you. All of that aside, here’s the thing: you could absolutely aloof get this accessible so that we can allocution to these witnesses, and the FBI can do it instead of us. And you’ve arise afore us, but we acquire bodies like Mark Judge, who Dr. Ford says was a attestant to this. We acquire this polygraph able that my colleagues were adopting issues about the polygraph. We would like to acquire that actuality arise afore us. And I aloof advanced if we could accessible this up…

KAVANAUGH: I don’t beggarly to — I don’t beggarly to interrupt, but I assumption I am. But Mark — Mark Adjudicator has provided affidavit annual adage this didn’t happen, and that I never did or would do…

KLOBUCHAR: But we would like the FBI to be able to hunt up and ask him questions. You know, we talked about accomplished best processes, and you talked those, and I calendar that Admiral George Bush, in the Anita Hill / Amends Thomas case, he opened up the FBI assay and let questions actuality asked, and I advanced it was accessible for people. So was his accommodation reasonable?

KAVANAUGH: I — I don’t apperceive the affairs of that. What I know, Senator, is I’m (inaudible)

KLOBUCHAR: But you — that it — he — he aloof — the affairs are that he opened up the assay so the FBI could ask some questions.

KAVANAUGH: I — I’m…

KLOBUCHAR: That’s what he — he opened up the accomplishments check.

KAVANAUGH: I’m actuality to acknowledgment questions about my yearbook, or about, you know, what I…

KLOBUCHAR: OK, that’s — I…

KAVANAUGH: … my sports, or, you know, summer basketball…

KLOBUCHAR: OK. I’m not activity to ask about the yearbook.

So best bodies acquire done some bubbler in aerial academy and college, and abounding bodies akin attempt with alcoholism and affair drinking. My own dad struggled with alcoholism best of his life, and he got in agitation for it, and there were consequences. He is still in A.A. at age 90, and he’s sober, and in his words, he was pursued by grace, and that’s how he got through this.

So in your case, you acquire said, actuality and added places, that you never drank so abundant that you didn’t bethink what happened. But yet, we acquire heard — not beneath oath, but we acquire heard your academy acquaintance say that you did booze frequently. These are in annual reports. That you would sometimes be belligerent. Accession acquaintance said it’s not aboveboard for you to say you didn’t acquire anamnesis lapses. So bubbler is one thing.

KAVANAUGH: I don’t advanced — I — I absolutely don’t advanced that’s — the added quote’s correct. On the aboriginal quote, if you wanted, I provided some actual that’s still redacted about the bearings with the apprentice year roommate, and I don’t absolutely appetite to echo that in a accessible hearing, but aloof so you know, there were three bodies in a room, Dave White, Jamie Roach (ph) and me, and it was a advancing bearings above Jamie did not like Dave White. I was — at all, and I’m in this…

KLOBUCHAR: OK, I — I just…

KAVANAUGH: So Dave — so Dave White came aback from — from home one weekend, and Jamie Roach had abashed all his furniture…

KLOBUCHAR: OK. OK.

KAVANAUGH: … out into the — out into the courtyard.

KLOBUCHAR: OK.

KAVANAUGH: And so he walks in, and so that’s your antecedent on that, so there’s some old…

KLOBUCHAR: OK, so bubbler is one thing.

KAVANAUGH: There — and there’s abundant more. Accessory at the redacted allocation of what I said. I don’t appetite to echo that in a accessible hearing.

KLOBUCHAR: All right. I will. I will.

KAVANAUGH: (inaudible)

KLOBUCHAR: Could I aloof ask one question?

KAVANAUGH: … redacted admonition about that.

KLOBUCHAR: OK. Bubbler is one thing, but the affair is about truthfulness, and in your accounting testimony, you said sometimes you had too abounding drinks. Was there anytime a time aback you drank so abundant that you couldn’t bethink what happened, or allotment of what happened the night before?

KAVANAUGH: No, I — no. I bethink what happened, and I advanced you’ve allegedly had beers, Senator, and — and so I…

KLOBUCHAR: So you’re adage there’s never been a case above you drank so abundant that you didn’t bethink what happened the night before, or allotment of what happened.

KAVANAUGH: It’s — you’re allurement about, you know, blackout. I don’t know. Acquire you?

KLOBUCHAR: Could you acknowledgment the question, Judge? I aloof — so you — that’s not happened. Is that your answer?

KAVANAUGH: Yeah, and I’m ytical if you have.

KLOBUCHAR: I acquire no bubbler problem, Judge.

KAVANAUGH: Yeah, nor do I.

KLOBUCHAR: OK, acknowledge you.

GRASSLEY: Afore I go to Abettor Hatch, aback this FBI affair keeps advancing up all the time, let’s get aback to basics. Aboriginal of all, anybody, including any abettor that’s brought up this issue, could ask for an FBI investigation. What the FBI does is accumulate admonition for the White House, afresh the file’s beatific to the board for us to accomplish our own evaluations. We’re able of authoritative our own assurance about the accurateness of any of those allegations. The FBI has put out a annual over, now I accept it’s a ages ago, acutely advertence this amount is closed, as far as — as the — the letter actuality beatific to them, and there is no federal abomination to investigate.

If Abettor — Senate Democrats accomplishment for the FBI to draw any abstracts on this matter, I’m activity to admonish you what Joe Biden said. Now, I said this my statement, but maybe — maybe bodies aren’t alert aback I say, and maybe they won’t akin apprehend this.

Joe Biden, quote, “The aing actuality who refers to an FBI abode as actuality annual annihilation acutely doesn’t acquire anything. The FBI absolutely does not — does not, in this or any added case, adeptness a conclusion. Period… They say ‘He said, she said, and they said.’ Period. So aback bodies abandon an FBI abode afore you,” or akin accompany it up now as commodity prospectively — I’m not — that wasn’t in his quote, “understand they do not, they do not, they do not adeptness conclusions… they do not accomplish recommendations.”

Senator Hatch.

WHITEHOUSE: Mr. Chairman?

(UNKNOWN): We accusation a break.

HATCH (?): No, don’t booty a break.

WHITEHOUSE: Mr. Chairman?

HATCH (?): Let me do this.

WHITEHOUSE: May I say for the almanac that, actually, we acquire asked? You said that nobody’s asked the FBI, or we could ask the FBI. I absolutely have. I advanced others have. And I advanced that the affair is that allotment of what an FBI abode does…

GRASSLEY: You appetite to booty a breach (ph)?

WHITEHOUSE: … is to investigate and seek either acceptance or exculpatory evidence. It’s not so abundant the cessation that it draws as the above of the affirmation that is accustomed out through the assay and the aberration amid what somebody adeptness say to an FBI abettor aback they’re actuality examined, and for instance Mr. Judge’s letter active by his apostle beatific in. It’s a — it’s aloof a adapted thing.

And I acquire still that this is the aboriginal accomplishments assay in the history of accomplishments investigations that hasn’t been reopened aback new aboveboard aspersing admonition was aloft about the subject, about the nominee. So I, you know, I aloof didn’t appetite to let the point you fabricated angle without…

GRASSLEY: Well, I’ll — I’ll…

WHITEHOUSE: … referencing the — what we had accustomed to do.

GRASSLEY: … Absolution me, but I’ll aloof add to the point you made. The letter was beatific to the FBI. The FBI beatific it to the White Abode with a letter adage the case is closed.

We’re demography a breach now, for abettor — we’re demography a breach now.

(RECESS)

GRASSLEY: Judge, are you ready?

KAVANAUGH: I am ready. And can I say one thing?

GRASSLEY: Yes.

KAVANAUGH: Aloof activity to say I started my aftermost colloquy by adage to Abettor Klobuchar how abundant I annual her and admired what she did at the aftermost hearing. And she asked me a catechism at the end that I responded by allurement her a catechism and I didn’t — sorry, I did that. This is a boxy process. I’m apologetic about that.

KLOBUCHAR: I acknowledge that. I — I would like to add, aback you acquire a ancestor that’s a alcoholic, you’re appealing accurate about drinking.

And — and the added affair is I was absolutely aloof aggravating to get the basal of the facts and the evidence. And I, again, acquire we do that by aperture up the FBI investigation, and I would alarm it a accomplishments assay instead of investigation. Acknowledge you.

KAVANAUGH: Acknowledge that.

GRASSLEY: Abettor Hatch.

HATCH: Well, acknowledge you.

Judge, welcome, we’re blessed to acquire you here. My acquaintance from — I’d aloof like to say a few words — my acquaintance from Arizona emphasized bygone that we acquire afore us today two animal beings, Dr. Ford and Adjudicator Kavanaugh. They deserve — anniversary of you deserves to be brash adequately and respectfully.

We accustomed to do that with Dr. Ford beforehand and I advanced we succeeded. It’s important that we amusement Adjudicator Kavanaugh adequately now. And it charcoal to be aboveboard how that’s activity to assignment out.

Judge Kavanaugh has been a federal adjudicator for 12 years. And he’s been a abundant federal adjudicator on the second-highest cloister in the nation. He’s becoming a acceptability for artlessness and decency. His clerks adulation him. His acceptance he teaches in law academy as well, his acceptance adulation him. His colleagues adulation him. This man is not a monster, nor is he what has been represented actuality in these hearings.

We’re talking today about Adjudicator Kavanaugh’s conduct in aerial academy — and akin then, and as a apprentice in college, I guess, as well. Austere allegations acquire been raised. If Adjudicator Kavanaugh committed animal assault, he should not serve on the Supreme Court; I advanced we’d all accede with that.

HATCH: But the bazaar atmosphere that has been created aback my Democratic colleagues aboriginal leaked Dr. Ford’s allegations to the media two weeks ago — afterwards sitting on them for six weeks, I adeptness add — has brought us the affliction in our politics. It absolutely has brought us no afterpiece to the truth. Bearding belletrist with no name and no acknowledgment abode are now actuality brash as borough news. Porn brilliant attorneys with facially doubtful claims are active the annual cycle.

I abhorrence to say this, but this is worse than Robert Bork, and I didn’t advanced it could get any worse than that. This is worse than Clarence Thomas. I didn’t advanced it could get any worse than that. This is a borough disgrace, the way you’re actuality treated.

And in the boilerplate of it all, we acquire Adjudicator Kavanaugh, a man who until two weeks ago was a colonnade of the accustomed community. There’s been no buzz of delinquency by him in the time he’s been a judge.

What we acquire are uncorroborated, counterfeit claims from his boyish years. Claims that every declared beholder has either denied or bootless to corroborate.

I do not beggarly to abbreviate the calmness of the claims. Yes, they’ve been austere claims, but the chase for accurateness has to absorb added than bald assertions. Like Dr. Ford, Adjudicator Kavanaugh deserves fair treatment. He was an adolescent aerial schooler. So were we all. That he wrote or said brainless things sometimes does not accomplish him a animal predator.

I acquire the annual of my colleagues to breach bottomward this man at any costs. I do acquire it. But let’s at atomic be fair and accessory at the facts or the absence thereof. Guilt by affiliation is wrong. Immaturity does not according criminality. That Adjudicator Kavanaugh drank in aerial academy or academy does not accomplish him accusable of every abhorrent affair that he’s afresh been accused of.

A lifetime of annual and according assay affliction to beggarly commodity aback assessing allegations that are flatly inconsistent with the beforehand of a person’s absolute developed life.

With those comments, Judge, I’d aloof like to ask you a few questions if I can about how — and if you can be abbreviate in your answers, it’d admonition me get through a agglomeration of them — about how this activity has unfolded. Aback did you aboriginal apprentice of Dr. Ford’s allegations adjoin you?

KAVANAUGH: It was a anniversary ago Sunday aback — the Washington Post Story.

HATCH: Isn’t that amazing? Did the baronial affiliate accession these allegations in your one-on-one affair with her aftermost month?

KAVANAUGH: She did not.

HATCH: Did the baronial affiliate accession them at your accessible audition beforehand this month?

KAVANAUGH: No.

HATCH: Did the baronial affiliate accession them at the bankrupt affair that followed the accessible hearing?

KAVANAUGH: She was not there.

HATCH: Did the baronial affiliate or any of her colleagues accession them in the 1,300 accounting questions that were submitted to you afterwards the hearing?

KAVANAUGH: No.

HATCH: Aback was the aboriginal time that the baronial affiliate or her agents asked you about these allegations?

KAVANAUGH: Today.

HATCH: Aback did you aboriginal apprehend of Ms. Ramirez’s allegations adjoin you?

KAVANAUGH: In the aftermost — in the aeon aback then, the New Yorker story.

HATCH: Did the Baronial Affiliate or any of her colleagues or any of their staffs ask you about Ms. Ramirez’s allegations afore they were leaked to the press?

KAVANAUGH: No.

HATCH: Aback was the aboriginal time that the baronial affiliate or any of her colleagues or any of their agents asked you about Ms. Ramirez’s allegations?

KAVANAUGH: Today.

HATCH: I advanced it’s a disgrace, amid you and me.

GRASSLEY: Abettor Coons.

COONS: Acknowledge you, Mr. Chairman. Adjudicator Kavanaugh, today’s audition is about Dr. Ford’s austere allegations about a animal assault. You acquire absolutely denied those claims. But we’re actuality today to appraise her believability and yours, and in our antecedent active exchanges in the antecedent acceptance audition ambit (ph), I — I activate that your answers, at times agilely dedicated but at added times addled me as ambiguous or not aboveboard on key issues. And it’s adjoin that accomplishments that I’m gluttonous to appraise your believability today.

You said in your aperture that aphorism of law bureau demography allegations seriously, and I accede with that. It brings me no joy to catechism you on these capacity today, but I do advanced they’re austere and I advanced they are aces of our attention.

So let me, if I can, acknowledgment to a band of ytic my aide was on before, which was about whether you’ve anytime gotten advancing while bubbler or abandoned an black afterwards drinking.

KAVANAUGH: Those are two adapted questions. I’ve already answered the added one. As to the first, I advanced the acknowledgment to that is basically no. I don’t apperceive absolutely what you beggarly by that, like, what — what are you talking about?

COONS: Well, the — the acumen I…

KAVANAUGH: I guess. I mean, I — I don’t beggarly it that way, but “no” is the basal answer, unless you’re talking about commodity above — that I — I’m not acquainted that you’re activity to ask about.

COONS: The — the acumen I’m asking, we’ve had a actual abrupt aeon of time to counterbalance alfresco affirmation and I’ll accompany my colleagues in adage I ambition we had added affirmation in advanced of us today to weigh. Do you bethink Liz Swisher, a academy acquaintance of castigation from Yale?

KAVANAUGH: First, on your point about the alfresco evidence, you know, all four assemblage said…

COONS: Let — let me focus, I’m aggravating to get this catechism if I (ph) — if I could.

KAVANAUGH: I know, but you fabricated a — you fabricated a point, and I aloof appetite to reemphasize: all four assemblage who were allegedly at the accident acquire said it didn’t happen, including Dr. Ford’s longtime friend, Ms. Keyser, who said she’s never…

COONS: That’s right, and if Mark Adjudicator — if Mark Adjudicator were in advanced of us today to question, we’d be able to appraise his credibility.

KAVANAUGH: But he’s (inaudible)…

COONS: Let me aloof get through — this through if I can, Your Honor. Liz Swisher is a academy classmate. She’s now a medical doctor. And I’m commendation from a contempo annual she gave. She said, Brett Kavanaugh drank added than a lot of people. He’d end up slurring his words, stumbling. It’s not aboveboard for him to say he’s had no anamnesis lapses in the nights he drank to excess. I apperceive because I drank with him.

How should we appraise that adjoin (inaudible)

KAVANAUGH: She afresh goes on, if you — if you kept reading, and says she absolutely can’t point to any specific instance like that.

COONS: The adduce that jumped out at me was, “Brett was a awkward drunk, and I apperceive because I drank with him.” There’s also, in a abstracted setting…

KAVANAUGH: I don’t advanced that — I don’t — I do not advanced that’s a fair characterization, and Chris Dudley’s quoted in that article, and I would accredit you to what Chris Dudley said. I spent added time with Chris Dudley in academy than aloof about anyone, and I would accredit you to what he said.

COONS: In added reporting, as I’m abiding you know, a academy acquaintance declared you as about shy but said that aback you drank you could be advancing or akin belligerent, and your roommate, as I advanced you discussed with Abettor Klobuchar…

KAVANAUGH: (inaudible)

COONS: …said you were frequently drunk. (inaudible)

KAVANAUGH: Yes, and that — and that acquaintance — that was apprentice year roommate.

COONS: Yes.

KAVANAUGH: And there was altercation amid him and the third person. There were three of us in a baby room, and you should accessory at what I said in the redacted allocation of the — of the archetype about him, and you should appraise his believability with that in mind.

COONS: Put yourself in our shoes for a moment if you would, Judge, and I apperceive that’s allurement a lot of you in this setting. But accept you’d gone through a activity to baddest accession for an abundantly important job in a position, you had a lot of able candidates, and as you’re finishing the hiring activity you apprentice of a aboveboard accusation that, if true, would be disqualifying.

Wouldn’t you either booty a footfall aback and conduct a absolute assay or move to a adapted candidate? And why not accede to a one-week abeyance to acquiesce the FBI to investigate all these allegations and acquiesce you an befalling a anniversary from now to acquire the affiliation present in advanced of us for us to appraise their believability and for us to either ablaze your name or dness these allegations by affective to a adapted nominee?

KAVANAUGH: All four assemblage who are declared to be at the accident said it didn’t happen. Including Dr. Ford’s adept friend, Ms. Keyser, who said that she didn’t apperceive me and that she does not anamnesis anytime actuality at a affair with me with or afterwards Dr. Ford.

COONS: What I’ve struggled with, Adjudicator Kavanaugh, is the absence of a fair, federal law administration driven, detached activity to catechism the assorted bodies who I advanced are ytical to this. My concern, should you move forward, is what it will do to the believability of the cloister and how that may able-bodied adhere over your service, I acquire —

KAVANAUGH: Accessory sir, my acceptability has been —

COONS: Your affair about this but I ambition you would accompany us in calling for an FBI assay for one anniversary aback you ablaze or assert some of these allegations.

KAVANAUGH: Aback you say a anniversary delay, you apperceive how connected the aftermost 10 canicule acquire been?

COONS: Allegedly an eternity.

KAVANAUGH: Yes.

COONS: But in the Adjudicator Thomas acceptance audition (ph) —

KAVANAUGH: For us accustomed —

COONS: It was a four day delay.

KAVANAUGH: has been a lifetime. And you know, yes, and it’s been brash and all four assemblage say it didn’t happen. And they’ve said it beneath amends of felony, and I’ve produced my calendars which show, you know, a lot — that’s important affirmation and you act like — I mean, the aftermost 10 canicule I asked for a audition the day afterwards the allegation.

GRASSLEY: Afore I alarm on Abettor Lee, I appetite to accent commodity actuality that talking about accomplishing commodity afterwards a abundant time — we had 45 canicule amid July 30 and September 13, I acquire it is, aback we could acquire been investigating this and in absorption to this applicant if you booty the boilerplate of 65 to 70 canicule amid the time that a actuality is arise by the president, and the Senate votes on it — is about 65 to 70 canicule and actuality we are at about 85 to 90 days.

So there’s affluence of time put in on this nomination. Abettor Lee — oh no, adjournment a minute — I got one added affair I capital to — everybody abroad has been putting belletrist in the record. I acquire a letter actuality from 65 women who knew Adjudicator Kavanaugh amid the years ’79 and ’83 — the years he abounding Georgetown Prep Aerial School.

These women wrote to the board because they apperceive Adjudicator Kavanaugh and they apperceive that the allegations aloft by Dr. Ford are completely, absolutely inconsistent with his character. These 65 women apperceive him through amusing challenge and church, abounding acquire remained aing accompany with him — here’s what they say partly commendation the letter.

“Through the added than 35 years we’ve accustomed him, Brett has stood out for his friendship, appearance and integrity. He has consistently brash women with appropriateness and respect. That was accurate in aerial academy and it charcoal accurate to this day.” In closing they wrote, “Judge Kavanaugh, has consistently been a acceptable person,” so afterwards argument I put it in the almanac — Abettor Lee?

LEE: Adjudicator Kavanaugh, you’ve been accommodating at every date of this assay both your accomplishments assay and the assay conducted by this committee, is that correct?

KAVANAUGH: That is correct, sir.

LEE: It’s additionally actual that you yourself do not ascendancy the FBI or aback it conducts an investigation, you are a nominee, you’re not tasked with the job of chief who, when, whether or how conduct an investigation?

KAVANAUGH: That’s correct.

LEE: But at every moment aback either we or above-mentioned to the board demography administration over it, the FBI has asked you questions — you’ve been alert and you’ve been responsive, isn’t that right?

KAVANAUGH: That is correct, throughout my career.

LEE: I acquire colleagues today who acquire afresh asked for an FBI investigation, and there are some ironies in this. Ironies that arise at atomic two levels. In the aboriginal place, at atomic one of my colleagues — at atomic one of them had admission to this admonition many, abounding weeks afore anyone abroad did — had the adeptness and I acquire the moral assignment and obligation to abode those facts to the FBI, at which point they could acquire and would acquire been brash by the FBI.

And that could acquire been handled in such a way that didn’t about-face this in to a circus. One that has affronted your activity upside down, and that of your ancestors — and the activity of Dr. Ford and her ancestors upside down. I accede this best adverse accustomed that this was absolutely aural the ascendancy of at atomic one of my Democratic colleagues to do this.

The added akin of irony actuality is that while calling afresh for an assay by the FBI, an assay over which you acquire no adeptness to control, by the way — an assay you acquire no ascendancy to alarm for. While calling for an assay we’re in the boilerplate of a chat that involves questions to you.

So I ask my Democratic colleagues, if you acquire questions for Adjudicator Kavanaugh, ask him. He’s adapted here. If that’s absolutely what you appetite is the truth, ask him questions adapted now. If you acquire questions of added witnesses, afresh for the adulation of all that is angelic and angelic — participate in the board investigations that acquire been activity on, as you acquire not been accommodating with the board agents investigating the alfresco witnesses.

If accession absolutely were absorbed in the accurateness this is what they would do. They would participate in the investigation, and aback we acquire a board investigation, a board audition with alive assemblage — they would allocution about that rather than commodity abroad they ambition they were accepting in advanced of them.

If what they appetite is a chase for the truth, afresh now is their choice. If on the added duke what they appetite to do is adjournment this until afterwards the acclamation — which at atomic one of my colleagues on the Democratic ancillary as acknowledged, afresh that adeptness be what they would do. Assuredly I appetite to point out that there is cogent antecedent from our above Administrator of this committee, Administrator Joe Biden.

During the Clarence Thomas hearings, about three decades ago Administrator Biden fabricated some absorbing observations about FBI belletrist and their role in this process. Here’s what he said, “the aing actuality who refers to an FBI abode as actuality annual annihilation — acutely doesn’t acquire anything. The FBI absolutely does not in this, or any added case, adeptness a conclusion. Period. Period.”

Those are his bifold periods, not mine, I accept the quote, “The acumen why we cannot await on the FBI abode — you would not like it if we did, because it is inconclusive,” so aback bodies beachcomber an FBI abode afore you, acquire they do not — they do not — they do not adeptness conclusions. They do not make, as my acquaintance believability out added accurately, they do not accomplish recommendations.

In added words, the role of the FBI is to banderole issues, those issues acquire been flagged. Sadly, in this case they were flagged — not as they should acquire been. Not in the timing in which they should acquire been.

And accordingly they couldn’t acquire been addressed in the abode that would acquire preserved a lot added abode for you, for your ancestors and for Dr. Ford and her family. They were instead captivated out until the final moment. I accede that best unfortunate, and for that, on annual of this committee, I extend to you my best abstruse sympathies and my best abstruse sympathies to Dr. Ford and her ancestors as well.

SASSE: Mr. Chairman, aback we don’t acquire abundant slots for anybody could I acquire the aftermost minute of Abettor Lee, so that Abettor Kennedy can be recognized? Judge, we did 38 hours in accessible with you. Did we acquire any clandestine hearings with you?

KAVANAUGH: Yes.

SASSE: Was that a fun time for you? Aback bodies — Senators could ask questions that are awkward or afflictive about abeyant alcoholism, abeyant bank addiction, acclaim calendar debt, if your buddies floated you money to buy baseball tickets — did you adore that time we absorb in actuality backward one night?

KAVANAUGH: I’m consistently blessed to abet with the committee.

SASSE: That’s charitable. Were you anytime asked about any animal allegations aback we had that time in actuality with you alone?

KAVANAUGH: No.

SASSE: Did the baronial affiliate already acquire these allegations for, I guess, this would acquire been September 6 or 7, and the letter was accounting on July 30th?

A — a advocacy was fabricated by baronial affiliate or her agents to Dr. Ford — and, by the way, I advanced Dr. Ford is a victim, and I advanced she’s been through hell and I’m actual affectionate to her — but, did the baronial member’s staff, did we apprehend today, accomplish a advocacy to appoint a apostle and she knew all that?

And yet we had a audition actuality with you and none of these things were asked. But then, already the activity was closed, already the FBI assay was closed, already we were done affair in accessible and in private, afresh this was sprung on you. I aloof appetite to accomplish abiding I acquire the dates correct, right?

Because we’ve got 35-plus canicule from all the time that this affirmation was in the hands, recommendations were fabricated to an alfresco lawyer. You could acquire handled all this, we could acquire had this chat in private, in a way that didn’t — not abandoned do applesauce to his family, but do all — I crop my time.

KAVANAUGH: Thank…

SASSE: Aggravating to see if he could do algebraic about 35 days. That was a little bit of a question.

KAVANAUGH: … Acknowledge you.

GRASSLEY: (OFF-MIKE) Abettor Blumenthal.

BLUMENTHAL: Thanks, Mr. Chairman.

Good afternoon, Adjudicator Kavanaugh. As a federal judge, you’re acquainted of the board apprenticeship falsus in — in unibus (sic), falsus in omnibus, are you not? You’re acquainted of that board instruction?

KAVANAUGH: Yes, I’m — I am.

BLUMENTHAL: You apperceive what it means?

KAVANAUGH: You can construe it for me, senator. You can do it bigger than I can.

BLUMENTHAL: Apocryphal in one thing, apocryphal in everything. Acceptation in board instructions that we — some of us as prosecutors acquire heard abounding times, is — told the board that they can discount a attestant if they acquisition them to be apocryphal in one thing.

So the amount of why we’re actuality today absolutely is credibility. Let me talk…

KAVANAUGH: But (ph) the amount of why we’re actuality is an accusation for which the four assemblage present acquire all said it didn’t happen.

BLUMENTHAL: Let me ask you about Renate Dolphin who lives in Connecticut. She anticipation these annual statements were, quote, “Horrible, aching and artlessly untrue.” end quote, because Renate Alum acutely adumbrated some avowal of animal conquest. And that’s the acumen that you apologized to her, correct?

KAVANAUGH: That’s false, speaking about the annual and she — she said she and I never had any animal interaction. So your question…

BLUMENTHAL: But…

KAVANAUGH: … your catechism is apocryphal and I’ve addressed that in the aperture statement. And so, your catechism is based on a apocryphal apriorism and absolutely does abundant corruption to her. I don’t apperceive why you’re bringing this up, frankly, accomplishing abundant corruption to her. By akin bringing her name up actuality is absolutely unfortunate.

BLUMENTHAL: Well, calling accession an alum in that way, was absolutely interpreted…

KAVANAUGH: Well, implying what you’re implying what you’re implying about…

BLUMENTHAL: … by a cardinal of your football accompany at the time of boasting of animal conquest. That’s the acumen that I’m bringing it up. And it conflicts…

KAVANAUGH: Yes. No, it’s false.

BLUMENTHAL: … with…

KAVANAUGH: You’re implying that. Accessory what you’re bringing up adapted now about her. Accessory what you’re doing.

BLUMENTHAL: … Mr. Chairman, I ask that…

KAVANAUGH: Don’t accompany her name up.

BLUMENTHAL: … these interruptions not be subtracted from my time.

GRASSLEY: Actual able-bodied (ph). Ask your catechism and afresh let…

KAVANAUGH: She’s a abundant person. She’s consistently been a abundant person. We never had any animal interaction. By bringing this up, you’re aloof — aloof boring her through the mud. It’s aloof unnecessary.

GRASSLEY: Proceed, Abettor Blumenthal (ph).

BLUMENTHAL: Acknowledge you, Mr. Chairman.

You’ve fabricated reference, judge, to a affidavit annual I acquire by Mark Adjudicator to the committee. Is that correct?

KAVANAUGH: I fabricated advertence to what Mark Judge’s apostle beatific to the committee.

BLUMENTHAL: You apperceive (ph), it’s not a affidavit statement, is it?

KAVANAUGH: It would — beneath amends of felony.

BLUMENTHAL: Well, it’s a annual active by his lawyer, Barbara Van Gelder. It is six abrupt and conclusory sentences. Are you adage that that is a acting for an assay by the FBI or some annual by the FBI beneath oath?

KAVANAUGH: Beneath amends of felony, he said that this affectionate of accident didn’t arise and that I never did or would acquire done commodity like that. And…

BLUMENTHAL: As a federal judge, you consistently appetite the best affirmation don’t you?

KAVANAUGH: … Senator, he has said and all the assemblage present — accessory at Ms. Keyser’s statement, she’s

BLUMENTHAL: Let me…

KAVANAUGH: Dr. Ford’s longtime friend…

BLUMENTHAL: … let me move on to accession topic. You’ve testified to this board this morning — this afternoon, quote, “This accomplished two-week accomplishment has been a afflicted and orrated political hit, fueled with aboveboard pent-up acrimony about Admiral Trump and the 2016 election, abhorrence that has been unfairly stoked about my authoritative record, acrimony on annual of the Clintons and millions of dollars in money from alfresco left-wing activity groups.”

Is it your affidavit that the activity of the adventuresome woman who sat above you did aloof a abbreviate time ago was acrimony on annual of a left-wing cabal or the Clintons?

KAVANAUGH: Senator, I said in my aperture annual that she adopted confidentially. And her confidentially was — was destroyed by the accomplishments of this committee.

BLUMENTHAL: Let me ask you this, in a accent that you gave at Yale you — you described, quote, “Falling out of the bus assimilate the advanced accomplish of the Yale Law Academy at 4:45 a.m.” and…

KAVANAUGH: I wasn’t…

BLUMENTHAL: … then…

KAVANAUGH: … I wasn’t anecdotic me. I organized…

BLUMENTHAL: … aggravating to…

KAVANAUGH: … Senator. Senator, let me finish, please. I organized a third-year end of academy affair for 30 of my classmates to hire a bus to go to Fenway Park in Boston, which was about a three-hour trip.

I bought all the tickets. You and I acquire discussed that before. I bought all the baseball tickets. I busy the bus. I organized the accomplished trip.

We went to Fenway Park. Roger Clemens was casting for the Red Sox. We had a abundant time. George Brett was amphitheatre third abject for the Royals — actually, he was amphitheatre larboard acreage that night. And he — and we went to the game, and got back, and afresh we went out. It was a abundant night of friendship.

BLUMENTHAL: I — I apologize for interrupting, judge, but I accusation to accomplishment the adduce afore I ask you the question…

KAVANAUGH: I wasn’t talking about…

BLUMENTHAL: … The adduce ends…

GRASSLEY: OK, we’ll let (ph)…

BLUMENTHAL: … the adduce ends that you accustomed to, quote, “piece things aback together,” end quote, to anamnesis what happened that night. Meaning…

KAVANAUGH: I apperceive what happened.

BLUMENTHAL: … Well, you…

GRASSLEY: Judge, let — will you bound acknowledgment your question? And afresh I’m activity to let him acknowledgment you…

KAVANAUGH: I apperceive what — I apperceive what happened that night.

BLUMENTHAL: I’ll accomplishment allurement my question…

GRASSLEY: Please, go ahead…

BLUMENTHAL: … your annual (ph).

GRASSLEY: … but do it quickly.

BLUMENTHAL: Doesn’t that betoken to you that you had to allotment things aback together, you had to ask others what happened that night?

KAVANAUGH: No, it…

GRASSLEY: OK. You — you booty your time now and acknowledgment the question.

KAVANAUGH: … Yes.

GRASSLEY: And then, Abettor Crapo.

KAVANAUGH: Absolutely not. I apperceive absolutely what happened that night. It was a abundant night of fun. I was so blessed that — it was abundant camaraderie. Anybody looks aback affectionately on the cruise to Fenway Park. And afresh we went out together, a accumulation of classmates. And I apperceive absolutely what happened the accomplished night. And I’m happy.

BLUMENTHAL: Judge, do you — do you acquire Anita Hill?

GRASSLEY: Abettor — Abettor Crapo.

GRAHAM?: (OFF-MIKE) Time is up (ph). Your time is up (ph).

GRASSLEY: Abettor Crapo.

CRAPO: Acknowledge you, Mr. Chairman.

And Adjudicator Kavanaugh, first, I appetite to get into this accomplished catechism that’s been bandied aback and alternating here, about endlessly today, about the FBI assay process.

Because I advanced it’s — I appetite to hunt up a little bit on what Abettor Lee and Abettor Sasse acquire referenced.

There’s been a lot of allocution actuality about, “We accusation an FBI investigation.” In these processes, which you’ve been through a cardinal of times now, aback the FBI does a accomplishments assay with absorption to a nomination, could you bound alarm that for us? What does the FBI do?

KAVANAUGH: The FBI gathers statements from bodies who acquire information. They don’t dness credibility, they accumulate the admonition and the believability assurance is fabricated by the ultimate fact-finder, which in this case is the United States Senate.

The committee, of course, hears aggregate evidence.

CRAPO: And the FBI afresh gives that abode to the White House, if I acquire it? And the White Abode afresh transfers it to the Senate? Is that the — the…

(CROSSTALK)

KAVANAUGH: That’s my understanding, yes.

CRAPO: … control? And as you indicated, it does not do afresh — it’s been said abounding times actuality today. The FBI does not accomplish judgments, it gives the Senate board information.

At that point in time, if I acquire the activity correctly, the Senate — the United States Senate Attorneys Board — has accustomed authorities. If it receives admonition in an FBI abode that it wants to added investigate, the Senate has accustomed ascendancy to conduct a added investigation. Is that correct?

KAVANAUGH: That’s my understanding.

CRAPO: And that is what has been referenced actuality abounding times, about — how some of these assemblage that were articular in the actual backward admonition that we received, acquire fabricated statements that are beneath amends of felony. That’s a abomination for lying to the Senate Attorneys Committee.

And as I acquire it, what happens is, the Senate Attorneys Committee, which has ascendancy beneath law to conduct those kinds of investigations, follows up on the FBI belletrist to accomplishment out the assay that it wants with absorption to any admonition that it receives that needs added investigation. Is that your compassionate of the process?

KAVANAUGH: That’s my understanding, Senator.

CRAPO: Now in this case, there’s been a lot of allocution actuality today — and if I acquire time, I’ll get into it. It looks like I’ll run out of time — but in this case, there’s a lot of affair by abounding that there was not so abundant an absorption in an FBI assay as there was in delay.

I’m not activity to get to that unless I acquire time. I appetite to allocution about what happened in the Senate committee’s investigation. Because as I acquire it — and this may be added of a catechism to the administrator — as anon as we accustomed information, which was about 45 canicule afterwards others on the board accustomed it, we conducted an investigation.

Is that correct, Mr. Chairman? I’m apologetic to about-face the ytic to you, but we began that accustomed Senate Attorneys Board investigation.

GRASSLEY: Yes.

CRAPO: And that assay complex our absolutely accurately enabled board to conduct an investigation. And if I acquire it correctly, the Democratic associates of the board banned to participate in that investigation.

GRASSLEY: Yes.

CRAPO: And so we acquire conducted the investigation. The actual kinds of things that my colleagues on the added ancillary are allurement that we acquaint the FBI to do, this board has the ascendancy to do it and this board does it, and this board has done it.

Now there may be added demands for added interviews and added investigation. But aback you, Adjudicator Kavanaugh, acquire referenced the affidavit that has arise from those who were declared — who were articular as — as actuality at this event, the affidavit that has been accustomed from them is admonition that has been accustomed pursuant to a Senate board investigation.

And I aloof advanced it should be fabricated clear. I advanced there’s been a lot of aback and alternating actuality about, “Oh, we’re not accepting information, we’re not attractive at this. You don’t appetite to accessory into the investigation, you don’t appetite to see what happened.”

The absoluteness is that this board anon and thoroughly brash every attestant that has been articular to us. And we acquire statements beneath amends of abomination from them.

So I aloof appetite to achieve with that. I got 45 abnormal left, so I’m gonna aloof ask you one quick question. Again, on timing.

You had a affair with Abettor Feinstein on August 20th?

KAVANAUGH: It’s my understanding, yeah. Able-bodied — I had a meeting, and that’s my compassionate of the date.

CRAPO: Of the date, yes. What was accustomed beforehand in affidavit actuality today was that the baronial member’s agents helped to — helped Dr. Ford to absorb the Katz law aing on — ancient amid August — or July 30th and August 7th.

So I aloof capital you to yze one added time. In the affair that you had two weeks or added later, this affair was not aloft with you?

(CROSSTALK)

KAVANAUGH: The affair was not raised.

CRAPO: All right. Acknowledge you. My time is up.

GRASSLEY: We’ll booty a five-minute breach now.

(RECESS)

GRASSLEY: Hirono.

HIRONO: Acknowledge you, Mr. Chairman. Adjudicator Kavanaugh, my colleagues on the added ancillary are accusing the democrats of some array of political conspiracy, but that’s because they appetite us to abstract – they appetite to abstract us from what happened actuality this morning.

And what happened actuality this morning was that we heard from Dr. Christine Ford, who batten to us, with quiet, raw, affecting power, about what happened to her. She said she was 100 percent assertive that it was you who attacked her.

And she explained how she came forward, how she struggled with her decision, how she capital the admiral to apperceive so that he could accomplish a bigger choice. So aback you and my colleagues on the added allege us of ambushing you with apocryphal charges, I advanced we all acquire to bethink Dr. Ford’s affidavit and her courage.

Let me go aback to commodity you aloof said in your opening. You said you thought, at your aboriginal hearing, the democrats were an embarrassment. We asked you a lot of questions in those days, and which of our questions do you advanced were an embarrassment?

I asked you about dissents you had accounting as a judge, an amicus abrupt you wrote as a apostle and your adeptness of animal aggravation and corruption by your aing acquaintance and mentor, Alex Kozinski, all accurate questions in the setting. They are accurate because this is a job annual for one of the best important positions of assurance in this country.

And earlier, you agreed that this activity of admonition and accord is absolutely a job interview, absolutely not a bent trial. There’s absolutely no alms for you to be accustomed to the Supreme Court. Our credibility, appearance and artlessness of a nominee, things for us accede in your job interview?

KAVANAUGH: I advanced my accomplished activity is accountable to consideration.

HIRONO: Is that yes? Credibility, appearance and artlessness …

KAVANAUGH: My accomplished activity …

HIRONO: … are those specific ancestry that would be of absorption to us, as we accede putting you, for life, on the accomplished cloister in the country? Credibility, appearance and candor.

KAVANAUGH: Of course. And as allotment of my accomplished activity …

HIRONO: Acknowledge you. Is attitude additionally an important affection for us to consider?

KAVANAUGH: For 12 years, anybody who has appeared afore me on the D.C. Ambit has accepted my authoritative temperament. That’s why I acquire the able-bodied unanimous, able-bodied able appraisement from the American Bar Affiliation and all of the bodies who acquire appeared afore you…

HIRONO: So you accede that attitude is additionally an important bureau for …

KAVANAUGH: Yes. And the federal accessible defender, who testified to the committee, talked about how I had – was consistently advanced and how I disqualified in favor of abhorred defendants, how I was fair-minded. I think, universally, attorneys who’ve appeared afore the D.C. …

HIRONO: So the acknowledgment is yes. I am active out of time. You know, we abandoned bristles minutes, so let me get to commodity else. In your Fox Annual interview, you said that you, quote, “always brash women with abode and respect,” end quote, and that in aerial academy you never, quote, “drank so abundant that you couldn’t bethink what happened the night before.” Would you say the aforementioned affair about your academy life?

KAVANAUGH: Yes.

HIRONO: So I’d like to apprehend your statements from bodies who knew you in college. And as …

KAVANAUGH: Can I say one thing?

HIRONO: … Abettor Coons acclaimed …

KAVANAUGH: OK.

HIRONO: … that James Roche said, your roommate, “Although Brett was commonly reserved, he was a conspicuously abundant drinker, akin by the standards of the time. And he became advancing and advancing aback he was drunk.” So is your above academy acquaintance lying?

KAVANAUGH: I would accredit you to what I said in the closed or redacted allocation about his accord with the added two roommates, and I’m activity to leave it at that. I will say – Senator, you were allurement about college.

I got into Yale Law School. That’s the cardinal one law academy in the country. I had no access there. I got there by busting my appendage in college.

HIRONO: I feel insulted, as a Georgetown graduate.

(LAUGHTER)

KAVANAUGH: Alibi me?

HIRONO: But go on.

KAVANAUGH: I’m sorry. It’s ranked cardinal one, that doesn’t beggarly it’s cardinal one.

(LAUGHTER)

KAVANAUGH: And you know, in academy – two things. A, I studied. I was in cross-campus library every night, and B, I played basketball for the inferior varsity. I accustomed out for the varsity. The aboriginal day I accustomed on campus, we had captain’s workouts.

I played basketball everyday, all throughout – and afresh as anon as the division was over, in backward February, captain’s workouts started again. I was bedeviled with actuality …

HIRONO: So you were not …

KAVANAUGH: … the best basketball player.

HIRONO: I abandoned acquire 23 seconds. So you were not a “sloppy drunk,” and so, your acquaintance was lying.

KAVANAUGH: I will accredit you – I will accredit you, again, to the redacted portion. I’ll say, accessory at my bookish record, and I don’t usually to allocution about myself this way, but in acknowledgment to your – you know, I – I – I formed actual adamantine in college, in my studies, and I additionally played basketball, I did sports and I additionally did socialize.

HIRONO: OK, wait. Alibi me. I apperceive that the administrator is activity to stop me, but I do acquire some added references from bodies who knew you, who say that you were not the basal (inaudible) …

GRASSLEY: Your – your time is up.

HIRONO: … but – ascendancy on. I’m sorry, Mr. Chairman.

GRASSLEY: Abettor – Abettor Tillis.

HIRONO: I would like to – Mr. Chairman, OK, I’ll adjournment until we accomplishment because I aloof appetite to admission some belletrist into the record.

GRASSLEY: Oh, yes. I wasn’t …

HIRONO: Could I do that?

GRASSLEY: … ablaze that’s what you were doing.

HIRONO: It’s not a question. I could go on. But Mr. Chairman, I’d like to admission into the almanac four belletrist – one is, anachronous September 18, 2018, to you, from all of the democrats on this committee, accession is – accession is a letter, anachronous September 18, to Christopher Wray, the administrator of the FBI and Don McGahn, board to the president, active by all the democrats on this committee, a September 21 letter active by Chuck Schumer and Dianne Feinstein to the president, and a September 26 letter active by all the democrats on this committee, all requesting an FBI assay because you did say all we acquire to do is ask.

And the association actuality that if we ask, an assay will arise and it absolutely has not happened. Acknowledge you, Mr. Chairman.

GRASSLEY: Afterwards objection, that will be included. Abettor Tillis.

TILLIS: Acknowledge you, Mr. Chairman. Adjudicator Kavanaugh, acknowledge you afresh for actuality here. And I apologize for what you’re activity through adapted now. I can’t brainstorm it. I’ve gone through a advance and had a lot of smears, but it pales in allegory to what you’ve had to accord with.

I advanced one affair – one point that I’d like to make, from the onset. If we go aback and assay how this board processes work, we’ve got a lot of assignment to do. We’ve had associates booty it on themselves to absolution board arcane abstracts instead of apropos the process.

We’ve had an accusation captivated for about seven weeks that would’ve accustomed us affluence of time to investigate, and afresh aback we assuredly got the information, I allure everybody, decidedly the American public, there is an assay activity on. And a lot of it’s been documented.

There’s a calendar on the website that says that anniversary and every time an accusation was made, the agents followed up on it. And sadly, in several adapted instances, the democrats beneath to participate. They listened in on at atomic one annual with you, didn’t ask a distinct question.

If they capital to acquisition added leads and added things to do, why not ask, if you’re absolutely aggravating to get to the facts, if you’re absolutely aggravating to do your job to investigate? We’re investigating, it’s our job. I advanced in acknowledgment to the baronial member’s questions that Adjudicator Kavanaugh said, “I’m here, you’re allurement me questions.” But you apperceive what?

When the board staff, I assume, directed by the baronial affiliate says, no, we’re not activity to ask questions to Adjudicator Kavanaugh aback he capital to arise in and ablaze his acceptable name.

What are you absolutely after? You may not be afterwards the truth, maybe you are. Maybe you’re afterwards active some array of a political agenda. Maybe it’s a mix of both.

But I advanced you’ve been brash unfairly and I’m abashed that afterwards 32-hours of testimony, one and a bisected hours I sat in the room, that none of these questions came up aback it was all absolutely known. Lawyered up, as a amount of fact.

I additionally appetite to go aback to the comments this morning. I advanced I heard — and we can go aback to the almanac if accession disagrees with me — I advanced I heard Dr. — Dr. Ford say that she wasn’t acquainted of the actuality that we said we’d arise to California. We’d accomplish it confidential. We’ll absolutely depose and ask any questions you appetite to.

I advanced I heard her say she wasn’t acquainted of that. I don’t apperceive above that came with admonition (ph) or whether admonition aloof alone to acquaint her — her counsel.

But the actuality of the amount is that activity was out there. We were affective heaven and apple and akin affective the calendar to get to the calendar to get to the truth. We’re accomplishing an investigation. We’re accomplishing our akin best.

I accomplishment that the American bodies who are watching this will go out to the Senate Attorneys website and booty a accessory at this chronology. Booty a accessory at the abridgement of assay on the allotment of the bodies who appetite the investigation. It doesn’t accomplish a lot of sense.

Every befalling you acquire to go and catechism a witness. Every befalling that we’ve had to acquisition added truth, to acquisition added facts, we’ve done it. It’s documented. We’ve got affidavit statements. We’re accomplishing our job. We’re accomplishing the board work.

Judge Kavanaugh, I additionally acquire to say I acquire you’re a allotment of — you’re — you’re the aboriginal above ambition of a new action that’s developed here. And I advanced you’re right. I advanced it’s aloof basically attack, attack, attack. It’s not admonish and consent; it’s chase and destroy.

And maybe one of the best affirmation of this is one of the websites — one of the groups that are out there, advancing you and aggravating to actualize fodder and all of these red herrings, has already acquired a URL for the aing adjudicator that they’re activity to attack.

URL’s adapted here. They’ve already purchased it. They’re accessible to go. This is the playbook. This is the way we’re activity to run this board from this point forward? Booty a accessory at it. I’ll — I’ll accomplish abiding we get it out on our website.

We’ve already got a stop accession adjudicator who hasn’t been nominated URL, from the aforementioned bodies that are aggravating to activate bodies to beforehand you. There are some bodies actuality who may aboveboard acquire concerns.

I would acquaint you to batter the table with your baronial affiliate and the administration on your ancillary to say: why didn’t we ask questions? Why did we acquire in and differ? Why didn’t we do our allotment of the assay while this baton did aggregate he could to board Dr. Ford and to run bottomward every distinct beforehand that’s been presented to us weeks afterwards it was accustomed to the minority?

I accessory advanced to acknowledging your conformation. I acquire that you’re activity to be on the bench. You apperceive as Abettor Cornyn said, these are allegations that can be pursued through the courts if they absolutely acceleration to a akin to above they can be prosecuted. And everybody on the added ancillary of this belvedere knows that that’s not activity to happen.

GRASSLEY: Abettor Booker.

BOOKER: Adjudicator Kavanaugh, you drank on weekdays as able-bodied in aerial school, not aloof weekends. Is that correct?

KAVANAUGH: Weekdays?

BOOKER: Yes, sir.

KAVANAUGH: I’d say that’s rare. Are you talking about during the academy year?

BOOKER: I’m — I’m talking about the calendars that you provided during these dates.

KAVANAUGH: Oh, that’s in the — in the summer afterwards a football assignment out aback we went over to…

BOOKER: You drank on weekdays, yes or no, sir?

KAVANAUGH: … In the summer aback we went over to Timmy’s abode (ph) on July 1st, that would indicate, yes.

BOOKER: Yes, in added words, that — that July 1st advertence to skis — went over for skis — that’s brewskis, correct?

KAVANAUGH: And afterwards Tobin’s (ph)…

BOOKER: Sir — sir, I aloof accusation a yes or no. That — brewskis, right?

KAVANAUGH: … Well, I accusation to explain context.

BOOKER: You aloof said sir that you drank on weekdays. That’s all I was attractive for.

KAVANAUGH: Well, no, that’s — you’re…

BOOKER: If I may — if I may ask — if I may ask the aing question, sir? You said acutely on the record, I aloof appetite you to recapitulate it that you never in your life, afterwards bubbler heavily to the point of throwing up — and, again, you said you had a anemic abdomen — you said you never had gaps in memories. Never had any loses what so ever. Never had blurred bond about what happened. Is that correct, sir, yes or no?

KAVANAUGH: … That’s — that’s what I said.

BOOKER: OK. Sir, you additionally said that this accomplished two anniversary — this accomplished two weeks has been a two-week accomplishment afflicted and orrated as a political hit.

Are you adage that Dr. Ford’s efforts to arise forward, to adapt for the actual difficult affidavit she gave today, to biking to Washington, D.C. and acquaint us about her experience, acquire all been allotment of an orrated political hit? And — and are you basically calling her some affectionate of political operative?

KAVANAUGH: I’ve — I’ve said my ancestors has no ill will adjoin Dr. Ford. She capital confidentiality. Her acquaintance was absolute by the accomplishments of this committee. And it’s acquired — it’s affronted this into a circus…

BOOKER: So sir, let’s aloof be clear. In added words, your — your — you acquire problems with the senators that are up actuality and how we conducted it; but, you’re not adage in any way that she is a political pawn, political operative. You acquire accord for her. She is talking about a animal assault. Is that correct?

KAVANAUGH: … I said all allegations should be taken seriously, should acquire to both sides…

BOOKER: OK. Do you — do you — do you wish…

KAVANAUGH: … My ancestors has no ill will adjoin her.

BOOKER: … Acknowledge you, sir. Do you ambition that she never came forward?

KAVANAUGH: Senator, I did not do this. The witnesses…

BOOKER: That — that’s not my question, sir. Could you try to acknowledgment my question, sir? Do you ambition she never came forward?

KAVANAUGH: … The assemblage who were there say it didn’t happen.

BOOKER: OK, sir. Do you ambition she would’ve aloof remained bashful then?

KAVANAUGH: I ambition — the assemblage who were there say it didn’t happen. All allegations should be taken seriously.

BOOKER: So — so akin if it’s in the final canicule — canicule afore a vote, if accession has a aboveboard accusation of acquaintance that they captivated for a connected time, that actuality should be accustomed to arise forward. And in fact, as she said, it was her borough duty. You’re not ytic her adroitness of borough assignment are you?

KAVANAUGH: She did arise advanced and afresh the — afresh the — it was…

BOOKER: I apperceive you acquire a lot of political animus, you’ve declared it actual acutely arise my colleagues and I on this panel. What I — what I’m aggravating to get to the basal of is you — you do not see her, specifically, as allotment of an orrated event…

KAVANAUGH: I…

BOOKER: … she’s not a political pawn.

KAVANAUGH: … I don’t apperceive her. But I’ve additionally said that we buck no ill will adjoin her. She capital confidentiality. This could acquire been handled…

BOOKER: And — and — and I understand. But she came forward. She took a abundant extent…

KAVANAUGH: Yes.

BOOKER: … Your ancestors has gone through hell. Her ancestors has gone through hell. She sat here, she told her truth. And — and you fabricated the accusation that she was ogous it. I do not advanced she was ogous with her therapist…

KAVANAUGH: I — I did not say that — that’s…

BOOKER: … You said — I’m sorry. So you said that others were authoritative a coordinated…

KAVANAUGH: … Accommodating by bodies in this room.

BOOKER: … Forgive me. You were talking about us and not her. So she was not — she was not accomplishing this for a political accomplishment in 2012 aback talked to her therapist about this attack. She was not ogous about this aching — aback she fabricated — aching acquaintance aback she fabricated revelations to her husband.

She did alike in 2013, ’16, 2017, afore you were akin nominated aback she appear that it was you — with three adapted bodies — that had sexually assaulted her. That wasn’t coordination. And (inaudible)…

KAVANAUGH: All the assemblage who were there say it didn’t happen. Ms. Keyser’s her longtime friend, said she never saw me at a affair with or afterwards Dr. Ford…

BOOKER: Sir — sir, and Ms. Keyser has said clearly, and I will adduce what she said, she said she does not bethink the night in catechism that — that — that supports what you said. But she additionally says that she believes Dr. Ford.

And so my — my aide Lindsey Graham, who I — I respect, and acquire annual to and has been a accomplice of mine. He said voting no would be legitimizing the best abject affair in American politics.

Do you advanced that bodies who acquire Dr. Ford are — are legitimizing abject things? Those of us who advanced she’s a aboveboard witness, the allegations adjoin her (ph) are credible. Do you advanced that somehow we are agreeable in commodity that’s despicable?

KAVANAUGH: Senator, I — I say acquire to both abandon afore you accomplish a bottom-line conclusion. And accessory at the…

BOOKER: That is fair.

KAVANAUGH: Accessory at the…

BOOKER: I — I acquire 10 abnormal left, sir. You can acknowledgment afterwards I finish, I acquire 10 abnormal left. That is fair. Acquire to both sides, this is not about somebody — one ancillary actuality despicable, the added ancillary not.

Listen to both sides. She was a aboveboard — I’m — I’m — let me accomplishment my question, you can acknowledgment — she — she gave credible, allusive testimony, a woman who had the adventuresomeness to arise advanced and acquaint her truth, sir.

And — and that’s what I’m aloof allurement you, is say she is not a political pawn. She is not orrating, she is not allotment of the Clinton’s efforts to get some affectionate of revenge. She is a woman who came actuality with acceptance affirmation to acquaint her truth.

KAVANAUGH: Is that a question?

BOOKER: No, sir. It was a final statement.

GRASSLEY: Abettor Cruz…

BOOKER: Aloof on one thing, Mr. Chairman…

GRASSLEY: Yes.

BOOKER: That the affirmation is not corroborated at the time. The assemblage who are there say it didn’t happen.

GRASSLEY: Abettor Cruz.

CRUZ: Acknowledge you, Mr. Chairman. Adjudicator Kavanaugh, you and your ancestors acquire been brash abundantly ailing by Senate Democrats and by the media. And let me say additionally I advanced Dr. Ford and her ancestors acquire been brash abundantly ailing by Senate Democrats and the media.

You acquire both aboveboard your acceptable names abject through the mud. And this has been acutely one of the best abject capacity in the history of the United States Senate. Let me say to you and your family, acknowledge you for a lifetime of accessible service.

I will say watching your mother’s afflicted face has been heart-wrenching as she’s aboveboard her son’s appearance abject through the mud afterwards not abandoned your lifetime of accessible annual but her lifetime of accessible annual as well.

And I apperceive as a father, there’s been annihilation added aching to you afresh talking to your daughters and acknowledgment these attacks that the media is airing. I additionally acquire admitting that the American bodies are fair absent people, that the American bodies can set a the accessory warfare of Washington and accessory to actuality and facts. And that is the accusation of this committee.

Now there acquire been three adapted sets of allegations that acquire bedeviled the media.

I advanced it’s important to calendar that two of those sets of allegations had so little acceptance that akin the New York Times, which is no bourgeois outlet, banned to abode on them because they could acquisition no abject for them.

And it was arresting in this absolute audition that not a distinct Democrat in this board asked about two sets of those allegations, Ms. Ramirez’s allegations and the allegations of the applicant of Mr. Avenatti, not a distinct Democrat.

I don’t apperceive if they were aloof too embarrassed. Mr. Avenatti’s allegations were s atrocious that the baronial affiliate bare his client’s best atrocious accusations of you as a bent administrator essentially, bare those atrocious accusations from a statement.

This audition has focused accurately so on the allegations Dr. Ford presented. And let me say, I advanced the board did the adapted affair in giving Dr. Ford a abounding and fair befalling to acquaint her story. That’s what we bald to do aback these allegations became public.

And the board brash her with respect, as we should. I do not acquire Senate Democrats acquire brash you with respect. What do we know? We apperceive that her affidavit and your affidavit are in conflict.

A candid adjudicator of facts would afresh accessory to, “What abroad do we apperceive aback you acquire adverse testimony?” Able-bodied we apperceive that Dr. Ford articular three actuality assemblage who she said empiric what occurred. All three of those actuality assemblage acquire declared on the almanac beneath amends of canard that they do not anamnesis what she is alleging happening.

They acquire not abandoned not — not corroborated her charges, they acquire absolutely refuted her charges. That’s cogent to a candid actuality finder.

In addition, you’ve absolved through afore this board your calendars from the time. Now I will say you were a abundant added organized jailbait than I was and than abounding of us were, but it was a acute address of night-by-night-by-night above you were in the summer of 1982. That is yet accession ancillary allotment of actuality to appraise what happened.

And we additionally apperceive that the Democrats on this board affianced in a greatly arbitrary process. The baronial affiliate had these allegations on July 30th and for 60 canicule — that was 60 canicule ago — the baronial affiliate did not accredit it to the FBI for an investigation. The baronial affiliate did not accredit it to the abounding board for an investigation. The baronial affiliate — this board could acquire brash those claims in a arcane way that admired Dr. Ford’s privacy.

And some of the best cogent affidavit we heard this morning is Dr. Ford told this board that the abandoned bodies to whom she gave her letter were her attorneys, the baronial member, and her affiliate of Congress. And she declared that she and her attorneys did not absolution the letter, which bureau the abandoned bodies that could acquire arise that — that letter were either the baronial affiliate and her agents or the Democratic affiliate of Congress, because Dr. Ford told this board those are the abandoned bodies who had it.

That is not a fair activity and we should accessory to the facts, not bearding allusion and slander.

FEINSTEIN: Mr. Chairman, I ask for a point of claimed advantage to respond.

GRASSLEY: Proceed.

FEINSTEIN: Mr. Chairman, let me be clear: I did not adumbrate Dr. Ford’s allegations. I did not aperture her story. She asked me to ascendancy it arcane and I kept it arcane as she asked. She allegedly was stalked by the press, acquainted that what happened — she was afflicted to arise forward, and her greatest abhorrence were accomplished — was realized. She’s been harassed, she’s had afterlife threats, and she’s had to abscond her home.

In a — in addition, the assay that the Republican majority is heralding is absolutely annihilation that I apperceive about added than a accessory practice. Commonly all the assemblage would be interviewed. However, that’s not happened. While the majority has accomplished out to several people, they did not acquaint me or my agents that they were accomplishing this, and so to altercate that we would not participate but not acquaint us what they were up to is somewhat disingenuous.

I was accustomed some admonition by a woman who was actual abundant afraid, who asked that it be captivated arcane and I captivated it arcane until she absitively that she would arise forward.

CORNYN: Mr. Chairman, would — would the baronial affiliate acknowledgment a question, please?

FEINSTEIN: If I can.

CORNYN: I — I acquire abundant annual for Abettor Feinstein. We’ve formed calm on abounding topics, and I acquire what you aloof said. Can you acquaint us that your agents did not aperture it?

FEINSTEIN: Oh, I don’t acquire my agents would aperture it. I acquire not asked that catechism directly, but I do not acquire they would.

CORNYN: You — you — you apperceive that? I mean, how in the apple could that get in the easily of the — of the columnist unless…

FEINSTEIN: The acknowledgment is no. The agents said they did not (ph).

CORNYN: Acquire you — acquire you asked you — acquire you asked your agents or added staffers on the Attorneys Committee?

FEINSTEIN: I aloof did. They — they — absolution me?

(UNKNOWN): You’ve asked me before.

FEINSTEIN: Well, Jennifer (ph) reminds me I’ve asked her afore about it, and that’s true.

CORNYN: Able-bodied accession — able-bodied somebody leaked it. If it wasn’t you…

FEINSTEIN: Able-bodied it was — I — I’m cogent you, it was not — I did not. I mean, I was asked to accumulate it confidential, and — and I’m criticized for that too.

CRUZ: Mr. Chairman, could I ask the administrator a question? Which is does the board acquire a process, if there is an accusation adjoin any nominee, to appraise that accusation in a arcane arrangement rather than in the accessible — aback Dr. Ford requested that it be kept confidential, is there a activity for the board for because arcane allegations?

GRASSLEY: Yes. Yes it’s — and the acknowledgment is yes, and I beatific — Abettor Tillis acicular out the certificate that I put out to appearance of all the things that we’ve done alternating the curve of your question.

CRUZ: And Mr. Chairman, what would you acquire done if, on July 30th, the baronial affiliate had — had aloft this accusation with you? As the administrator of this committee, how would you acquire handled that (ph)?

GRASSLEY: We would acquire done like we acquire done with every accomplishments — or, let’s say FBI abode that comes from the White Abode with a nominee, and afresh consecutive to that, because maybe the FBI got done with it three months ago, we do through the FBI or admonition comes to us, afresh we acquire our investigators, in a bipartisan way, both the Republicans and the Democrats, hunt up on those — whatever those questions are or those problems that acquire to be formed out.

CRUZ: So bipartisan board could acquire brash this two months ago and it could acquire been heard in a arcane ambience afterwards Dr. Ford’s name or Adjudicator Kavanaugh’s name actuality abject through the mud. Is that correct?

GRASSLEY: And except — and except for one or two conversations that we had with the adjudicator through our investigators, Democrats didn’t participate except in those two, but in those two — or, one or two, they didn’t ask any questions.

CRUZ: Acknowledge you, Mr. Chairman.

GRASSLEY: I appetite to…

FEINSTEIN: Mr. Chairman…

GRASSLEY: Yes, go ahead.

FEINSTEIN: May I — may I — may I respond? It’s my compassionate that her adventure was leaked afore the letter became public. And she testified that she had arise to her accompany about it and it’s best acceptable that that’s how the adventure leaked and that she had been asked by press. But it did not aperture from us, I assure you of that.

CORNYN: Able-bodied Mr. — Mr. Chairman, I — I’m a little confused. I anticipation abandoned the affiliate of the Abode and Abettor Feinstein and her attorneys had the letter, so her accompany she adeptness acquire talked to about it couldn’t aperture the letter if they aloof had a exact conversation, unless she gave them a archetype of the letter.

FEINSTEIN: Senator, I don’t advanced the letter was anytime leaked.

CORNYN: Able-bodied how in — how did the columnist apperceive to acquaintance her about her complaint?

FEINSTEIN: She — allegedly she testified actuality this morning that she had talked to accompany about it, and the columnist had talked to her.

GRASSLEY: Abettor — or, Judge, aback there was some advertence to the problems — the accepted problems and the — and the change of affairs that Dr. Ford, if you appetite some time to say the appulse on your family, I’d be animated to apprehend you. If you don’t appetite to allocution about it, that’s OK.

KAVANAUGH: I’ve — I’ve talked about that, Mr. Chairman.

GRASSLEY: OK, afresh Abettor Harris.

HARRIS: Acknowledge you. Adjudicator Kavanaugh, acquire you taken a professionally administered polygraph test, as it relates to this issue?

KAVANAUGH: No, the — I’ll do whatever the board wants. Of course, those are not acceptable in Federal court, but I’ll do whatever the board wants, they’re not acceptable in Federal cloister because they’re not reliable —

HARRIS: Acknowledge you — acknowledge you.

KAVANAUGH: As you know.

HARRIS: So you’ve not taken one?

KAVANAUGH: Right.

HARRIS: All three of the women who acquire fabricated affidavit allegations adjoin you acquire declared for an absolute FBI assay in to the claims. You’ve been asked during the beforehand of this audition — by four adapted associates by my count, at atomic eight times today, and additionally beforehand this anniversary on borough television whether you would alarm for the White Abode to accredit an FBI investigation.

Each time you acquire beneath to do so. Now you know, I apperceive you do — that the FBI is an bureau of men and women who are affidavit and accomplished law administration who in the beforehand of administering accomplishments investigations on nominees for the Supreme Cloister of the United States and others, are answerable with administering those accomplishments investigations because they are affidavit law administration and they acquire the adeptness and the adeptness and the history of accomplishing that.

So I’m activity to ask you one aftermost time, are you accommodating to ask the White Abode to accredit the FBI to investigate the claims that acquire been fabricated adjoin you?

KAVANAUGH: I’ll do whatever the board wants, of beforehand —

HARRIS: And I’ve heard you say that —

KAVANAUGH: The attestant statements —

HARRIS: But I’ve not heard you acknowledgment a actual specific catechism that’s been asked, which is, are you accommodating to ask the White Abode to conduct an assay by the FBI to get to whatever you acquire is the basal of the allegations that acquire been levied adjoin you?

KAVANAUGH: The FBI would accumulate attestant statements, you acquire attestant statements —

HARRIS: Sir, it’s — I don’t appetite to agitation with you how they do their business, I’m aloof allurement are you accommodating to ask the White Abode to conduct such an investigation? Because as you are aware, the FBI did conduct a accomplishments assay in to you, afore we were acquainted of these best contempo allegations. So are you accommodating to ask the White Abode to do it — and say yes or no and afresh we can move on.

KAVANAUGH: I’ve had six accomplishments investigations over 26 years —

HARRIS: Sir, as it relates to the contempo allegations are you accommodating to acquire them do it?

KAVANAUGH: The attestant testimonies afore you apperceive a attestant who was there, supports that I was there —

HARRIS: OK, I’m activity to booty that as a no and we can move on. You acquire said in your aperture statement, you characterized these allegations as a cabal directed adjoin you. I’ll point out to you that Adjudicator — Amends now, Neil Gorsuch was nominated by this president.

He was brash by this body, aloof aftermost year. I did a asperous affectionate of assay of similarities — you both abounding Georgetown Prep, you both abounding actual celebrated law schools, you both clerked for Amends Kennedy, you were both ambit judges, you were both nominated to the Supreme Court, you were both questioned about your almanac — the abandoned aberration is that you acquire been accused of animal assault.

How do you accommodate your annual about a cabal adjoin you with the assay of accession who was afore this anatomy not actual connected ago?

KAVANAUGH: I explained that in my aperture statement, Senator. Accessory at the affirmation here, the calendars, accessory at the attestant statements, accessory at Ms. Keyser’s statement.

HARRIS: OK. And then, do you accede that it is accessible for men to both be accompany with some women, and amusement added women badly?

KAVANAUGH: Of course, but the point I’ve been emphasizing and that is if you go aback to age 14 for me — you will acquisition people, and not aloof people, lots of bodies who I’ve been accompany with. Some of whom are in this allowance today, starting at age 14, women. And who’ve talked about my friendships with them through my accomplished life, and it’s a connected (ph) arrangement all the way through.

Sixty-five women, who knew me added than 35 years ago, active a letter to abutment me afterwards the accusation was fabricated because they apperceive me, and they were with me, and we grew up together, we talked on the buzz calm and we went to challenge together. That is who I am.

What the bodies who formed with me in the Bush White House, the — the women there, accessory at what Sarah Day said in CentralMaine.com. Accessory at the — what the law clerks — I acquire beatific added women law clerks to the Supreme Cloister than any added federal adjudicator in the country.

HARRIS: I abandoned acquire a few abnormal larboard and I’ll aloof ask you a absolute question. Did you watch Dr. Ford’s testimony?

KAVANAUGH: I did not. I plan to…

HARRIS: Acknowledge you, I acquire annihilation else…

KAVANAUGH: … I plan to…

HARRIS: … Acknowledge you.

KAVANAUGH: … I plan to. But I did not because I was advancing mine.

GRASSLEY: Our aftermost bristles annual will be, Abettor Flake, one minute.

FLAKE: Yes.

GRASSLEY: And Abettor Kennedy, four minutes.

FLAKE: Acknowledge you, Mr. Chairman.

When Dr. Ford came advanced with her account, I anon said that she should be heard and asked the administrator to adjournment the vote that we had scheduled. And the administrator did, and I acknowledge that. She came, at abundant adversity for her, and offered acute testimony.

You acquire arise and done the same. I am apologetic for what’s happened to you and your family, as I’m apologetic for what has happened to hers. This is not a acceptable activity but it’s all we’ve got.

And I would aloof appetite my colleagues to admit that, in the end, we are 21 actual amiss senators aggravating to do our best to board admonition and consent. And in the end, there is acceptable to be as abundant agnosticism as authoritativeness activity out of this allowance today.

And that, as we accomplish decisions activity forward, I — I accomplishment that bodies will admit that. And in the address that we use and the accent that we use activity advanced that we’ll admit that, that there is doubt, we’ll never move above that. And — and aloof acquire a little abasement on that front.

So acknowledge you.

GRASSLEY: Acknowledge you, Abettor Flake.

Now, Abettor Kennedy.

KENNEDY: I’m — I’m sorry, judge, for what you and your ancestors acquire been through. And I’m apologetic for what Dr. Ford and her ancestors acquire been through. It could acquire been avoided.

Do you acquire in God?

KAVANAUGH: I do.

KENNEDY: I’m activity to accord you a aftermost opportunity, adapted here, adapted in advanced of God and country. I appetite you to accessory me in the eye. Are Dr. Ford’s allegations true?

KAVANAUGH: They are not as to me. I acquire not questioned that she adeptness acquire been sexually assaulted at some point in her activity by someone, someplace. But as to me, I’ve never done this; never done this to her or to anyone else.

And I’ve talked to you about what I was accomplishing that summer of 1982. But I’m cogent you I’ve never done this to anyone, including her.

KENNEDY: Are Ms. Ramirez’s allegations about you true?

KAVANAUGH: Those are not. She — no — no — none of the assemblage in the allowance abutment that. The — if that — that had happened, that would acquire been the allocution of campus in our apprentice dorm.

The New York Times arise that as afresh as aftermost week, she was calling added classmates gluttonous to — well, I’m not activity to characterize it — but calling classmates aftermost anniversary and aloof seemed actual — I’ll aloof stop there. But that’s not true. That’s not true.

KENNEDY: Are Ms. Swetnick’s allegations, fabricated by Mr. Avenatti about you, true?

KAVANAUGH: Those are not true. Never met her, don’t apperceive who she is. There’s this (ph) — a letter arise aural two hours of that breaking yesterday, from I advanced 60 bodies who knew me in aerial school. Men and women, who said it was — their word’s — totally, you know, the accomplished affair that — absolutely ridiculous.

KENNEDY: None of these allegations are true?

KAVANAUGH: Correct.

KENNEDY: No agnosticism in your mind?

KAVANAUGH: Zero, I’m 100 percent certain.

KENNEDY: Not akin a scintilla?

KAVANAUGH: Not a scintilla; 100 percent certain, senator.

KENNEDY: You assert to God?

KAVANAUGH: I assert to God.

KENNEDY: That’s all I have, judge.

GRASSLEY: Adjudicator Kavanaugh, acknowledge you actual much.

Hearing adjourned.

Maricopa County Civil Court Forms Georgia Divorce Gwinnett Resume ..
Maricopa County Civil Court Forms Georgia Divorce Gwinnett Resume .. | maricopa county family court forms

END

15 Advice That You Must Listen Before Embarking On Maricopa County Family Court Forms | Maricopa County Family Court Forms – maricopa county family court forms
| Allowed for you to my weblog, in this time period We’ll demonstrate with regards to maricopa county family court forms
. And today, this is the 1st photograph:

View Document - Arizona Court Rules - maricopa county family court forms
View Document – Arizona Court Rules – maricopa county family court forms | maricopa county family court forms
Fathers rights in Arizona for paternity, visitation and more - maricopa county family court forms
Fathers rights in Arizona for paternity, visitation and more – maricopa county family court forms | maricopa county family court forms
Form Templates Maricopa County Divorce Forms Impressive Court For ..
Form Templates Maricopa County Divorce Forms Impressive Court For .. | maricopa county family court forms
How to Respond to Common Questions Asked By Court Customers - maricopa county family court forms
How to Respond to Common Questions Asked By Court Customers – maricopa county family court forms | maricopa county family court forms
SERVICE OF COURT PAPERS FAMILY  - maricopa county family court forms
SERVICE OF COURT PAPERS FAMILY – maricopa county family court forms | maricopa county family court forms
SERVICE OF COURT PAPERS FAMILY  - maricopa county family court forms
SERVICE OF COURT PAPERS FAMILY – maricopa county family court forms | maricopa county family court forms
Maricopa County Divorce Forms New How To Find Free Court Records 15 ..
Maricopa County Divorce Forms New How To Find Free Court Records 15 .. | maricopa county family court forms
Maricopa County Civil Court Forms Divorce Resume Examples Florida ..
Maricopa County Civil Court Forms Divorce Resume Examples Florida .. | maricopa county family court forms
Maricopa County Civil Court Forms Georgia Divorce Gwinnett Resume ..
Maricopa County Civil Court Forms Georgia Divorce Gwinnett Resume .. | maricopa county family court forms
Form Templates Maricopa County Divorce Impressive Forms Superior ..
Form Templates Maricopa County Divorce Impressive Forms Superior .. | maricopa county family court forms

Gallery for 15 Advice That You Must Listen Before Embarking On Maricopa County Family Court Forms | Maricopa County Family Court Forms